Auburn aint spit, LSU aint spit, the SEC aint spit

[The ADD]

Cmon man, yall keep damn near consistent top 10 recruiting classes and complaining?

Rivals.com
2017 Football Scout Team Rankings

I'm looking at these shyts year by year....cmon dog.

It's more nuanced then that. CMR was terrible at roster management in terms of replacing guys that left. UGA routinely had 3-4 scholarships unfilled towards the end. That stuff matters when you are trying to win championships and you are down numbers.

 

[PortCityProphet]

That doesn't really mean anything..............................

Exactly. Moral victories are for minor league programs.














Like Georgia, Tennessee, Florida, Missouri, Auburn, Vandy, Kentucky, Texas A&M, Ole Miss, Mississippi State, LSU, South Carolina, and Arkansas

 

[The ADD]

Exactly. Moral victories are for minor league programs.














Like Georgia, Tennessee, Florida, Missouri, Auburn, Vandy, Kentucky, Texas A&M, Ole Miss, Mississippi State, LSU, South Carolina, and Arkansas

It's like that Fam.

 

[ReturnOfJudah]

We coming for that ass

 

[Da_Eggman]

 

[Rekkapryde]

We coming for that ass

I don't even know what yall coach saying half the time...and I'm from the Lowcountry of SC

 

[PortCityProphet]

We coming for that ass

 

[DropTopDoc]

we can't pick and choose when we want to say we got the top ranked this and then complain about the talent ain't good.

Well one could argue, having a top ranked class on paper is one thing, them being top ranked on the field is another, especially when the rubber has to meet the road, and finally the level of coaching and scheming to utilize said talent is another story.

So I get the notion of moving the goal post, but in the same breath, we can agree in the years of AJ green and a little before and after, I remember a large number of dogs being in and out the 1st round and legit NFL talent from the trenches to the skill positions

And quite as it's kept, you all used to put out a bit of secondary talent too

 

[Sauce Dab]

Exactly. Moral victories are for minor league programs.














Like Georgia, Tennessee, Florida, Missouri, Vandy, Kentucky, Texas A&M, Ole Miss, Mississippi State, LSU, South Carolina, and Arkansas

Fixed that for ya

 

[...o3]

...the inner-conference bickering threads like this one and the monthly (insert osu coli fan here___) going at (insert michigan coli fan here___) threads, always delivers. y'all are the real MVPs.

 

[Rekkapryde]

Well one could argue, having a top ranked class on paper is one thing, them being top ranked on the field is another, especially when the rubber has to meet the road, and finally the level of coaching and scheming to utilize said talent is another story.

So I get the notion of moving the goal post, but in the same breath, we can agree in the years of AJ green and a little before and after, I remember a large number of dogs being in and out the 1st round and legit NFL talent from the trenches to the skill positions

And quite as it's kept, you all used to put out a bit of secondary talent too

They still do have a lot of players in the pros too. Maybe not "stars" but they have a ton of talent in the league.

NFL Players by College - G - National Football League - ESPN

To act like they are working with chumps is ridiculous. Just because they aren't "glamour" doesn't mean they are working with lesser talent. If you wanna say that Richt didn't get the most outta that raw talent, I can see an argument there. But they keep talent. I don't wanna hear that bullshyt.

 

[8====D]

Roll Tide!!! :alright:

(fukk UGA)

 

[Field Marshall Bradley]

Too many teams with comparable talent,

Dude, no team in the SEC has talent like Bama... only LSU is a close second.....

 

[Rekkapryde]

Dude, no team in the SEC has talent like Bama... only LSU is a close second.....

Recruiting classes say otherwise.

LSU, Florida, Auburn, UGA absolutely have compareable talent as far as recruiting rankings are concerned.

Clemson's ratings were even lower than those schools.

Coach dem nikkaz up better.

 

[DropTopDoc]

They still do have a lot of players in the pros too. Maybe not "stars" but they have a ton of talent in the league.

NFL Players by College - G - National Football League - ESPN

To act like they are working with chumps is ridiculous. Just because they aren't "glamour" doesn't mean they are working with lesser talent. If you wanna say that Richt didn't get the most outta that raw talent, I can see an argument there. But they keep talent. I don't wanna hear that bullshyt.

I think you are missing my point, or I'm not doing a good enough job clearly speaking on my point, yes you are still getting talent, I whole heartedly agree with you, but to me, you guys had way more back in the day then the past couple years,

I also am saying just because (insert rankings program here) says you had whatever number class, does not mean you had great talent, talent on paper, and on the field do not co-exist equally, but even more importantly what you scheme said talent into.