No sir, I ain't that type of nikka.How you know it's a fetish? I don't know what's going on in that pic. Might just be a dikkhead, not a pedophile. You the type of nikka to believe a nikka raped a girl just because the chick says so
I never jump to co clusions and I would like more proof
Not saying the nikka shouldn't be beat up tho
See. This is exactly why I said never jump to conclusions without more proof
Okay fam you got me, damn.See. This is exactly why I said never jump to conclusions without more proof
pedo's a pedo, regardless of gender
Truuupedo's a pedo, regardless of gender
No. It was stupid, not sexual. He isn't a pedo. My younger/baby family members have gummed my fingers, their fingers, their toes, my face, shoulder, and have tried to gum my toes before. That's what they do. But it looks like he purposely put his toe near the baby's mouth so that the baby could gum it. When they're teeth are growing, they gum any/everything and kids are always putting things in their mouth.Hmmmm
It's fukked up but does that make them a pedophile?
That actually explains a lot
I hear it's a chick but it don't really change anything, just thought I'd put that out there
Hold up....the 15-year-old is a girl?
Yeah.....nobody will be calling her a pedo. They'll just say she's gross for doing that shyt
Now if this was a breh.....
It was a girl you non reading comprehending ass.
on pointSee what I mean?
Look at the about-faces in this thread ALREADY now that nikkas realize it was a girl
That actually explains a lot
