Bernie Sanders Unveils his Medicare for All Plan

FAH1223

Go Wizards, Go Terps, Go Packers!
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
May 16, 2012
Messages
68,535
Reputation
8,017
Daps
207,825
Reppin
WASHINGTON, DC




The Cost of Not Having Single Payer: $1.4 Trillion Per Year
by PETE DOLACK

You could not devise a worse health care system than that of the United States if you tried. By far the most expensive, with among the worst results.

Perhaps saying “among” the worst results is being too kind. That is an accurate statement if we are simply measuring metrics such as mortality rates and other medical outcomes. But if we consider that tens of millions of United Statesians go without health insurance while none do in any advanced capitalist country (or most any other) — and that tens of thousands annually die because of that lack — then we must reasonably assess the U.S. health care system as the worst.

This is the high cost of private profit in health care. How much? The United States spends more than $1.4 trillion per year than it would otherwise if it had a single-payer system. Such is what happens when a service is left in the hands of the private sector, and allowed to be bent toward profit rather than human need.

To calculate that figure, I took the average per capita health care spending of the three largest EU countries — France, Germany and the United Kingdom — and the neighbor of the U.S., Canada, and compared that average to U.S. per capita spending. The composite average for Britain, Canada, France and Germany for the years 2011 to 2016 is $4,392 per capita per year, converted to U.S. dollars adjusted to create purchasing power parity as reported by the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). Per capital health care spending in the U.S. for 2011 to 2016 averaged $8,924 — more than twice as much! Taking that difference and multiplying by 317 million, the average U.S. population for the five-year period, and the total annual excess comes to $1.44 trillion.



That excess has been steadily increasing. Doing these same calculations for earlier periods found that for the period of 2001 to 2010, the annual average of excess spending was $1.15 trillion. The annual average for the period of 1990 to 2000 was $685 billion.

For 2016, the OECD reports that only nine of the 35 countries surveyed spent more than half of what the U.S. spent on health care, and the second highest spender, Switzerland, spent $2,000 less per capita than did the United States.

Can this astounding amount of spending be accounted for by more health care? Nope. The average length of a hospital stay in U.S. in 2014 was 5.5 days, seventh shortest of 35 countries surveyed by the OECD. The average hospital stay in each of the four core comparison countries (Britain, Canada, France and Germany) was longer — a composite average of 7.6 days.

Paying more for less

So it really comes down to inferior results. The U.S. does well in combating cancer, but poorly in almost every other category of health care measurement. And people in the U.S. pay dearly for the privilege of health care, if they are lucky enough to have access to it. The cost of health insurance continues to rise, and the amount a patient must pay out of pocket before insurance kicks in (the “deductible” in U.S. lingo) is also steadily rising as employers push more of the cost of health insurance on to their employees.

Phillip Longman, discussing this issue for Popular Resistance, wrote:

“Indeed, the inflating cost of health care is the overwhelming reason why most Americans haven’t received a raise in years, and why employers increasingly make use of contract workers rather than taking on new employees that would receive benefits. This year, the total annual cost of health care for a typical family of four covered by a typical employer-sponsored plan surpassed $25,000, according to the actuarial research firm Milliman. Such a family will typically pay more than $11,000 of this cost directly out of its own pockets, through payroll deductions, copayments, and deductibles. They will also pay much more indirectly in foregone wages and other forms of compensation, and quite possibly more yet in the form of unemployment, as employers seek to escape their share of the mounting cost of providing health care for their employees.”

And because health care is dependent on maintaining a full-time job, bosses have more leverage over their employees, who will lose their insurance should they quit their job. Women with lower-paying work or staying at home to raise a family are also put at greater risk as health insurance for themselves and children are tied to their husband’s job, making it more difficult to leave a bad marriage. This dynamic could also apply to any one person in a non-traditional family or within a gay or lesbian household.

