Baltimore cop acquitted- Why isn't B-More burning

George's Dilemma

Banned
Supporter
Joined
May 27, 2012
Messages
27,793
Reputation
7,372
Daps
136,172
Cosign plus no crime was committed


I can't say I agree on no crime being committed, because truthfully we'll really never know. As CNN reported it............

Prosecutors alleged that after Gray was arrested on a weapons charge, Goodson took him on a "rough ride" in a prisoner van -- a punitive measure police used against unruly subjects.

They said Goodson drove so erratically that he blew through a stop sign and veered into another lane of traffic because of the speed he was traveling, which prosecutors said would have tossed Gray around in the van. This is the point in the ride that prosecutors think Gray sustained his fatal spinal injury.

But Williams dismissed the "rough ride" theory as "inflammatory" and said the state failed to produce evidence of erratic driving or even excessive speed by Goodson. That the officer failed to put a seat belt on Gray, Williams said, does not prove that he intended to take him on a rough ride.

The prosecution also argued that Goodson neglected to provide Gray with proper medical assistance after Gray indicated that he wanted to go to the hospital.
Again, Williams disagreed, saying the officer had no way of knowing the "acute distress" Gray was in at the time.
"How would the average officer without medical training know the severity or the acute distress Mr. Gray was in?" asked Williams,
a former prosecutor who investigated police misconduct cases for the U.S. Justice Department."The State has not proven, beyond a reasonable doubt, that Gray was in need of medical attention."



Was a crime committed? It can't definitively be proven beyond reasonable doubt. We'll never know if that "rough ride" was intentional or negligent. If it's the latter, the most the driver faces is punitive action from the police department, and I'm sure the union will have something to say about that.
 

TRFG

Not who you think
Joined
Mar 7, 2014
Messages
13,798
Reputation
240
Daps
38,518
I can't say I agree on no crime being committed, because truthfully we'll really never know. As CNN reported it............

Prosecutors alleged that after Gray was arrested on a weapons charge, Goodson took him on a "rough ride" in a prisoner van -- a punitive measure police used against unruly subjects.

They said Goodson drove so erratically that he blew through a stop sign and veered into another lane of traffic because of the speed he was traveling, which prosecutors said would have tossed Gray around in the van. This is the point in the ride that prosecutors think Gray sustained his fatal spinal injury.

But Williams dismissed the "rough ride" theory as "inflammatory" and said the state failed to produce evidence of erratic driving or even excessive speed by Goodson. That the officer failed to put a seat belt on Gray, Williams said, does not prove that he intended to take him on a rough ride.

The prosecution also argued that Goodson neglected to provide Gray with proper medical assistance after Gray indicated that he wanted to go to the hospital.
Again, Williams disagreed, saying the officer had no way of knowing the "acute distress" Gray was in at the time.
"How would the average officer without medical training know the severity or the acute distress Mr. Gray was in?" asked Williams,
a former prosecutor who investigated police misconduct cases for the U.S. Justice Department."The State has not proven, beyond a reasonable doubt, that Gray was in need of medical attention."



Was a crime committed? It can't definitively be proven beyond reasonable doubt. We'll never know if that "rough ride" was intentional or negligent. If it's the latter, the most the driver faces is punitive action from the police department, and I'm sure the union will have something to say about that.

A rough drive that cause someone to lose their life is in fact negligent breh but it was a tough case to prove without camera footage and witness accounts
 
Top