One final post, because I'm not about go continue dropping shyt that you should have picked up in high school
"Science" says nothing about the existence of God because the concept of God is unfalsifiable. You can't test things that are designed in such a way that there's no outcome of an experiment that rejects the hypothesis. Supernatural beings such as God are simply not relevant from an empirical point of view because they do not add anything to our knowledge of the universe.
Heck, even if God existed, what would that change scientifically?
Nothing, because you'd still be doing experiments and follow the scientific method to get new reliable data that can be used to further our knowledge. The point of the scientific method is that it provides measurable data through hypothesis that anyone can replicate - we know the stuff is true because it's tested over and over again. Compare that to the interpretation of religious texts that vary from person to person, denomination to denomination.
Brehs, feel free to believe in God, there's nothing wrong with religion so long as you don't try to mess up our schools by changing science books just because of what the Bible or the Quran has said. When you try to argue against our evolutionary origin (no, there's no debate to be had, mankind and apekind share a common ancestor, we didn't pop out of nowhere) or that salt water and fresh water cannot blend, you're taking it too far
And don't bring up shyt like "teach the controversy" or that kids should be taught "both alternatives" as if the merit of both them is equal

That's what some religious folks are banking on, because they know that science can be confusing, go against your gut instincts, and just be overall weird. You expect a young kid to be equipped to pick between an easy answer and a hard answer?
Fact is, it's easy to say explain away countless of phenomena with "because God", while the scientific answers sometimes requires months if not years of understanding.