Thus it comes as little surprise that the United States is one of two countries in the world that do not provide paid maternity leave for women workers. Hope to get it at work? Good luck with that — only 9 percent of companies offered fully paid maternity-leave benefits to workers in 2014, down from 16 percent in 2008. By contrast, at least two-thirds of countries have mandatory maternity pay for at least 14 weeks, according to an International Labour Organization report.

You might not have it so good, but that is the price to be paid for high profits. An analysis by Forbes magazine found that health technology had the highest profit margin of any of 19 broadly defined industrial sectors, at 20.9 percent, topping even finance, the second highest. Three of the biggest companies — Pfizer, Merck & Co. and Johnson & Johnson — had profit margins of 25 percent or higher. When a separate study broke down profit margins by smaller, more specific industry categories, health care-related industries were three of the six most profitable. Generic pharmaceuticals topped the list, with a margin of 30 percent. Major pharmaceuticals and biotechnology were also among the top six.
 

FAH1223

Go Wizards, Go Terps, Go Packers!
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
May 16, 2012
Messages
68,535
Reputation
8,017
Daps
207,825
Reppin
WASHINGTON, DC
Keeping people sick as a business model

The piles of money vacuumed into pharmaceutical pockets do not sit entirely idle. Big Pharma lavishes vast sums on doctors, state Medicaid officials and regulators to promote their products. Studies have shown that doctors who have received payments from pharmaceutical companies are more likely to prescribe those companies’ medications. But pharmaceutical companies go far beyond wining and dining doctors, or paying them speaking fees. They organize “patient advocacy” groups that pretend to be grassroots organizations. An investigative health reporter, Martha Rosenberg, writes that these front groups fly in “patients” to hearings to ask for expensive drugs to be fast-tracked for approval.

Expensive drugs that have to be taken for years, or even a lifetime, create a business model that “actually wants people sick,” Ms. Rosenberg writes. She says:

“ ‘Mental illness’ is a category deliberately ‘grown’ by Pharma with aggressive and unethical million-dollar campaigns. These campaigns, often unbranded to look like a public service, convince people with real life challenges they are ‘depressed’ or ‘bipolar’ and that their children have ADHD. Despite the Pharma marketing, the New England Journal of Medicine recently reported that the rate of severe mental illness among children and adolescents has actually dropped dramatically in the past generation.”

All this adds up to a 2011 study in the journal Health Policy that ranked the U.S. last in preventing early deaths. Attributing this result to “the lack of universal coverage and high costs of care,” the Commonwealth Fund noted:

“The United States placed last among 16 high-income, industrialized nations when it comes to deaths that could potentially have been prevented by timely access to effective health care. … [O]ther nations lowered their preventable death rates an average of 31 percent between 1997–98 and 2006–07, while the U.S. rate declined by only 20 percent, from 120 to 96 per 100,000. At the end of the decade, the preventable mortality rate in the U.S. was almost twice that in France, which had the lowest rate—55 per 100,000.”

An OECD report found that life expectancy in the U.S. is two years less than the average of OECD countries, a gap that is growing. That statistic isn’t improving at either end of life, as U.S. infant mortality rates are considerably higher than in peer countries. A report prepared by the Peterson Center on Healthcare and the Kaiser Family Foundation explicated this poor performance:

“The U.S. has been slower to improve its infant mortality rate than comparable countries, which we define as countries whose gross domestic products (GDP) and per capita GDP were above average in at least one of the past 10 years. While the infant mortality rate in the U.S. improved by about 13 percent from 2000-2013, the comparable country average improved about 26 percent, according to data from the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.

U.S. infant mortality rates appear to be about 42 percent higher than the comparable country average. Looking into specific measures of infant mortality, it also appears that the U.S. has about 66 percent more neonatal deaths (deaths which occur less than 28 days after birth) than the comparable country average. From 2000 to 2013, neonatal deaths decreased by 13 percent in the U.S. and by 23 percent in comparable OECD countries.”

