I don't want either of that shyt. Gimme me modern day Dice
If it's in the future why they calling it 1944?
Version 1.9.44
1) 1944 could be an expansion similar to the Vietnam expansion of Bad Company 2. It would be EA's way of competing with the Cod 4 remaster.
2) The pictures could very well be fake.
3) ya'll really want that Future shyt?
Why would DICE make 2144 when The Final Stand servers are barely used on consoles? Also, between Advanced Warfare, Halo, Gears, Destiny, and, Ea's other flagship FPS franchise, Titanfall, the market is over saturated with gritty futuristic shooters.
Plus, a WW2 setting would be the return to great Rush centered maps.
It also allows for greater diversity in the map settings. (Campaigns in Europe, Africa, the Pacific, and Russia)
Gameplay wise, It would nerf the vehicles and the combat would be prinarily infantry based. That would lead to more competitive Rush matches and more importantly, it would stress the importance of team work in Conquest.
Overall BF 1944 would be a much more intense game than BF4.