As a Bron Stan...

[duncanthetall]

The bolded is the important part

Lets just say there are two players, one is 3/11 in the finals and one is 3/3 in the finals

If both players win the same amount of rings with the same number of finals MVPs, rings is a wash, then you go to what happened the other years they didnt win. One would say "the years I didnt win a ring I led my team to the finals 8 times" the other would say "the years I didnt win a ring, I led my team to the lottery or lost in the first round. Thats why the 3/11 resume would be better than the 3/3 resume. Winning the ring is the ultimate goal, so the closer you are to the ring, the better your season.

Breh. Logic doesn't work. They claim he had more opportunities to win the Finals as if every team doesn't start off with the same record. As if losing in the first or second round means you didn't have an opportunity. No, it means you failed earlier. Somehow to these dudes getting to the Finals and losing is worse than losing in the 1st round. That is not logical. They're using their emotions and hatred for the breh to not just move the goalposts but to turn that shyt into soccer nets. You can't argue with these people.

 

[THE MACHINE]

Breh this makes little to no sense cause we will be giving you participation points while claiming you the “GOAT”

Nikka if you go to 11 finals you better win atleast more than half cause how the hell you go to that many finals and lose 8?

That means you lost more than 3 times in a row atleast once during that run.

You probably got swept in one series

You probably gave up in another series

You probably got your ass whooped by a record margin in that other


This makes little to NO sense other than your stats were better since you went more. But if you lose and how you lost during that process will work aganist you. You were “closer to the ring” yet ended your career with the same amount of rings as the nikka whos 3/3 cause your a LOSER who couldn’t get it done more than 50% of those finals trips


Lebron is 3 out of 8.

He’s been swept
He has two back to back finals losses
He choked in 2011
He lost by a record margin in 2014


This can not continue if he’s “chasing the ghost on Mj” and post like yours is why there’s a negative perception around him. Cause your logic has everybody else likei rather be 3/3 than 3/11 cause perception wise everybody will focus on those 8 Ls. Also how did you make 11 finals but only one three? What conference did you play in? Clearly it was a weaker conference if you got your ass whooped by teams out of the other conference so much. You were “closer to the ring” but you lost 8 times....and still have the same amount of rings as the nikka who went lessEVEN THOUGH YOU HAD MORE OPPORTUNITIES to win more than the nikka whos 3/3

Like I said that will work aganist you. It already is with lebron to an extend

Cause we are NOT gonna keep giving lebron participation points, knowing damn well he’s going to get his ass whipped before the series even starts, after this season.

Come 2018-2019 season HE HAS TO GET IT DONE in my best SAS voice or this “well atleast he made it” shyt ain’t cutting it nomore

I don’t care if you made 10 finals in row if you lost in more than half. 6/6>>>>>>>

We are talking Finals resume. What is so difficult to understand? If we both have 3 rings and 3 finals MVPs, we cant use the rings as a determining factor. We have to move to something else. It only works if Rings and Finals MVPs are tied though. If im 1 or 2 or 3 behind there is no argument, you have the better finals resume, point blank.

5/11< 6/6
6/11> 6/6 (assuming both players won 6 fMVPs, you can no longer talk about championship wins or finals MVPs, its a wash)

I am not saying Bron is the goat, I am saying Mike is the GOAT. But if Bron were 6/11 in the Finals (with 6 fMVPs) he would have a better "Finals" resume than Mike 6/6 (6 fMVPs).

There are no participation trophies breh, getting to the finals more with the same amount of rings and finals MVPs is a better finals resume. Participation trophy is giving only a gold medal and everyone else getting a silver, its levels. We both race 10 times. We both win 2 golds, you got 6 silvers and I finish last 6 times and Im claiming Im the same sprinter as you because both of us only won 2 golds, hell nah, its levels.

