Australia cuts Clinton foundation off.....no more "donations"

ⒶⓁⒾⒶⓈ

Doctors without Labcoats
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
7,180
Reputation
-2,210
Daps
14,762
Reppin
Payments accepted Obamacare,paypal and livestock
:sas2: you hear that loud sucking sound


thats the swamp draining :ahh:


Why was Australia donating millions to Hillary Clinton’s foundation?



AUSTRALIA has finally ceased pouring millions of dollars into accounts linked to Hillary Clinton’s charities.

Which begs the question: Why were we donating to them in the first place?

The federal government confirmed to news.com.au it has not renewed any of its partnerships with the scandal-plagued Clinton Foundation, effectively ending 10 years of taxpayer-funded contributions worth more than $88 million.

The Clinton Foundation has a rocky past. It was described as “a slush fund”, is still at the centre of an FBI investigation and was revealed to have spent more than $50 million on travel.

Despite that, the official website for the charity shows contributions from both AUSAID and the Commonwealth of Australia, each worth between $10 million and $25 million.

News.com.au approached the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade for comment about how much was donated and why the Clinton Foundation was chosen as a recipient.

A DFAT spokeswoman said all funding is used “solely for agreed development projects” and Clinton charities have “a proven track record” in helping developing countries.

Australia jumping ship is part of a post-US election trend away from the former Secretary of State and presidential candidate’s fundraising ventures.

1c26e40cfc5e69576ef0342dbef8ad67

A screengrab from the Clinton Foundation donation page.Source:Supplied

Norway, one of the Clinton Foundation’s most prolific donors, is reducing its contribution from $20 million annually to almost a quarter of that, Observerreported.


One reason for the drop-off could be increased scrutiny on international donors. The International Business Times reported in 2015 on curious links between donors and State Department approval.

IBT wrote that the State Department approved massive commercial arms sales for countries which had donated to the Clinton charity.

More than $165 billion worth of arms sales were approved by the State Department to 20 nations whose governments gave money to the Clinton Foundation, data shows.

The counties buying weapons from the US were the same countries previously condemned for human rights abuses. They included Algeria, Saudi Arabia and Kuwait.

But what does Australia gain from topping up the Clinton coffers? The Australianreported in February that Australia was “the single biggest foreign government source of funds for the Clinton Foundation” but questions remain unanswered about the agreement between the two parties.

“It’s not clear why Canberra had to go through an American foundation to deliver aid to Asian countries (including Indonesia, Papua New Guinea and Vietnam). There is now every chance the payments will become embroiled in presidential politics.”

The Daily Telegraph wrote in October that “Lo and behold, (Julia Gillard) became chairman (of the Clinton-affiliated Global Partnership for Education) in 2014”, one year after being defeated in a leadership ballot by Kevin Rudd.

5f7af9ab8443a502618bf1b178cb7849

Hillary Clinton’s Foundation has been at the centre of a number of controversies. Picture: Mandel Ngan/AFPSource:AFP

Australia cutting ties with the Clinton charities is surprising given Foreign Minister Julie Bishop’s years of support.

In a press release dated September 22, 2014, Ms Bishop committed to five years of support for the Clinton Health Access Initiative, the sister organisation of the Clinton Foundation.

“Since 2006, Australia has contributed $88 million to CHAI,” the statement read.

The Clinton Foundation has been linked to a number of scandals. One involved Russian uranium, another involved aid to earthquake-hit Haiti and a third involved Swiss banking giant UBS AG.

President-elect Donald Trump promised to follow through with an investigation into the foundation if he became leader of the free world. But this week he backed away from that stance.

“I don’t want to hurt the Clintons, I really don’t,’’ he told The New York Times.

“She went through a lot and suffered greatly in many different ways, and I am not looking to hurt them at all. The campaign was vicious.”

:pachaha: wheres @Darth Humanist
 

88m3

Fast Money & Foreign Objects
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
94,000
Reputation
3,915
Daps
167,521
Reppin
Brooklyn
@88m3 explain your aversion towards Trump when presented with this blatant pay for play fukkery ?

Obvious biased article from Murdoch Corp.


My aversion to Trump? The guy is an ignorant bigot who has terrible economic policies, and is stacking his cabinet positions with white supremacists and corporate interests.



It's not my fault you can't see the trees in the forest.
 

ⒶⓁⒾⒶⓈ

Doctors without Labcoats
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
7,180
Reputation
-2,210
Daps
14,762
Reppin
Payments accepted Obamacare,paypal and livestock
Obvious biased article from Murdoch Corp.


My aversion to Trump? The guy is an ignorant bigot who has terrible economic policies, and is stacking his cabinet positions with white supremacists and corporate interests.



