PhonZhi
Veteran
They lost 62!!!
Give me at least 110 then we can talk
Give me at least 110 then we can talk
Give me at least 110 then we can talk
So are you impressed with a 90-72 record??Can a mod retitle this thread "I don't understand baseball" please?
So are you impressed with a 90-72 record??
Or a 50 win basketball team. That's all I'm sayinAs impressed as I am by a 10-win team in the NFL.
What is an impressive number of wins for you in each sport?what exactly are you rambling about
Or a 50 win basketball team. That's all I'm sayin
its crazy that its technically the same as a 10-6 football team
way too many games to play
It's only the same if you don't understand either sport.

though ...like a 13-3 football teambaseball is more long-run oriented, football is short term oriented. shyt tends to fall back to averages and probability when you play 100+ games.its crazy that its technically the same as a 10-6 football team...which can miss the playoffs...but in baseball youd probably be like 8 or 9 games ahead in 1st with that record
way too many games to play
Well that's a lot of losing for the "best teams in baseball" if they capping off at 90 or so wins. If your losing 70 that's not impressive at all just on paperWell, you started at 100 wins....which is a level 6 teams have reached in the last decade.
So yes, 100 wins is pretty impressive.
That shyt is next level disrespect...i didnt even bother to neg the last person i saw say thatnikkas on here call Cal Ripken's record a participation trophy, so... No, they don't respect it.