Being realistic doesn't mean you hate women

High Art

👑King of The Salon👑
Supporter
Joined
Mar 11, 2022
Messages
9,617
Reputation
5,091
Daps
51,344
I actually understand where OP is coming from to some extent. Personally, maybe because all the fights I used to get into back in the day, when it comes to action movies (and sometimes video games) my mind subtly asks one question when it comes to action genres: "Can I kick the main character's ass?" If the answer is no, then I don't have much issue accepting what I'm seeing. If the answer is yes, then what I'm seeing becomes harder and harder for me to get into. Sure, I can accept that I'm not fighting the fukker in the film or game and instead it is someone else but hot damn, unless the enemy is worm, I'm having issues. If I have to start jeulzing my own brain, then it's probably not meant for me. This is why I didn't post in that thread. If people like it, ok. But it still looks kinda stupid. Now I feel stupid for devoting this many words to that stupid looking movie. :francis:
 
Joined
Jan 24, 2016
Messages
22,072
Reputation
5,209
Daps
52,012
mane i was discussing a similar topic with a dude last night.
me being realistic: women don't necessarily need a man to raise a child
dude: you hate men... why do you want to replace us :damn:
me: i'm just keeping it 💯💯💯
 

KingDanz

Veteran
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
16,486
Reputation
5,518
Daps
79,517
Reppin
NULL
Breh, NONE of the Predator movies are "realistic". In the previous one a skinny-ass Japanese breh went up against one with nothing but a sword, you think THAT's okay but a crossbow ain't?

Either you believe Predator is an honorable hunter who nerfs himself to match the level of his competition....or you just plain suspend disbelief. There is no where were, "A middle-aged cop with a pistol is good enough to take down advanced alien technology 100s of years beyond human imagination on a super-predator being" but a female Indian warrior with a crossbow is suddenly crossing the line.

Think of it this way. If you drop Danny Glover and his pistol into the middle of the American wilderness in 1700, is ol girl taking him out or not? She shoots him before he even knows she's there.






Bow and arrows were fine when Hawkeye was using them to defeat alien hordes rapid-fire. :pachaha:


Anyone who thinks any of these movies were ever realistic is :mjlol:
The samurai breh going up against The Predator was more about honor. Similar to this..

 

I AM WE ARE

Banned
Joined
Jun 15, 2012
Messages
45,317
Reputation
12,383
Daps
135,919
Reppin
The N.O
I actually understand where OP is coming from to some extent. Personally, maybe because all the fights I used to get into back in the day, when it comes to action movies (and sometimes video games) my mind subtly asks one question when it comes to action genres: "Can I kick the main character's ass?" If the answer is no, then I don't have much issue accepting what I'm seeing. If the answer is yes, then what I'm seeing becomes harder and harder for me to get into. Sure, I can accept that I'm not fighting the fukker in the film or game and instead it is someone else but hot damn, unless the enemy is worm, I'm having issues. If I have to start jeulzing my own brain, then it's probably not meant for me. This is why I didn't post in that thread. If people like it, ok. But it still looks kinda stupid. Now I feel stupid for devoting this many words to that stupid looking movie. :francis:
Insert Liam Neeson
 

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,331
Reputation
19,940
Daps
204,129
Reppin
the ether
Does she beat Hawkeye though :sas2:


Hawkeye so far as we can tell has invincibility in all circumstances beyond self-sacrifice and a magic infinite quiver that constantly produces as many arrows of whatever kinds he needs at all times, so clearly Hawkeye wins.

Hawkeye vs. any member of the Fast and Furious cast is the greater question. :jbhmm:
 

I AM WE ARE

Banned
Joined
Jun 15, 2012
Messages
45,317
Reputation
12,383
Daps
135,919
Reppin
The N.O
mane i was discussing a similar topic with a dude last night.
me being realistic: women don't necessarily need a man to raise a child
dude: you hate men... why do you want to replace us :damn:
me: i'm just keeping it 💯💯💯
Do you think a woman can raise a man better with or without a father figure
 

Kiyoshi-Dono

Veteran
Joined
Oct 11, 2015
Messages
92,762
Reputation
36,745
Daps
495,124
Reppin
Petty Vandross.. fukk Yall
Sunday morning and nikkas mad about fiction
full
 

DaddyFresh

Superstar
Joined
Jul 17, 2013
Messages
10,399
Reputation
-536
Daps
45,433
Reppin
NULL
:beli: y'all gotta stop with this. I can only speak for myself but saying a woman with a cross bow can defeat the predator, or Jennifer Lopez taking taebo is whipping dudes, etc etc is going too far. They're separation in genders for a reason. The same people all enraged when that treh was killing women's swimming.
Men taking down aliens, monsters etc is unrealistic too. shyt they got Idris boxing a lion in his new movie. Only pointing out woman doing crazy shyt in media is incel rhetoric
 

High Art

👑King of The Salon👑
Supporter
Joined
Mar 11, 2022
Messages
9,617
Reputation
5,091
Daps
51,344
me personally i think the more the merrier. but even without, a shorty can be alright and that's facts (see Barack Obama)
A white woman raising a child while single is equatable to a black woman raising a child while single? So white privilege doesn't exist now? Ok.:heh:
 
Top