It's not my fault you can't see the trees in the forest.
:lolbron: Yeah ..nice try ...Murdoch LOATHES Donald trump...You and Murdoch were actually on the same side this election (acting as if you couldnt tell from FOX news coverage anyway)

The parent company of Fox News has helped to finance the career of Hillary Clinton. In fact, the company has helped a lot.
21st Century Fox/News Corp. ranks ninth on the list of the top “corporate and union donors to the Clintons over two decades,” according to a little-noticed list compiled by The Wall Street Journal in 2014. The list counts donations from “companies, foundations, and employees.”

21st Century Fox also ranks as the 13th biggest contributor to Hillary Clinton during her political career, according to a database maintained by the Center for Responsive Politics. The database credits the Rupert Murdoch-owned company as having pitched in $340,936 to her campaigns. That puts Fox just below Lehman Brothers, but eleven spots below second-place Goldman Sachs, on the pro-Clinton list.

“The organizations themselves did not donate, rather the money came from the organizations’ PACs, their individual members or employees or owners, and those individuals’ immediate families. Organization totals include subsidiaries and affiliates,” the database notes.

Murdoch’s charitable foundation and his son James are also contributors to the Clinton Foundation, which is now reportedly being examined by the FBI, which is investigating Hillary Clinton for possible Espionage Act violations regarding her private email use and also possible instances of public corruption regarding the Foundation.

The News Corporation Foundation is listed on the Clinton Foundation website as a donor to the tune of between $500,001 and $1,000,000, placing it alongside progressive donor heavyweights like Peter Lewis and Paul Newman’s foundation.
.

The Don saw through Murdochs duplicity early in the game and bounced out the FOX sponsored debate took his message straight to the people


and here we are now :win:
 

88m3

Fast Money & Foreign Objects
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
94,000
Reputation
3,915
Daps
167,521
Reppin
Brooklyn
Yeah ..nice try ...Murdoch LOATHES Donald trump...You and Murdoch were actually on the same side this election (acting as if you couldnt tell from FOX news coverage anyway)



The Don saw through Murdochs duplicity early in the game and bounced out the FOX sponsored debate took his message straight to the people


and here we are now


full
 

the cac mamba

Veteran
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
111,903
Reputation
14,185
Daps
317,102
Reppin
NULL
:lolbron: Yeah ..nice try ...Murdoch LOATHES Donald trump...You and Murdoch were actually on the same side this election (acting as if you couldnt tell from FOX news coverage anyway)



The Don saw through Murdochs duplicity early in the game and bounced out the FOX sponsored debate took his message straight to the people


and here we are now :win:
that fakkit one starred the thread for good measure :mjlol:

what the fukk is there even to be biased about? did they stop donating or not? i mean unless they blatantly lied about that, fukk is there to even spin?
 

Cynic

Superstar
Joined
Jan 7, 2013
Messages
16,322
Reputation
2,332
Daps
35,236
Reppin
NULL
Obvious biased article from Murdoch Corp.


My aversion to Trump? The guy is an ignorant bigot who has terrible economic policies, and is stacking his cabinet positions with white supremacists and corporate interests.



It's not my fault you can't see the trees in the forest.

Facts =/= bias. Australia & Norway are cutting donations ...

Murdoch didn't make this up..... you can't just dismiss this :stopitslime:

Your war mongering she devil would have plunged us all into WWIII
by putting a no fly zone in Syria


Who can't see the forest through the trees now ?


:wow:
 

88m3

Fast Money & Foreign Objects
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
94,000
Reputation
3,915
Daps
167,521
Reppin
Brooklyn
Facts =/= bias. Australia & Norway are cutting donations ...

Murdoch didn't make this up..... you can't just dismiss this

Your war mongering she devil would have plunged us all into WWIII
by putting a no fly zone in Syria


Who can't see the forest through the trees now ?

The fact that they're cutting donations doesn't prove anything either.

The article is biased, there's loaded loaded language throughout, and a complete lack of substance or facts behind it. It's basically a DailyMail article without the pictures.


Did you get your GED out a cereal box?
 

Cynic

Superstar
Joined
Jan 7, 2013
Messages
16,322
Reputation
2,332
Daps
35,236
Reppin
NULL
The fact that they're cutting donations doesn't prove anything either.

The article is biased, there's loaded loaded language throughout, and a complete lack of substance or facts behind it. It's basically a DailyMail article without the pictures.


Did you get your GED out a cereal box?

Loss of presidential candidacy/political influence and subsequent donation cuts

Seems legit.....

I have a Masters degree in Chemical Engineering.....try another shaming tactic Hillbot:hitunes:
 
Last edited:

88m3

Fast Money & Foreign Objects
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
94,000
Reputation
3,915
Daps
167,521
Reppin
Brooklyn
Loss of presidential candidacy/political influence and subsequent donation cuts

Seems legit.....

I have a Masters degree in Chemical Engineering.....try another shaming tactic Hillbot


Prove they're linked.

:manny:

The idea that Australia would have to buy favor from America let alone through the Clinton Foundation is laughable.


:mjlol:
 
Top