"I'm so authentic, I'm not listening to my lawyers" is NEVER a good argument to make - for yourself legally or to convince other people of anything. Very Trump-esque which makes since. That's who he is.
First girl, he claims he has no proof, it's a he said she said, "we saw the world differently" (ie she's liberal, he's MAGA). Yet he spoke with her for nearly 2 months before meeting and she seemed awesome, according to him.
But the second girl is what will probably doom him, and a classic example of why lawyers are ALWAYS right. Girl's mom claims he throws wild parties at Nantucket. He says that never happens, he never invites girls for parties and very rarely invites girls to his home. You don't need to be a lawyer to understand that such a definitive statement means that even one person posting an invite or pictures from a girls party at his house will kill his entire defense. He could be innocent and just a dikk, sure. But if he's proven to be a liar on any of this, it will kill his argument. Which almost makes me wonder whether the reporter has the receipts and was just waiting for him to pull a Trump-like denial. She doesn't have to prove he did anything wrong at this point, just has to show the parties. If they happened.
