godkiller
"We are the Fury"
I'm far smarter than you. So is OP.
Article Calls Out Black Men On Traveling to Brazil :dead:
- Thread starter MikeBrownsJob
- Start date
I'm far smarter than you. So is OP.
Damn, both you and @TheStripper think the worst out of people. I'm actually sorry some of ya'll feel that way.
godkiller
"We are the Fury"
No, man, it's called pragmatism and living in the real world. Think about that before you put on your cape and cowl for the night, breh.
Didnt read it. Seems like some simp nikka is mad nikkas are going to Brazil, yet wont call out the white men doing the same. Brazil is a beautiful country and observes many traditional African celebrations. Why can't it be that African Americans just want to enjoy that and see the Big Jesus?
No, man, it's called pragmatism and living in the real world. Think about that before you put on your cape and cowl for the night, breh.
I didn't go to Cuba for it's women, but it was what I felt one of it's attributes. I went there and ended up chilling on the beach for 7 days with my tablet reading game of thrones relaxing.
I never saw anybody tricking other than old balding white people, Cuban hookers would give me one look and I'd give that look
They know I'm just here to laze around drinking momosas.. Blacks don't do this shyt, and even if they did, there's nothing wrong. Keep your morals to yourself.
my thing is, even if it's mostly about the sex tourism for a lot of people, what exactly is wrong with sex tourism? people keep talking about exploitation but again for the third time, what if sex tourism stopped, then what? what alternatives are y'all personally bringing to the prostitutes if it were to stop?
godkiller
"We are the Fury"
I sort of made this argument earlier. You help the local economy and employ these girls when you pay for sex
But then, on the other hand, you exploit them and open them up to diseases/abuse/assault. But my take is if it's going to happen anyway, why not me
@Lord Aldon is a dumbass
godkiller
"We are the Fury"
I have yet to see you make a cogent argument in this thread or any other. It must be hard having -370 neg rep. You'll have -380 soon
if an std free man goes to brazil, meets a prostitute, they both agree on a price, fukks her without abusing her or assaulting her, how is he responsible for these girls being exploited by other parties? why is she not responsible for choosing to be a streetwalker? (assuming it's a choice she made and no one is forcing her)I sort of made this argument earlier. You help the local economy and employ these girls when you pay for sex
But then, on the other hand, you exploit them and open them up to diseases/abuse/assault. But my take is if it's going to happen anyway, why not me
in other words, where exactly is the exploitation?
I support you and your tricking ways. Why are you so angry?
Because your p*ssy stank. Hoe.
godkiller
"We are the Fury"
He isn't directly responsible for her predicament, but he does bolster the environment for abuses since he is buying the sex. It's like selling drugs. A drug dealer makes a deal that both parties agree with and it's his customer's choice to buy the drugs. However, selling drugs is a moral hazard because there are larger consequences which the drug dealer indirectly contributes through his agreed sale (ie. a mother might overdose and leave her child in need).
that would assuming I give a fukk about reps
but even in your example, wouldn't the drug-dealer = the prostitute? the buyer would be the trick.