You presume they don't. I didn't say there was evidence that they do either.
Stop ASSUMING things. This is the entire flaw in your argument.
You think cats gather in groups and discuss far away galaxies and constellations in cat language? And I'm the one who's crazy?

So what, you period sponge
I have many more.
Such phrases are reserved for functional idiots.
"science of my logic"
Oh go fukk yourself. Idiot.
o modular logic has nothing to do with your god existing.
I'm not religious, I only claimed to believe in intelligent design, and to believe that my claim is true.
Stop bytching about the frame of debate and address why your god has no evidence of it's existence.
All you can do is whine and moan and try to shift the argument to definitions or syntax or specious understandings of logical fallacies without addressing that you live in a world that has corrupted your mind into believing in a supernatural entity on shytty evidence.
1)
I specifically stated on more than one occasion that I personally believe in intelligent design, and I claim that much to be true, now whether the intelligent design is the work of an Abrahamaic God or an alien species, I can't confirm at this point.
2) Now, if you REALLY want to take it there, I can start another thread on Intelligent Design, present my theories/proofs, and allow you the chance to disprove it.
Please tell me you wanna take it there, been itching to put some intellectual work in 
No dumbass.
Asserting disbelief is NOT the same as not having a belief.
This is correct, when you are assert a disbelief, you claim your disbelief is true. That is 100% correct, I completely agree with this statement, logically and quantitatively
#dualities

#dualities

