Arizona Governor Doug Ducey signs bill that bans close recording of law enforcement

[bnew]

Arizona Gov. Ducey signs bill banning close recording of law enforcement; ACLU calls it unconstitutional

A bill that was signed into law by the Arizona governor on July 6 bans recording law enforcement officials within 8 feet.

www.fox10phoenix.com

By FOX 10 Staff
Published July 6, 2022 10:05PM
Arizona Politics
FOX 10 Phoenix

Gov. Doug Ducey signs bill that restricts recording of law enforcement​

Under the police recording bill that was signed into law, recording law enforcement within 8 feet is illegal, with some exceptions.

PHOENIX - On July 6, Arizona Governor Doug Ducey signed into law a bill that makes it illegal to record law enforcement within 8 feet (about 2.4 meters).
Under the new law, it is a misdemeanor if someone keeps recording, after getting a verbal warning to stop. There are, however, some exceptions to the law, including if the person recording is the one being questioned by police.

While supporters say the law is meant to protect law enforcement from harm or distraction, critics say the law is unconstitutional, and does nothing to enhance transparency.

 

[bnew]

republican governors

 

[Edub]

There are a lot of people in office who don’t understand the constitution…. The courts will overturn this bill

 

[bnew]

There are a lot of people in office who don’t understand the constitution…. The courts will overturn this bill

the conservative courts with MAGAt judges?

 

[Cereal_Bowl_Assassin]

What happened to "Comply if you have nothing to hide"?

 

[Edub]

the conservative courts with MAGAt judges?

It won’t stand g…watch some circuit appeals court is gonna shyt on this

 

[bnew]

It won’t stand g…watch some circuit appeals court is gonna shyt on this

these republican judges don't give a damn now. anything is possible but I hope you're right.

 

[Edub]

.

What does big pharma have to do wit timing the police within 8 ft ….you might be in the wrong thread g

 

[Adeptus Astartes]

these republican judges don't give a damn now. anything is possible but I hope you're right.

It won’t stand g…watch some circuit appeals court is gonna shyt on this

SCOTUS already refused to rule on this issue a year ago

 

[Cryptocurrency Scarface]

That’s a First amendment violation

 

[Orbital-Fetus]

 

[Billy Ocean]

Ayo....

@HellRell804 (King c00nta)
@ORDER_66
@The Hon. Stringer Bell
@Losttribe
@satam55
@TallMan_J
@gator_king
@director_of_bands
@thekingsmen
@tuckgod
@Lord-Yosh
@HarlemHottie
@Nicole0416_646NYC
@JT-Money
@Captain Crunch
@*DalMem* (resident pedophile)
@LuckyLibra619
@saturn7
@Skooby
@Big Boda
@Rell Lauren
@SupremexKing
@DEAD7
@Thavoiceofthevoiceless
@CoryMack
@O.G.B
@Mowgli
@King45
@SwizzLake


Y'all coward c00ns and cacs care to chime in?

 

[Edub]

SCOTUS already refused to rule on this issue a year ago

Gotta link?

 

[Elim Garak]

I'm sorry but it's time to form two countries these far right motherfukkers are too far gone.

 

[Adeptus Astartes]

Gotta link?

I think it was technically a qualified immunity case () but recording the police was the cause. Some dude was thretened by police in 2014 for daring to record cops beating a man.

Supreme Court Refuses To Protect First Amendment Right To Film Police Brutality

Without any dissent, the U.S. Supreme Court on Monday refused to hear a case that could have protected the public’s right to record on-duty police officers, but will instead make it even harder to hold police accountable.

www.forbes.com