its not a passionate disagreement. I'm just pointing out a flaw in your reasoning.
But whatever. You'll continue to pass off your passive aggression under the guise of you pretending not to care![]()
thanks
its not a passionate disagreement. I'm just pointing out a flaw in your reasoning.
But whatever. You'll continue to pass off your passive aggression under the guise of you pretending not to care![]()
This is the classic dilemma.
Is what god says to do good because god says it, or because its good already?
... nah, speak for yourself,breh. I'm a goody two shoes all the time.Actually all are evil bc we sin. You sure you know what he Bible says on that matter.
Bingo.
...we do.![]()
But also you adopted this discipline but from whom, or did you develop it yourself?
We made the rules to benefit ourselves.
You as a person, these doctrines were imposed on you from infancy.
You as a person, by what mete do you choose what to accept and what to reject?
1. Accept? I accept whatever can be proven...
2....but when it comes to morality, you basically accept that you're making shyt up arbitrarily.
Napoleon said:Euthyphro Dilemma
I understand that. my question is, by ends of moral right what do you choose as mete to form your discipline?
Logically invalid argument is logically invalid.
Napoleon said:Its not invalid though![]()
I don't know what you mean by "moral right"