I actually think kearse is underrated, hes mostly a deep guy who doesnt run routes well, but hes never recognized as such and never respected on the field UNTIL he catches a bomb or twoBaldwin and Kearse are scrubs.
How often do they catch td's? Almost never, look at their numbers. Kearse never catches anything, so don't react to this once in a blue moon shyt like it's Jordy Nelson and Randall Cobb out there.

I actually think kearse is underrated, hes mostly a deep guy who doesnt run routes well, but hes never recognized as such and never respected on the field UNTIL he catches a bomb or two
otherwise that core is really underwhelming, but it gets the job done for them![]()



38 catches in a season is underrated:dahellwhat::yeah ok:
Not even 550 receiving yards is underrated :dahellwhat::yeah ok:
1 touchdown catch all year for a player who is "mostly a deep guy"...:dahellwhat::yeah ok:
Cole Beasely had more touchdown catches in the 1st half against the bears than Kearse had touchdown catches this entire season
Only on the Coli could dude have 1 good game out of his previous 17 and then all of a sudden he "underrated"
Was he "underrated" when you played the Cardinals and he had that 1 catch for 8 yards![]()

Make's Russell Wilson even more impressive, considering the options he has to work with.
His throws were so accurate tonight.

Can we not do it again with them "scrubs"
Panthers are great against the run.
Who going to stop the Hawks ?
It is all Russ. The dude makes the team go. Plus he has a OC that calls a balanced run game and Wilson has a power back who is one of the best players in the league.
I have always said Wilson is like a young McNabb except Wilson has a great defense (Eagles defense was good not great), a dominant power running game (Eagles always had issues with goal line and short yardage running) and a OC that calls a balanced running game (Eagles running game was never balanced after 2003).
Obviously im nitpicking here but Id consider those defenses great. When Dawkins and Hugh were in their primes the defense was pretty damn good. They fell off when their DC died. The times they didnt play up to their potential was when Ray Rhodes was fukkin up all the time by playing prevent defense and shyt
I hear you but I believe they were never great...good but not great. This Seattle defense is ranked up their with the Bears defense in the mid 80s, Giants defense in the 80s, 2000 Ravens, steeler curtain of the 70s and purple people eaters.
Also that Eagles defense with McNabb and Reid always struggled against the run. Now that Eagles defense of the early 90s with Reggie white, Seth Joyner, Eric Allen, Andre waters, Jerome brown and Clyde Simmons was great. Better than any defense that Reid and McNabb had during the 2000s.
Kearse is a guy you know can do more, guy that still hasn't had his career year yet
Willson was running wild tho, I didn't know he could boogie like that. Zach Miller aint housin shyt like that, upgrade
Well those defenses were all time GOAT contenders. That Eagles defense wasnt on that level.
But from 2000-2004 they finished top 10 in pts allowed each year..top 5 every year but 2003 and finished 2nd three of those years. Reid's offensive playcalling didnt help their numbers...but they had playmakers and came up with big stops. Jim Johnson brought crucial and well-timed blitzes..and when he died the creativity left with him. Again, Im splitting hairs but Id consider them to be a great year to year defense in that era..just not an all time great defense. They were never as good as the defenses you named or the Bucs defense u left out etc. Dawkins/Taylor/Vincent as DB's with Trotter and Douglas manning the LB and DL was top notch.