"As a man you can either be fukkable or be relationship material, but you can't be both."

[Carlton Banks]

Agree or disagree?

 

[CodeBlaMeVi]

Sounds like a question for women.

 

[levitate]

Ho babble wrapped in a FaceBook-like post

 

[Rekkapryde]

Ho babble wrapped in a FaceBook-like post

this nikka spittin

 

[Silver Surfer]

Ho babble wrapped in a FaceBook-like post

 

[FlyGuy]

Involved in both and get plenty offers from outside too

One star

 

[WaveWhisperer]

Sounds like a question for women.

 

[Speaking Womanese]

It sounds like someone tried to reverse what Patrice O’Neal said in his standup.

“Just because I find YOU sex-able doesn’t mean I get to sleep with you, and just because you find ME loveable doesn’t mean I have to love you.”

 

[BrothaZay]

Most people from the hood aren't relationship materiel male or female

 

[Treblemaka]

The best of us are both and in many cases part of the reason we are fukkable is because we are relationship material.

 

[Exlurkernegro]

Disagree, but it depends on the man.


Some men are neither one.

 

[BigMan]

I think a lot of women might agree with that

but overall I disagree with the statement , you can be both just like obviously a woman can be marriage material and fukkable

 

[Deuterion]

Ho babble wrapped in a FaceBook-like post

‘Preach.

 

[BaviKingVA]

hoe babble

1 star

 

[FlexPavilion]

If you're fukkable and relationship material, you cause too much competition anxiety. Some women prefer either a Dusty Daniel to dikk em down and/or a Stable Stanley to provide. Having both in one partner is too much for these type of women.