What’s good for big business is good for big business

With such dismal results, why does such a furious campaign continue to insist on privatized health care? Ideology, of course. Ideology no different than that propagated to insist that government is always bad and private enterprise always better. But government doesn’t have to earn a profit; private enterprise expects to and will pack its bags if it doesn’t. Just as privatization invariably results in higher costs and often poorer quality than when the service was provided by a government agency as a public good, health care is provided far more efficiently when in public hands.

Noting that “high administrative costs and lower quality have also characterized for-profit HMOs” (health maintenance organizations funded by insurance premiums that supervise health care), a Journal of the Canadian Medical Association article provides the following figures for the percentage of revenue that is diverted to overhead:

* For-profit HMOs: 19 percent

* Non-profit plans: 13 percent

* U.S. Medicare program: 3 percent

* Canadian Medicare: 1 percent

Ideology drives the Trump administration and the Republican-controlled Congress to have no problem with adding more than 20 million people to the ranks of the uninsured by attempting to reverse the weak-tea, incremental improvement of Barack Obama’s Affordable Care Act. This is not different from Donald Trump’s chimeric $1 trillion infrastructure program, which is a scam that commits his administration to zero dollars while showering corporations with massive subsidies that would supposedly magically induce private infrastructure investment.

That extra $1.4 trillion paid for health care in the United States is the result of a system designed to deliver corporate profits rather than health care. It’s the “magic of the market” at work. It just isn’t magic for you. In a concise explanation on the Real-World Economics Review Blog, Peter Radford explains:

“Markets, you see, are wonderlands that always and inevitably lead to efficient outcomes. And it is no good any starry eyed liberal tinkering with those outcomes. They are magically correct. By correct we mean that they cannot be improved upon. Economists have this vice like attachment to certain core beliefs. One of those is that, if left unfettered, markets will zero in on an allocation of stuff that can never be improved, especially by meddlesome governments.

The way you get to this particular promised land is by letting the great forces of supply and demand batter away at individual preferences and budgets until all the trading and so on ends with no one able to make another trade without such a trade making someone else worse off. It sounds wonderful. Now to make this all work we have to believe in magic. We have to suspend our intelligence and imagine a world where everyone knows exactly what everyone else is doing, where no one cheats, where everyone is marvelously rational, where they don’t suddenly change their minds, where they can calculate at the speed of light, absorb vast amounts of data, and always — yes always — arrive at precisely that combination of stuff they wanted. Within the constraints of their budget of course.”

Sarcastic, yes, but that is a summation of what passes for economic orthodoxy nowadays. Markets always magically result in fair and just results for all, and any actions by government automatically damage this miraculous machine. And therefore health care should be left in the hands of corporations with as little regulation as possible. And therefore the U.S. is a country in which 22,000 people die and 700,000 go bankrupt per year as a result of inadequate, or no, health insurance in the United States. That’s one of the prices of capitalism.
 

Dr. Acula

ACCEPT JESUS
Supporter
Joined
Jul 26, 2012
Messages
25,056
Reputation
8,355
Daps
132,308

THE MACHINE

night owl
Joined
May 27, 2012
Messages
26,877
Reputation
6,510
Daps
104,303
Reppin
P.G. County
An Independent Progressive with a Corporate Democrat aka Hillary Clinton 2.0? :pachaha:

That ticket locks up all non GOP voters. And more importantly, it is a really good ticket

Nobody else even has a plan worth mentioning :mjlol: Dems are spinning their wheels and hoping for an impeachment. Not gaining any traction besides tweeting. He'll be there in 2020 and there still won't be a face for the Democratic Party. Dems and indies can't mess this up again can they? Non voting Dems and indies in Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin owe this country an apology every day until election 2020
 

GnauzBookOfRhymes

Superstar
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
12,353
Reputation
2,812
Daps
47,564
Reppin
NULL
I knew at some point nap would cite Ms. Rampell at some point. Member of the exalted class who probably doesn't know the difference between a premium and deductible; proud defender of legacy admissions and princess of the meaningless drivel society.

