As a man, does hearing that another man cheated on his wife or spouse change your opinion about them

[Hungry Rabbit]

...why would my homie charge me?... wasn't talking bout me.. anyone else he would...good try tho...

Why would I pay brah?

 

[King Jae]

Why would I pay brah?

I was talking in general chief...u asked to be put on game..told u what Ps I knew would do...didn't say u would pay...calm down

 

[King Poetic]

depends on the situation

the key is to hear the whole story so u get a good understanding.. cause dude can easily do dirt on you

 

[Hungry Rabbit]

I was talking in general chief...u asked to be put on game..told u what Ps I knew would do...didn't say u would pay...calm down

... Brah I saw your post, asked to be put on game, then you tell me that you not a pimp but that you knew some who would put me on game but it would cost me, then you said they wouldn't charge you for the game but they charge other people (clearly me in this case nikka), then I respond well why would I pay?, and then you tell me to calm down because you never said I would pay? LOL NO shyt you never said that nikka

Apparently you don't got no game brah, or you gonna make me pay for it which I simply will not do because why the fukk would I?

 

[the artist known az]

One of my homie's cheated on his wife, when he told me I felt kinda

Didn't think about it in years, thanks a lot OP

 

[King Jae]

... Brah I saw your post, asked to be put on game, then you tell me that you not a pimp but that you knew some who would put me on game but it would cost me, then you said they wouldn't charge you for the game but they charge other people (clearly me in this case nikka), then I respond well why would I pay?, and then you tell me to calm down because you never said I would pay? LOL NO shyt you never said that nikka

Apparently you don't got no game brah, or you gonna make me pay for it which I simply will not do because why the fukk would I?

...ur trolling me for what reason exactly? u don't have game if u askin...soooo....that's whole lotta words for no reason...stop trying to get into a pissin match...u one of them mgtow fools...u all sassy n shyt...go sashay down to the track if that pressed to know the inner workings of the underworld.....

 

[Hungry Rabbit]

...ur trolling me for what reason exactly? u don't have game if u askin...soooo....that's whole lotta words for no reason...stop trying to get into a pissin match...u one of them mgtow fools...u all sassy n shyt...go sashay down to the track if that pressed to know the inner workings of the underworld.....

I'm not trolling you nikka, all I asked was for you to PUT ME ON TO GAME. You don't know if I have game or not brah, what the fukk are you talking about??? If LBJ ask for some info on basketball that mean he don't got no game now?

I'm not no MGTOW fools nikka, I actually love and adore women

And nikka all I was looking for was a perspective from a pimp on why being honest with women is most effective - I could give a fukk about how the underworld work. I can google that shyt if I really wanted to know

 

[King Jae]

I'm not trolling you nikka, all I asked was for you to PUT ME ON TO GAME. You don't know if I have game or not brah, what the fukk are you talking about??? If LBJ ask for some info on basketball that mean he don't got no game now?

I'm not no MGTOW fools nikka, I actually love and adore women

And nikka all I was looking for was a perspective from a pimp on why being honest with women is most effective - I could give a fukk about how the underworld work. I can google that shyt if I really wanted to know

so then why ask me? u are trolling..u yelling n shyt cuz I see thru it..u really emotional..take 3 deep breaths bruh.. step away from the phone..go get some fresh air..its a nice day out...

 

[MeachTheMonster]

I'm not a judgmental person. I just take notes and react accordingly

If you are a cheater, I know you're not to be trusted.

 

[Hungry Rabbit]

so then why ask me? u are trolling..u yelling n shyt cuz I see thru it..u really emotional..take 3 deep breaths bruh.. step away from the phone..go get some fresh air..its a nice day out...

Lol, because you were the nikka on the first page talkin bout being honest is the best way as if you actually know some shyt haha Clearly you're dumb af, don't got no game, and are a troll yourself so I'ma let you cook brah

Lol, how do you know I'm yelling nikka, are you watching me right now??? clown ass nikka

 

[King Jae]

Lol, because you were the nikka on the first page talkin bout being honest is the best way as if you actually know some shyt haha Clearly you're dumb af, don't got no game, and are a troll yourself so I'ma let you cook brah

Lol, how do you know I'm yelling nikka, are you watching me right now??? clown ass nikka

..stop trying to keep the thread on the first page...aren't emojis used to express emotion? u used 9 emojis....u not emotional?

 

[Hiphoplives4eva]

You have Google dear. I was just letting you know you're wrong in your equating sexual drive to testosterone levels, but I'm not going to do the work for you.

I've done plenty of work thought out my life in this area and I can wholeheartedly say you don't know what the fukk your taking about.

Good day dear.

 

[PartyHeart]

@PartyHeart are you aware every link you've just posted didn't disapprove a single thing I've said nor even addresses anything the entire studies I linked.

Listen it's obvious that even by the links you've cited that you can neither prove your theory that sexual behavior is solely environment and nor is that the scientific consensus. Fortunately most actual scientists have a nuanced opinion that concludes that sexuality (like most highly subjective cognitive-based concepts) is in fact a product of both nature and nurture not just one component like you're pushing.

