Religion/Spirituality At what point in the Bible..

[intilectual recipricol]

I never said anything against you not believing in something unless presented evidence.

Are you reaching for a win?

reaching? I asked if you were agnostic to Logdor or are you a believer. Keep in mind the only reason you even woke up today is by the grace of Logdor who devoured yahweh. Logdor does so many great things here on earth... created the first car.

Are you a believer in Logdor?

 

[the cac mamba]

Pol pot regime.

yea, theres those regimes. i dont think you can link it not believing in god though, since people who believe in god cause death and destruction as well.

 

[Orbital-Fetus]

Flying Spaghetti Monster better be careful...Logdor might eat him too.

 

[Sensitive Blake Griffin]

Flying Spaghetti Monster better be careful...Logdor might eat him too.

You've never heard of Shangala? He's about to feast on the flying spaghetti monster and Logdor, he is the true almighty god

 

[Orbital-Fetus]

You've never heard of Shangala? He's about to feast on the flying spaghetti monster and Logdor, he is the true almighty god

i'm rolling with Logdor.
Shangala fell off after they started making bootleg idols of him in China.

 

[Blackout]

reaching? I asked if you were agnostic to Logdor or are you a believer. Keep in mind the only reason you even woke up today is by the grace of Logdor who devoured yahweh. Logdor does so many great things here on earth... created the first car.

Are you a believer in Logdor?

I never said that you can't be agnostic to many things.

Your reaching so hard for a W.

Doesn't help that your applying Christian rules to me even though I'm not Christian.

I guess your too used to arguing with Christians and not someone with a firm ground to stand on.

yea, theres those regimes. i dont think you can link it not believing in god though, since people who believe in god cause death and destruction as well.

Yes people. That's the focus. Even without religion people would still be doin the same shyt under a different label.

Atheism isn't exempt to corruption bro.

 

[Blackout]

Sorry for the wait. I went to the gym and came back.

 

[intilectual recipricol]

@7Revo,

You can tell us whatever version of god you believe in, it doesnt matter. Unless youre a deist, the same arguments destroy your SPAG as well. The fact that there are literally as many versions of god as there are believers in gods is evidence in itself that gods are made up.

But I dont mind disproving your version of god... tell us about it

 

[Blackout]

@7Revo,

You can tell us whatever version of god you believe in, it doesnt matter. Unless youre a deist, the same arguments destroy your SPAG as well. The fact that there are literally as many versions of god as there are believers in gods is evidence in itself that gods are made up.

But I dont mind disproving your version of god... tell us about it

I believe that there is a higher power out there. It's like an idea thats forming based on each discovery we make.

It's that simple. Go ahead and try to disprove it.

 

[intilectual recipricol]

I believe that there is a higher power out there. It's like an idea thats forming based on each discovery we make.

It's that simple. Go ahead and try to disprove it.

No, tell us more. If there is no more then your god is irrelevent anyways, kinda pointless for you to even argue it. Does your version of god intervene in the world? Come on give us the details.

 

[Blackout]

No, tell us more. If there is no more then your god is irrelevent anyways, kinda pointless for you to even argue it. Does your version of god intervene in the world? Come on give us the details.

He might intervene in the world but who knows why but the being himself. He could even be opereating within the rules that we are folowing with a better understanding than us.

I'm not here to dictate but to discover.

I'm just here to see if my theory is correct in the coming years. You may call it irrelevant but all it takes is one discovery to make you think otherwise. I look toward the future not the present.

I'm not arguing for my belief because it cannot be disproven.

 

[intilectual recipricol]

He might intervene in the world but who knows why but the being himself. He could even be opereating within the rules that we are folowing with a better understanding than us.

I'm not here to dictate but to discover.

I'm just here to see if my theory is correct in the coming years. You may call it irrelevant but all it takes is one discovery to make you think otherwise. I look toward the future not the present.

I'm not arguing for my belief because it cannot be disproven.

You dont even have a belief. Youve imagined a possible "nothing" and then said "who knows what it might do"

on the real, you need to ask yourself what questions youre tryin to answer with your possible belief in something that may or may not do anything in the real world....

but I do have an argument even against your version of whatever... I'll post it tomorrow in the K Crady thread

 

[Blackout]

You dont even have a belief. Youve imagined a possible "nothing" and then said "who knows what it might do"

on the real, you need to ask yourself what questions youre tryin to answer with your possible belief in something that may or may not do anything in the real world....

but I do have an argument even against your version of whatever... I'll post it tomorrow in the K Crady thread

I call it a forming idea. While we make discoveries I'm sure many people have ideas about what might be out there.

To go against that is to be close minded. Do you really spend your life going against anything even remotely close to a higher power?

Hate it all you want tho cuz it doesn't go against science so.

 

[intilectual recipricol]

I call it a forming idea. While we make discoveries I'm sure many people have ideas about what might be out there.

To go against that is to be close minded.

Hate it all you want tho cuz it doesn't go against science so.

Well, yes, it does go against science. Because you have no theory, no problem, no nothing. All you have is "maybe X exists" and "maybe X does stuff, maybe it doesnt"

You have literally nothing.

Science says, "if _____, then ______" then goes about testing it. But it starts out with some sort of problem or question that needs solving.

 

[Blackout]

Well, yes, it does go against science. Because you have no theory, no problem, no nothing. All you have is "maybe X exists" and "maybe X does stuff, maybe it doesnt"

You have literally nothing.

Science says, "if _____, then ______" then goes about testing it. But it starts out with some sort of problem or question that needs solving.

How can that go against science? Making a guess as to what is out there is as natural as breathing.

To say it doesn't benefit science is one thing but that doesn't mean it goes against science especially when I'm willing to throw it away if future discoveries say otherwise.

Looks like you let your bias against A higher power warp your thoughts and your not even aware of it.