This is going as well as can be expected. Losers on the sideline screaming at no one in particular. Meanwhile you'lol probably find a significant percentage of Trump voters be behind this within the next year or so.
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
Bushed
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
302,087
Reputation
-34,036
Daps
611,644
Reppin
The Deep State
:mjpls:



Did Democrats jump the gun with single-payer splash?

Did Democrats jump the gun with single-payer splash?

There's second-guessing inside the party about Bernie Sanders' timing as Republicans take aim again at Obamacare.

ELANA SCHOR 09/19/2017 07:02 PM EDT

Last week, a group of Senate Democrats rallied behind single-payer health care at a splashy news conference. This week, the same group is scrambling to beat back the GOP's latest Obamacare repeal blitz.

The contrast shows the chasm between the two parties’ approach to health care: Republicans claim that Bernie Sanders’ “Medicare for All” pitch fueled their revived repeal effort, an argument that even Democratic single-payer foes dismiss as untrue. Yet some Democrats wish more attention had been paid to protecting the Affordable Care Act before some of the party's biggest names turned to single payer
.

It's also a reminder that in Washington you can never underestimate the power of a president, even if they don't always win. President Donald Trump wanted one last shot at repealing Obamacare, and Democrats are now struggling to preserve a victory they thought they'd already secured.

“I thought that anyone who believed that you should take your eye off the ball before Sept. 30 wasn’t being smart,” said Sen. Heidi Heitkamp (D-N.D.), who does not support single-payer. “So it doesn’t surprise me that this is coming back.”


Sen. Tom Carper (D-Del.) acknowledged that “maybe” the single-payer rollout had been premature, recalling a Methodist minister who once advised him as governor that “the main thing is to keep the main thing the main thing.”

“In this case the main thing is stabilizing the [Obamacare] exchanges, so people in every state, every county, can have better health insurance at a better cost,” said Carper, who has not signed on to Sanders’ bill. “That’s what we should be about right now.”

Sanders' single-payer plan drew support from no fewer than five fellow potential challengers to Trump in 2020. Liberal activists crowed that any Democrat who wants the party's next presidential nod would have to support a path to universal health care.

The same cast of liberal luminaries, including Sens. Kamala Harris (D-Calif.), Cory Booker (D-N.J.) and Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), is now turning to stoking grass-roots fury about the new Republican repeal plan.

Senate Minority Whip dikk Durbin (D-Ill.), the minority whip, said it “remains to be seen” whether Democrats shifted too quickly to debating single-payer even as Obamacare repeal was still lurking.

Sens. Bill Cassidy (R-La.) and Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) were crafting their latest version of a repeal measure “even as Bernie was working on his press conference” on single payer, Durbin added, "so it’s been around a while.”

Though no Democratic senator faulted single payer’s supporters, some in the party lamented the choice to unveil single payer before the GOP reached its deadline to repeal Obamacare with a simple majority vote. Trump and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) are working hard to lock down Republican support for repeal, and they're close. A climactic vote could come next week, as the clock runs out on any hope of getting rid of Obamacare.

“Doing it when he did it was a gift to the repealers,” one Democratic strategist said of Sanders’ single-payer push. “It took focus off them and put it on us at an unhelpful time.”


One Senate Democratic aide wondered whether the single-payer splash could have waited until next month, when the GOP's window to repeal Obamacare with 50 votes will have closed.

“It’s the timing that’s the problem,” the aide said. “If this was introduced Oct. 1, that’d be one thing, but this is almost perfectly timed to make it harder to defend the ACA.”

“We should be trying to save the most progressive health care overhaul in decades, because it’s really at risk. But instead, they’re riling up the base over single payer, making the perfect the enemy of the good at the worst possible moment,” the person added.

