Atheists Of Higher Learning, Come Explain what existed before the Big Bang

[CHL]

What evidence? If evolution was true, then why monkeys are still around? And if your evolution is just a "theory" then why scientist don't believe in gravity?

But like you said, we believe in what we want to believe. When the time comes we'll see who's right.

Not this ignorant garbage again. Why does every moronic creationist (you must be one) have such an urge to display their ignorance on evolution by using the usual "Why are there still monkeys" rhetoric? We share a common ancestor with monkeys, no one with a shred of education has ever stated that humans evolved from them.

 

[Kenny West]

How did I miss this thread. atheists can't make no functional arguments when it isn't about complaining about religion. Why don't yall fukkboys go disbelieve in oxygen next

 

[NoMayo15]

How did I miss this thread. atheists can't make no functional arguments when it isn't about complaining about religion. Why don't yall fukkboys go disbelieve in oxygen next

I agree 100%. Atheists can't make no functional arguments and theists can't make functional arguments when it comes to religion.

 

[Ikwa]

It came out of nowhere

Something was created out of nothing

This phone I'm holding just created itself but I don't know how :mjkkk:

 

[CHL]

It came out of nowhere

Something was created out of nothing

This phone I'm holding just created itself but I don't know how :mjkkk:

Just like the sky genie came out of nowhere?

 

[Ethnic Vagina Finder]

We haven't even advanced as a civilization to travel to the closest star. We still beating around the bush to go to Mars. So how is man supposed to be able to explain the cosmos and are existence?

And they call it the big bang THEORY for a reason. Its a fukking theory.

Man use to think the earth was flat and that the planets and sun rotated around the earth. Maybe it will take another 2000 years before man unlocks the secrets of the universe.

 

[NoMayo15]

We haven't even advanced as a civilization to travel to the closest star. We still beating around the bush to go to Mars. So how is man supposed to be able to explain the cosmos and are existence?

And they call it the big bang THEORY for a reason. Its a fukking theory.

Man use to think the earth was flat and that the planets and sun rotated around the earth. Maybe it will take another 2000 years before man unlocks the secrets of the universe.

I partially agree with you. We aren't at some type of zenith of human knowledge, and people who think they know all the answers are idiots, or dishonest. But, as far as one could know anything, there are some things we do know.

A THEORY in science isn't just some kind of guess. Theories are ideas supported by so much evidence and so many facts that they are practically considered true. Of course we don't have absolute knowledge, but as far as practical knowledge, anything that's considered a theory is a known fact about the universe. The theory of gravity isn't less true because it's considered a theory. It's like saying germs don't exist because germ theory is JUST a theory. It's an easy mistake though, because of the way we use the term theory in everyday speech. It doesn't have the same meaning when used in a scientific context. Plus, throw in the piss poor science education in schools, and it's easy to see why someone would say something like that.

Men thought the Earth was flat because it seems intuitive. Using your senses today you can't tell you're walking along the edge of a spherical object. That's why theists kill me when they say certain scientific concepts don't make sense logically (only to conclude that God is the only rational explanation for the universe/diversity of life/etc.). What "makes sense" or "seems impossible/improbable" is not necessarily the best pathway to truth. Sometimes what's true about our universe, like a round Earth, is counter-intuitive.

 

[Shogun]

no one knows, thats the answer.

I know. I figured it out after 15 minutes of youtube research

 

[the cac mamba]

So not one atheist has even attempted to answer my question in the OP.

humans dont know, and im not arrogant enough to claim i do

meanwhile, religious fools claim that theyre on a first name basis with the entity that both created the universe, and cares about their daily problems

is 'enough' for religious fools to fall back on "god was always just there" and you arent allowed to question it, so why do we have to answer the OP

 

[Ethnic Vagina Finder]

I partially agree with you. We aren't at some type of zenith of human knowledge, and people who think they know all the answers are idiots, or dishonest. But, as far as one could know anything, there are some things we do know.

A THEORY in science isn't just some kind of guess. Theories are ideas supported by so much evidence and so many facts that they are practically considered true. Of course we don't have absolute knowledge, but as far as practical knowledge, anything that's considered a theory is a known fact about the universe. The theory of gravity isn't less true because it's considered a theory. It's like saying germs don't exist because germ theory is JUST a theory. It's an easy mistake though, because of the way we use the term theory in everyday speech. It doesn't have the same meaning when used in a scientific context. Plus, throw in the piss poor science education in schools, and it's easy to see why someone would say something like that.

Men thought the Earth was flat because it seems intuitive. Using your senses today you can't tell you're walking along the edge of a spherical object. That's why theists kill me when they say certain scientific concepts don't make sense logically (only to conclude that God is the only rational explanation for the universe/diversity of life/etc.). What "makes sense" or "seems impossible/improbable" is not necessarily the best pathway to truth. Sometimes what's true about our universe, like a round Earth, is counter-intuitive.

Theory is best guess. And theories are always challenged and rechallenged to either proved otherwise or reconfirm. Einstiens theory of relativity could be bullshyt but that's all we have to go on because it hasn't been proven otherwise.

 

[NoMayo15]

Theory is best guess. And theories are always challenged and rechallenged to either proved otherwise or reconfirm. Einstiens theory of relativity could be bullshyt but that's all we have to go on because it hasn't been proven otherwise.

No, that's not how it works at all. Theories aren't just guesses we accept until proven otherwise. Theories have to have facts to support them...it's the highest achievement point for a hypothesis. It has nothing to do with "guessing". I don't want to get too caught up on the semantics of this, but every bit of language you use seems to indicate that you don't understand what theories are, and think a scientific theory is the same as what a layman means when he uses theory. It's a false equivocation.

 

[Sensitive Blake Griffin]

No, that's not how it works at all. Theories aren't just guesses we accept until proven otherwise. Theories have to have facts to support them...it's the highest achievement point for a hypothesis. It has nothing to do with "guessing". I don't want to get too caught up on the semantics of this, but every bit of language you use seems to indicate that you don't understand what theories are, and think a scientific theory is the same as what a layman means when he uses theory. It's a false equivocation.

dudes name is ethnic vagina finder bruh

 

[NoMayo15]

dudes name is ethnic vagina finder bruh

Good point.

 

[↓R↑LYB]

So you're believe in a event that has no logical explanation or any understanding of what caused it to happen? Isn't this against the atheists belief system?

I know I'm mad late but atheism isn't a belief system no more than me not believing in the tooth fairy is a belief system.