Hold the fukk up...You already cry over the internet.
For some attention.
With your little bytch ass posting style.
I hope someone Scottie Pippens your forehead for this nonsense.
To The Arcadium:
I've failed you. I thought that co-signing @Liquid when he advocated for a banning would be enough. But it's not. Clearly.
And to explain: moderators can only ban in special circumstances. The power is for deterring spammers. Our main "banning ability" is simply being able to make a case for such an action. And I didn't make a good enough case.
That's not to say I'm throwing @cook or @Brooklynzson under the bus, but there are times when it's not the greatest system. Times like these. No problem, we'll work through it.
Lastly, Rekka, I apologize. I know you aren't really bothered by BasedPrime, but letting this foolishness continue is not a good look on a multitude of levels, and I will do better next time. Sorry.
You're telling me the multitude of evidence that was thrown at this clown isn't enough to get him banned? And he's in here bragging about that shyt and he still isn't banned? Please tell me I'm reading this wrong. Otherwise I'm disappointed in this site right now.