Battle of the underachievers Twolves vs Thunder

[We Ready]

@Mikey2Toes
I know that's your squad, but how can you explain them losing to these teams and being behind a spurs team without their best player for like 30 games.

You can't lose multiple times to teams you should beat by 20+ points.

Explain these losses:
Indiana loss by 20+
detroit loss by 20+
phoenix
home loss again to detroit
charlotte
miami
washington without john wall at home
memphis without conley
phoenix again
philly at home
milwaukee
brooklyn nets

Had they won these games they would be roughly 39-4 or something like that. But they have multiple losses against bad teams. Explain that

So because they aren't 39-4 with the best record in the NBA, they are underachievers?





@Mikey2Toes , you're a Wolves fan?

 

[Jplaya2023]

So because they aren't 39-4 with the best record in the NBA, they are underachievers?





@Mikey2Toes , you're a Wolves fan?

their not beating the teams they should beat. Their 5-10 vs the east. How can you explain that with their best players sans teague basically playing every game.

 

[We Ready]

their not beating the teams they should beat. Their 5-10 vs the east. How can you explain that with their best players sans teague basically playing every game.

Sometimes teams lose games they are supposed to win. They have won some games they were underdogs in too. Nobody expected the Wolves to be 39-4. Everyone knew it would take some time to come together, along with teams just being off on some nights.


Sure they've lost some games they should have won, also won some they should have lost.....that's the NBA, you just start watching?

 

[Jplaya2023]

Sometimes teams lose games they are supposed to win. They have won some games they were underdogs in too. Nobody expected the Wolves to be 39-4. Everyone knew it would take some time to come together, along with teams just being off on some nights.


Sure they've lost some games they should have won, also won some they should have lost.....that's the NBA, you just start watching?

i get that, but still they should be better in my opinion, no reason the spurs should be ahead of them with all their injuries