Other things are to be considered in basketball for goat consideration...competition...scoring titles...dpoy...fg%

 

[Jordan>>LeFrozen]

We are talking Finals resume. What is so difficult to understand? If we both have 3 rings and 3 finals MVPs, we cant use the rings as a determining factor. We have to move to something else. It only works if Rings and Finals MVPs are tied though. If im 1 or 2 or 3 behind there is no argument, you have the better finals resume, point blank.

5/11< 6/6
6/11> 6/6 (assuming both players won 6 fMVPs, you can no longer talk about championship wins or finals MVPs, its a wash)

I am not saying Bron is the goat, I am saying Mike is the GOAT. But if Bron were 6/11 in the Finals (with 6 fMVPs) he would have a better "Finals" resume than Mike 6/6 (6 fMVPs).

There are no participation trophies breh, getting to the finals more with the same amount of rings and finals MVPs is a better finals resume. Participation trophy is giving only a gold medal and everyone else getting a silver, its levels. We both race 10 times. We both win 2 golds, you got 6 silvers and I finish last 6 times and Im claiming Im the same sprinter as you because both of us only won 2 golds, hell nah, its levels.

Other things are to be considered in basketball for goat consideration...competition...scoring titles...dpoy...fg%

YOUR RESUME IS IRRELEVANT IF YOU KEEP LOSING what part of that are you not getting?

If we both have 3 rings, I did it in 3 tries, you did in 11 total. Why do we have the same amount of rings? You had more opportunities
You had more chances
You clearly had a better team or you played in a weaker conference
Your logic makes no sense. You got more tries than me, yet couldn’t get it done. I got it done every try.

And finals are a major part in the GOAT convo. 6 of 6 is important. When we talk Brady vs Joe even, rings are apart of that discussion as well. Only reason Brady gets a pass is simply put, he won more than Joe.

You can not talk “goat” in basketball when you keep pilling up losses, with this “well atleast I made it” excuse every time.

We both got 3 rings, why? you had more chances than to me get more. You couldnt get it done.

By participation points, I mean we are giving you credit for essentially making it to the finals, not winning. That’s cool the first few times. 11 though? Naw

Simply put. You got to get it done. I don’t care if Jordan lost in the first round? Why
CAUSE
WE
DONT
TALK
ABOUT
LEBRON
LOSING
IN
THE
PLAYOFFS

we talk about him losing in the finals. If that continues than the ghost of Jordan will disappear from him

 

[Kings County]

YOUR RESUME IS IRRELEVANT IF YOU KEEP LOSING what part of that are you not getting?

If we both have 3 rings, I did it in 3 tries, you did in 11 total. Why do we have the same amount of rings? You had more opportunities
You had more chances
You clearly had a better team or you played in a weaker conference
Your logic makes no sense. You got more tries than me, yet couldn’t get it done. I got it done every try.

And finals are a major part in the GOAT convo. 6 of 6 is important. When we talk Brady vs Joe even, rings are apart of that discussion as well. Only reason Brady gets a pass is simply put, he won more than Joe.

You can not talk “goat” in basketball when you keep pilling up losses, with this “well atleast I made it” excuse every time.

We both got 3 rings, why? you had more chances than to me get more. You couldnt get it done.

By participation points, I mean we are giving you credit for essentially making it to the finals, not winning. That’s cool the first few times. 11 though? Naw

lebron has played better teams though, competition plays a huge part
lol the warriors team currently assembled could prolly beat an all star team

 

[Jordan>>LeFrozen]

lebron has played better teams though, competition plays a huge part
lol the warriors team currently assembled could prolly beat an all star team

And that’s why I said after this season, when he goes into free agency, he has to assemble a team and he has to get it done. By 2018-2019 seasom finish. Nobody wants to keep hearing “more help” for a nikka whos called “LeGM” and has so much “power” and everybody wants to play with him

 

[Kings County]

And that’s why I said after this season, when he goes into free agency, he has to assemble a team and he has to get it done. By 2018-2019 seasom finish. Nobody wants to keep hearing “more help” for a nikka whos called “LeGM” and has so much “power” and everybody wants to play with him

u right cant even argue with that

 

[THE MACHINE]

YOUR RESUME IS IRRELEVANT IF YOU KEEP LOSING what part of that are you not getting?