You're operating from a position of confirmation bias just like the anti-women trolls in this thread; for instance saying fallacious statements like "If women can be physically aroused by a wider range of sexual stimuli, this could be said to indicate a stronger sex drive in women, could it not?" implies that the word "wide" is synonymous with the word "strong". You're acting as if something can not be wider than a thing and still be weaker, but I'm sure you knew that but chose to that invoke that failed game of semantics for the sake of your argument anyway.

FWIW here's another study, by yet another scientist (who is a woman) that admits men have a stronger sex drive than women. http://www.peplaulab.ucla.edu/Peplau_Lab/Publications_files/Peplau 2003.pdf

Btw it's clear you didn't fully read the first link in my previous post; sexuality is a sociological concept that is inherently subjective and it's purely cognitive based. My link is research about sexual dimorphism in cognition and behaviour, and explores the role of X-linked genes. It clearly shows how biology can influence cognition which in turns influences cognitive based concepts like sexuality. Even in the abstract it explains before it goes much deeper into it...


The bottomline, is we both can find scientists and scholarly articles who support our positions, but the fundamental difference is that you chose to get attached to only one ideological component(nuture) and outright deny the influence of the other(nature) that scientists have identified as a factor as well, where as I acknowledge both and view both as having an influence on cognitive based-concepts and fortunately it's backed by modern behavioral genetic research that doesn't view the nature vs. nurture dichotomy as something worth picking sides anymore, due to the well-documented interaction of genes and environment.

This is a lot of talk but you have yet to post a study that confirms your POV. I have posted 3. Please provide at least one.

The previous one you linked does not say anything about sexual dimorphism being the reason for men having a higher sex drive than women (your claim). You did not read your own link. Now you are trying to make a very tenuous link between sexual dimorphism -> cognition -> behavior -> sexual behavior. Something your research paper itself did not do.

The one you have posted now again attempts to make claims on female and male sexuality based on reporting. This is something I thoroughly debunked when you first tried to bring it up pages ago. You have already admitted that social factors are an influencer, yet none of the things you post take that into consideration in their research methodology. You admit that you believe that social and biological factors influence sexual desire, but none of your research attempts to take social factors into account at all when measuring. I wonder why that is Especially since all of mine have taken both into consideration.

Lastly, you are getting arguments mixed up and pretty obviously changing mine in a desperate attempt to create a strawman you can easily knock down. I did not say that sexual behavior is solely environmental. I said mostly and I stand by that and unlike you have actually made several posts supporting my position. You on the other hand have claimed repeatedly without a shadow of a doubt that men have higher sex drives than women on average. You have yet to make one post that confirms this as firmly as you do. I'm waiting for you to do so.

 

[PartyHeart]

Lol @ claiming I'm doing the most with a long reply, then proceeds to read a post from someone later in the thread with an even longer reply. That inconsistency reeks of immature intellectual dishonesty and reveals your underlying opinion you either are unable to argue for or simply will not so you can pretend that you haven't directly stated your opinion in this topic.

Because everyone can clearly see that you share the same opinion of the poster that you're nut-hugging in this thread.
Which is why you addressed me in this thread when I was replying to your homie.



In fact now that I see you're purposely wasting my time and trolling me, I'm not replying to you anymore in this thread. In fact you'd be better off sitting this one out and keep on cheering on the sidelines. I actually thought you were more logical than the type to blindly back someone who goes against the scientific consensus and eventually admits in her last sentence that she can't actually prove her theory and finally realized none of the links she cited backed her up either:

Goes against the scientific consensus? Lol. You have literally posted nothing to prove your point. The scientific consensus according to you is thoroughly on your side, yet you cannot post a comparable amount of studies that I have to back your point?

And how hilarious that you are grasping at straws now to say because I am comfortable enough in my position to admit the scientific community does not yet know it all, that I'm realizing I'm wrong. Especially when you said the same thing yourself at the beginning of this debate. You're desperate, stop it.

If you weren't so emotionally invested in believing men have a higher sex drive than women so you can back the behavior you are too afraid to admit that you obviously support in this thread, your argument would probably come off a lot better. Thus far, sans your first couple of posts, it has been extremely poor.

 

[MeachTheMonster]

This is a lot of talk but you have yet to post a study that confirms your POV. I have posted 3. Please provide at least one.

The previous one you linked does not You did not read your own link. Now you are trying to make a very tenuous link between sexual dimorphism -> cognition -> behavior -> sexual behavior. Something your research paper itself did not do.

The one you have posted now again attempts to make claims on female and male sexuality based on reporting. This is something I thoroughly debunked in my first post to you. You have already admitted that social factors are an influencer, yet none of the things you post take that into consideration in their research methodology. You admit that you believe that social and biological factors influence sexual desire, but none of your research attempts to take social factors into account at all. I wonder why that is Especially since all of mine have taken both into consideration.

Lastly, you are getting arguments mixed up and pretty obviously changing mine in a desperate attempt to create a strawman you can easily knock down. I did not say that sexual behavior is solely environmental. I said mostly and I stand by that and unlike you have actually made several posts supporting my position. You on the other hand have claimed repeatedly without a shadow of a doubt that men have higher sex drives than women on average. You have yet to make one post that confirms this as firmly as you do. I'm waiting for you to do so.

Sorry to jump into yalls thing, but y'all are going in circles cause "sex drive" is impossible to quantify. People perceive their sex drive and sexuality in very different ways, so any "science" on the subject is ambiguous at best.

Just my 2 cents