As a red blooded male, Would you say cheating is normalcy, or its wrong?

[Mickey Kane]

Being faithful or monogamous is social conditioning

But so is wearing clothing

Haha, I like what you did there.

/

To take the conversation elsewhere, do the pros of monogamy outweigh the cons?

 

[Turbulent]

Ahh, yes. More or less what I meant when discussing the concept of a 'high value' man. A high value man can be a 'bum' but I'll theorise that this is more likely to be the case when discussing younger women i.e. 18-25 but as they mature, 'security' becomes increasingly important to their hypergamy & status & resources are more of determinant of 'high value'.

i agree in most cases. but those older chicks are less desirable generally (don't look as good, more emotional baggage...)

 

[JasonSJackson]

wtf does "cheating" even mean? Define that

 

[Mickey Kane]

i agree in most cases. but those older chicks are less desirable generally (don't look as good, more emotional baggage...)

True, true.

I still think even though being high value doesn't strictly necessitate wealth, status, etc...a man should should still very much make those things important on his path to self-improvement. Like you said earlier, a bum can still have his way with women, but he's putting in a lot more work, lol.

 

[Black_Jesus]

Cheating is actually pretty disrespectful

 

[61 Corpses]

Its perfectly normal and should be encouraged.

 

[mcdivit85]

*sighs*
The majority of men in the population aren't 'high value' enough to hold that sort of leverage & make such demands. A woman has to be a couple of levels below you to accept such a condition & frankly, most of the time, that isn't the case.

This.

The reality is, it goes back to another thread in which cheating was discusses...whether a woman would take a "good" man back if he cheated. Well, it depends on how "good" this guy is. Like Meek Mill said, "there's levels to this sh#t."

If you're a guy like Meek Mill, then, yes. You can cheat or flat out tell the woman you're dealing with that there's others. Hell, it most cases she'll already know...I mean, you are Meek Mill. And most likely, she'll suck it up because in the grand scheme of things, you're great amongst average.

On the other hand, if you're John who's an accountant with a regular status and profile amongst your peers, then, no. You can't cheat and/or flat out tell your woman that there's others without reprocussions. One of which may be your chick leaving you.

Cheating is wrong because it implies lying and deceiving a person. A person who should very important to you. The physical aspect is neither here nor there.

Peace

 

[Mickey Kane]

Cheating is actually pretty disrespectful

I would say it's equally cowardly but I think the energy people use to shame & criticise those who cheat would be of better use elsewhere.

 

[Turbulent]

True, true.

I still think even though being high value doesn't strictly necessitate wealth, status, etc...a man should should still very much make those things important on his path to self-improvement. Like you said earlier, a bum can still have his way with women, but he's putting in a lot more work, lol.

yup, especially since all that energy the bum is putting into "game" he culd put into building wealth and health so that he can live longer, more prosperous, less stress AND get those women he wants. you'll be happier in general.

 

[MikelArteta]

Security doesn't have to be monetary, security to many broads as they get older is just getting commitment of exclusivity from a man with morals . But I see what you are saying .

Ahh, yes. More or less what I meant when discussing the concept of a 'high value' man. A high value man can be a 'bum' but I'll theorise that this is more likely to be the case when discussing younger women i.e. 18-25 but as they mature, 'security' becomes increasingly important to their hypergamy & status & resources are more of determinant of 'high value'.

 

[mtu wa chuma]

Cant say im surprised a forum full of effeminate white worshipping c00ns refuse to do what every red blooded male does.

"Oh in order to cheat you must be balling or a billionaire" foh

 

[mcdivit85]

Chances are a relationship will work more smoothly if the man has better self-esteem than the chick because only then will she follow. finding someone with the exact same self-esteem as you is practically impossible and why would she follow someone who she feels better than?

Very true.

A person will only truly submit and follow someone that they feel is above them in some way. People don't fight on battefields, bow their heads and walk ten paces behind someone they deem as their equal. They do that for someone they feel has a value that is worthy of utmost respect and obedience.

You can't expect to have a woman just bow down to the idea of her sharing you UNLESS she feels that your value is high enough to warrant her having a piece of you instead of having all of you...and that would be enough because a piece of your value is more than she can get elsewhere. As its been said before, a woman would rather have a piece of a great man than the whole of a weak man.

Peace

 

[Mr. Somebody]

The taboo of cheating, Do you view the male cheating on his spouse as just a natural thing. Or is it wrong? Why is it wrong? Aren't we programmed to mate with as many as possible?

Its wrong because it hurts and its a form of betrayal which is the worst feeling in the world. It causes your children to grow up dysfunctional as well.

Its so demonic, friends.