Assault weapons are not protected by the 2nd amendment, court rules
- Thread starter Berniewood Hogan
- Start date
ill
Superstar
https://www.nytimes.com/2014/09/14/sunday-review/the-assault-weapon-myth.html?_r=0
Hopefully a full Republican government can figure out a way to overturn this fear mongering nonsense.
Hopefully a full Republican government can figure out a way to overturn this fear mongering nonsense.
88m3
Fast Money & Foreign Objects
ill
Superstar
that's nice, so hand guns kill more people. want to ban those?
gun owners live their lives in fear. it's a surprise they haven't all shot themselves.
No, they don't. People don't walk around with their finger on the trigger waiting for someone to violate.
Hand guns cause far more death than rifles, so yeah, if you're trying to take a stand against gun violence, that is where you'd look to ban weapons. Neither hand guns nor "assault" weapons should be banned.
JahFocus CS
Get It How You Get It
To quote one of our GOATs whose drawing is literally at the top of the page for Black Excellence Month:
Huey P. Newton said:
88m3
Fast Money & Foreign Objects
JahFocus CS
Get It How You Get It
retarded
Disrespect a legendary figure in Afrikan history in the U.S.
You're either a c00n or a cac. Judging by your prepubescent voice and constant caping for Israel, I'll bet on the latter
Run a neg train on this fukkboy if you have any ounce of respect for yourself as a person of Afrikan descent please
88m3
Fast Money & Foreign Objects
wrap yourself in an American flag while you're at it.
you're just as retarded as twism congrats
I never got all these fantasies people have about defending themselves from authoritarian governments just because they got a couple AR15s or whatever 
it's not 1925 anymore, the game has changed so much that if an authoritarian government really wanted to fukk with your shyt, they could easily overpower you with your tetchy little assault rifle. What're you going to do with that thing when it's half a dozen tanks coming at your house, or it's an attack helicopter raining down some .50 cals? You might as well be holding your dikk for all the use that assault rifle will be
Now I ain't saying that means guns should be banned. I got no opinion on the gun control debate either way. All I'm saying is, can people stop with the Hollywood scenarios and rhetoric? You're not going to keep a government honest, unless it wants to be honest, just because you can buy assault rifles at Wal Mart
it's not 1925 anymore, the game has changed so much that if an authoritarian government really wanted to fukk with your shyt, they could easily overpower you with your tetchy little assault rifle. What're you going to do with that thing when it's half a dozen tanks coming at your house, or it's an attack helicopter raining down some .50 cals? You might as well be holding your dikk for all the use that assault rifle will beNow I ain't saying that means guns should be banned. I got no opinion on the gun control debate either way. All I'm saying is, can people stop with the Hollywood scenarios and rhetoric? You're not going to keep a government honest, unless it wants to be honest, just because you can buy assault rifles at Wal Mart
ill
Superstar
I never got all these fantasies people have about defending themselves from authoritarian governments just because they got a couple AR15s or whatever
I don't get why people keep using this line of reasoning.
Why are you completely ignoring how Afghan farmers with rifles held off both the Soviet Union and America?
Did the take heavy casualties? Sure. Did Russia/America "win"? Not a chance.
ill
Superstar
uh-huh
If you have an actual issue with gun violence your focus would be on handguns.
88m3
Fast Money & Foreign Objects
Well that's not a very good example.
For starters the terrain in Afghanistan makes it very difficult for any invading force. This is a country that has never been successfully conquered in history, even Alexander couldn't do it, even the British Empire couldn't do it. America is mostly flat. You don't have vast mountain ranges with lots of caves and hidden mountain passes where guerillas can easily hide out, resupply and come back to fight another day; where they can plan ambushes. Afghanistan is also landlocked. Afghanistan is like the perfect place on earth for an insurgency or guerilla warfare style civilian resistance. In America, the flat terrain makes it much easier for a hostile occupying force to deploy all weapons of war.
Also they had a lot more than rifles. They had MANPADs, anti-aircraft guns, 500 Stinger missiles with 2000 rounds of ammunition... they had serious heat, they were armed to the teeth by the CIA.
"According to a 1993 US Air Defense Artillery publication, the Mujahideen gunners used the supplied Stingers to score approximately 269 total aircraft kills in about 340 engagements, a 79-percent kill ratio.[24] Which if accurate, would make it responsible for over half of the 451 Soviet aircraft losses in Afghanistan.[21]"
ill
Superstar
Owning firearms doesn't equate to mental illness.
Indiscriminate killing = mental illness.
Bolded shows you're fear mongering. All those people are being gunned down by handguns, not AR's. So if you really care about people being gunned down, you'd focus on handguns. 3% of murders are committed by licensed firearms holders. That means 97% should never have gotten weapons in the first place, so your artificial ban of "assault" weapons does absolutely ZERO to address the gun violence issue.