At this stage of his career, Does a ring do anything for Russell Westbrook's legacy?

CantStop

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
46,738
Reputation
9,187
Daps
210,579
The only poster I remember remotely supporting Russ on occasion was @CantStop, but ok breh.

Respect.

Russ was frustrating at times but he was clearly and I mean clearly made to be a scapegoat by Bron and Klutch. He was put in a bad position and was getting underserved hate. Out of all the teams still alive, I hope Denver wins for Russ.
 

L&HH

Veteran
Joined
May 18, 2012
Messages
53,492
Reputation
5,890
Daps
162,321
Reppin
PG x MD
I don’t know if it does anything for his legacy but I’m sure it would mean the world to him on a personal level. He’s been told u can’t win with Russ since damn near the 2012 Finals if not before that.
The can’t win with Russ is with him as a primary piece. I think everyone knows you could possibly win with him in a limited role as a 6th man….maybe
 

Pseudo

All Star
Joined
Sep 29, 2015
Messages
2,615
Reputation
303
Daps
8,180
He's past his prime and not even the second option on the team so it's not going to change his placement on anybody's all-time list, but it's still a ring.
 

horizon

Veteran
Joined
May 11, 2015
Messages
14,591
Reputation
7,028
Daps
67,844
Winning a ring in this role when everyone was convinced he was an unplayable cancer would do wonders.
On the contrary winning in this role would prove his critics right that and that it’s unfortunate he had to be humbled to such an extent before ditching his ego and putting the team before himself
 
Joined
Jan 19, 2017
Messages
36,554
Reputation
-9
Daps
89,747
championships are a function of multiple moving parts coming together:

players
coaching
upper management

players are only in control of one of those things

why yall insist on acting like players are the only part of the puzzle never ceases to amaze me

:unimpressed:

Because more times than not these guys aren’t just “overmatched” nor do they play pristine basketball absolving them of culpability

Name a great player on years they didn’t win and there’s a good chance they didn’t come through for their team at some point

Don’t play fukking dumb
 
Joined
Jan 19, 2017
Messages
36,554
Reputation
-9
Daps
89,747
No, this does nothing for his legacy, but be a nice ribbon on his end of career...

When we discuss players, we are talking about them in their primes and at their peaks. When we talk about Jordan, we not talking about Wizards Mike unless Wizards Mike is specifically brought up...

We not talking about post-Achilles Kobe, unless the post-Achilles period is specifically mentioned...

We not talking about post-back injury Bird unless '90 Bird is a specific topic of conversation...

When we say "Mike" or "Kobe" or "Bird" we are talking about when those guys were at their heights. I'm using those three as examples, but this applied to every great player. Subconsciously we all understand this...

So this also correlates to championships. We count every title but literally nobody looks at old man, role player rings the same way as #1 rings, unless they are trying to win an argument. No one looks at #2 rings the same way as #1 rings, unless they are trying to win an argument...

Subconsciously we know the difference between Kevin McHale, Scottie Pippen, Sam Jones rings, guys who never won a title as #1's, and Mike or LeBron rings, who ONLY won rings as #1's...

To that point though, there are plenty guys who won rings as #2's or role players and also won as #1's: Kobe, Wade, Kawhi, Parker, Duncan, Havlicek, etc. Its not a super short list...

But we also distinguish guys who only won as #2's or lesser. Jaylen Brown will always be looked at in the Pippen or McHale zone unless he leads a team as a true #1...

For Westbrook, had he and Durant pulled off a title in his prime, he'd be viewed more favorably, being viewed as a McHale or Pippen would be a higher historic standing than he's given now...

He couldn't even come close to a championship run when he was a #1...

I don't think Denver will win it this year. But if they did, its a nice bow on his career but when people think about "Westbrook" they'll more remember when he was in his prime------>that Westbrook couldn't lead championship runs, and couldn't be the second best player on a championship run...

Completely disagree

Russ’ story was an uber athletic hyper competitive guy that didn’t get “it” which potentially cost him a championship/s during his heyday

That sentiment never changed throughout his career but he’s finally bought in at the tail end of his career where’s he’s still heavily relied upon

If he helps them win it all it will be seen as a breakthrough
 
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
17,908
Reputation
-466
Daps
57,996
Reppin
NULL
Because more times than not these guys aren’t just “overmatched” nor do they play pristine basketball absolving them of culpability

Name a great player on years they didn’t win and there’s a good chance they didn’t come through for their team at some point

Don’t play fukking dumb
again...since youre slow....:gucci:


i said:

players
coaching
upper management

ALL play a role in a championship happening......
nowhere in this did i say players are absolved.....

care to try again?

:unimpressed:
 
Top