If we both have 3 rings, I did it in 3 tries, you did in 11 total. Why do we have the same amount of rings? You had more opportunities
You had more chances
You clearly had a better team or you played in a weaker conference
Your logic makes no sense. You got more tries than me, yet couldn’t get it done. I got it done every try.

And finals are a major part in the GOAT convo. 6 of 6 is important. When we talk Brady vs Joe even, rings are apart of that discussion as well. Only reason Brady gets a pass is simply put, he won more than Joe.

You can not talk “goat” in basketball when you keep pilling up losses, with this “well atleast I made it” excuse every time.

We both got 3 rings, why? you had more chances than to me get more. You couldnt get it done.

By participation points, I mean we are giving you credit for essentially making it to the finals, not winning. That’s cool the first few times. 11 though? Naw

Simply put. You got to get it done. I don’t care if Jordan lost in the first round? Why
CAUSE
WE
DONT
TALK
ABOUT
LEBRON
LOSING
IN
THE
PLAYOFFS

we talk about him losing in the finals. If that continues than the ghost of Jordan will disappear from him

Every season you dont win you are losing, so how is losing in the Finals worse?

3/11 isnt more tries than 3/3, you just didnt make it 8 times, you lost earlier. You had the same amount of tries as me and did worse than I did

 

[CEITEDMOFO]

JEMELLE HILL IS SUCH TRASH TALKIN ABOUT "JORDAN STANS"

THERES NO SUCH THING OF BEING A STAN OF GOD

 

[Captain Crunch]

Ehhhhh... Bron has never played off ball well and didn't want to. Would be an interesting adjustment

He can certainly do, the issue is wanting to. Hopefully that report of Bron wanting to play offball is true, because it could be dope watching Bron play off Biid and Ben.

 

[waltthizzney]

Legendary LeThot thread on its way

 

[Kobes Two Jerseys]

The bolded is the important part

Lets just say there are two players, one is 3/11 in the finals and one is 3/3 in the finals

If both players win the same amount of rings with the same number of finals MVPs, rings is a wash, then you go to what happened the other years they didnt win. One would say "the years I didnt win a ring I led my team to the finals 8 times" the other would say "the years I didnt win a ring, I led my team to the lottery or lost in the first round. Thats why the 3/11 resume would be better than the 3/3 resume. Winning the ring is the ultimate goal, so the closer you are to the ring, the better your season.

So Jerry West is top 3? He is the logo afterall.

 

[Kobes Two Jerseys]

Every season you dont win you are losing, so how is losing in the Finals worse?

3/11 isnt more tries than 3/3, you just didnt make it 8 times, you lost earlier. You had the same amount of tries as me and did worse than I did

Post the road to the finals. For instance. Beating two 41 win teams in the first and second round isnt impressive.

 

[THE MACHINE]

So Jerry West is top 3? He is the logo afterall.

His finals resume is better than someone who went 1/1 (assuming they both got fMVP), because he would have gotten there 7 more times. If someone won 2 rings and got fMVP twice, their Finals resume is better. This isnt rocket science y'all

 

[Kobes Two Jerseys]

His finals resume is better than someone who went 1/1 (assuming they both got fMVP), because he would have gotten there 7 more times. If someone won 2 rings and got fMVP twice, their Finals resume is better. This isnt rocket science y'all

So Jerry West >>>> Zeke?

 

[THE MACHINE]

So Jerry West >>>> Zeke?

Jerry West has 1 ring breh

Zeke has 2

Zeke finals resume 2/3 > West 1/8

If Jerry West was 2/8 then his Finals resume would be better with the 1 fMVP