"Argument" implies that it's clash between two positions. This isn't a clash. It's me walking you through this and taking the time out of my day(and night) to teach you about the rudimentary basics of science.
I refuse to allow you to use the fact that you're intellectually handicapped as an excuse to why you don't know any better. I'm going to help you shorty, together we're going to fight your ignorance and help you learn.
For instance, here's your source in it's totality that you cited to back up your claim that women have a higher sex drive than men-
http://indiana.edu/~sexlab/files/pubs/Chivers_Seto_Blanchard_2007.pdf
Lol please actually look at the charts and the descriptive data found this time, ma.
There's mathematical units and there's charts used to illustrate quantitative data involved that I will interpret for you and explain:
Both heterosexual males and homosexual males registered a higher Z score on the chart than both heterosexual females and homosexual women. The Z score represents genital response to stimuli they find sexual.
The females(unlike males)finding non-humans sexually attractive doesn't change that their measured desire to fukk both humans and non-humans is still found to be lower than than males measured desire to fukk humans.
Why are you making this so easy for me? Do you not realize if you cite a source with any form of quantitative data I will not stop until I find the actual data from the study and I will analyzed the apparatus used as well.![]()
So you're blatantly trying to change your argument again and act as if I wouldn't notice?
How did you present evidence for your own argument that talked about frequency of reporting sexual urges, and spend pages arguing that because men reported it more that your point was proven? How did you do that and now you are trying to use z-scores, something you clearly know nothing aboutto talk about intensity and not frequency?
Please explain, and don't do so with prefacing your post was a paragraph trying to hype yourself up and dap pander to sexists. Explain to me how you go from arguing about frequency to intensity and claim to not be grasping at straws? lol
So wait are you admitting to me that you are completely incapable of understanding the meta-analysis that YOUR own link presented.
Did you even read the chart? Because again the data from the study YOU linked (which was extrapolated on the chart) revealed that the males in that study regardless of sexual orientation reacted with more sexual desire to any stimuli they deemed sexual than females regardless of sexual orientation. The study also revealed that females (most notably heterosexual) showed a wider range of the type of stimuli they actually deemed sexual (which includes non-human beings).
This post actually seems beneath you and there's no way I would've guessed you would've posted something like this a couple pages back when I initially responded to you. You have to be trolling me at this point or maybe you just enjoy conversing me with so much, you'll say anything to continue our interaction. That spanking gif, must of have got you thinking wild thoughts.
I bet you like it when a real nikka palm that ass every now and then![]()
If this thread is great, why did you neg me and one star it?Great thread, wish I would've thought of it. lol
Glad to read that some guys' opinoins would change for the worst.
*adds this question to my list of "random" questions to sneak in to convo while trying to determine if a guy is a cheater or not*
Because you said you wouldn't care.If this thread is great, why did you neg me and one star it?
So you need a man to be faithful to you, like you were a woman![]()
So this is a great thread idea, as long as the people giving their opinion has the same one as yoursBecause you said you wouldn't care.
& then you said this about someone who does.
Basically bc I disagree with your opinion. Accept that and move on.![]()
Told you you were being sexistMen support each other against women, especially on topics such as these and especially on here. Cheers though.
So this is a great thread idea, as long as the people giving their opinion has the same one as yours![]()
You're implying that there's a dichotomy between both my evidence and yours. I don't have to reject mine to love the fact that your evidence supports my position.@ the try hard in this post.
Again, Darryn, explain how all this time you presented evidence for your own argument using frequency of reporting sexual urges and now are rejecting evidence about frequency of urges?
Yeah I'm young but I hate case I would keep my distanceAs a man, your word is supposed to be your bond.
If you're married but treating your WIFE like she's a bums sock, how the fukk are you gonna treat others?
Basically I don't fukk with cheaters in any way shape or form.
I ask cuz my uncle been with his wife for over 20 years and everybody knows he cheats
It's an open secret.
He took care of his kids(They grown now) takes care of his wife,
But he has the occasional side piece
I don't see the problem![]()