BEASTMODE Was NEVER Tackled For a LOSS During The WHOLE GAME
- Thread starter CHICAGO
- Start date
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2012
- Messages
- 42,422
- Reputation
- 3,682
- Daps
- 152,139
- Reppin
- black love, unity, and music
Bevell and Pete made a lot of money on this game.....
HalfwayHandsome
A WALKING LICK #502C0MEUP
SMH
He kept getting stronger as the game wentHE WAS STOPPED AT THE LINE OF SCRIMMAGE TWICE
AND GAINED POSITIVE YARDS ON EVERY OTHER CARRY.
HE HAD A 92% CHANCE OF GETTING THAT YARD.
When they were up by 10...they stopped running the ball
Throwing darts to kearse that bum
I swear he was gaining 3-5 yards a carry. I can't believe they did what they did. Damn. It's like someone ripping up a 200 million dollar lockery ticket right in your face.
OG_StankBrefs
Da Spice...
Just gets worse n worse...
i heard that Carrol didn't like the look of the defense and wanted to essentially get a extra time out if it was imcomplete so they could get downs 3 and 4. But if you hadn't wasted 30-40 seconds before that, there's no need to run that call.
HalfwayHandsome
A WALKING LICK #502C0MEUP
I THINK IT WOULD BE 100 TIMES WORSE IF ROMO THREW THAT PICK
Have a player nicknamed beastmode and not feed the beast on the 1 yard line brehs
Reminds me when the Rams played the Pats in the superbowl. Faulk was avg like 6 yards a carry and Martz stopped feeding him the ball.
All-time sports blunder
West Coast Avenger
West Coastin & Smokin
I think it's clear what the agenda was....have the bruh who listens to management and always does what he is told win the game with a pass.....while the real work horse gets stiffed....
How much time do you need to move the ball one yard?
The more time that ran of the clock the better for the Hawks.