A liberal activist whose group supports single-payer health care sounded a similar note, saying that the timing of Sanders’ rollout had handed “Republicans a lot of space” to quietly twist arms on the Cassidy-Graham repeal plan.


If the GOP can push through that repeal legislation, which would scrap Obamacare’s individual mandate and slash its Medicaid expansion, second-guessing about single payer promises to grow louder. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) and House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) did not endorse Sanders’ health care plan, but their short-term government funding and debt limit deal with Trump earlier this month also helped clear space for Senate Republicans' new repeal effort.

Sanders, for his part, joined Schumer at a Tuesday rally of progressive activists against the new repeal bill. The 2016 presidential candidate also recorded a video slamming the Cassidy-Graham plan to be circulated on his social media platforms. Sanders is likely to participate in more pro-Obamacare events over the next 10 days and considers the defeat of repeal his No. 1 priority right now, an aide said.

“Our job over the next five to 10 days is to get the word out about this horrific legislation and do everything we can to defeat it,” Sanders tweeted on Tuesday.

Sen. Brian Schatz (D-Hawaii), a single-payer supporter, agreed that the party should wait to talk further about its vision for the future of health care until after the latest Republican repeal effort is defeated.

“Let me put it this way: We need all hands on deck to try to save the Affordable Care Act, and there will be a time when this is over to talk about our own proposals to improve the health care system,” Schatz said in an interview. “But right now they are trying to destroy the American health care system, and we have to stop them.”


Sen. Jon Tester (D-Mont.), who has not signed on to single-payer, said that “whether it’s a distraction or not, I think the focus really does need to be on the smoke and mirrors they’re trying to do with this bill.” Tester slammed the Cassidy-Graham plan as “the worst” version of Obamacare repeal that Republicans have offered.

Democrats continued their campaign against the Cassidy-Graham measure on Tuesday, with the pro-Obamacare group Save my Care launching a six-figure TV ad buy targeting moderate Republican senators. Meanwhile, Pelosi is rallying her caucus from afar.

"This is an all-out red alert," she told members of her leadership team.

John Bresnahan and Heather Caygle contributed to this report.

POLITICO Playbook and get the latest news, every morning — in your inbox.

Show Comments
 

FAH1223

Go Wizards, Go Terps, Go Packers!
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
May 16, 2012
Messages
68,535
Reputation
8,017
Daps
207,825
Reppin
WASHINGTON, DC
:mjpls:



Did Democrats jump the gun with single-payer splash?

Did Democrats jump the gun with single-payer splash?

There's second-guessing inside the party about Bernie Sanders' timing as Republicans take aim again at Obamacare.

ELANA SCHOR 09/19/2017 07:02 PM EDT

Last week, a group of Senate Democrats rallied behind single-payer health care at a splashy news conference. This week, the same group is scrambling to beat back the GOP's latest Obamacare repeal blitz.

The contrast shows the chasm between the two parties’ approach to health care: Republicans claim that Bernie Sanders’ “Medicare for All” pitch fueled their revived repeal effort, an argument that even Democratic single-payer foes dismiss as untrue. Yet some Democrats wish more attention had been paid to protecting the Affordable Care Act before some of the party's biggest names turned to single payer
.

It's also a reminder that in Washington you can never underestimate the power of a president, even if they don't always win. President Donald Trump wanted one last shot at repealing Obamacare, and Democrats are now struggling to preserve a victory they thought they'd already secured.

“I thought that anyone who believed that you should take your eye off the ball before Sept. 30 wasn’t being smart,” said Sen. Heidi Heitkamp (D-N.D.), who does not support single-payer. “So it doesn’t surprise me that this is coming back.”


Sen. Tom Carper (D-Del.) acknowledged that “maybe” the single-payer rollout had been premature, recalling a Methodist minister who once advised him as governor that “the main thing is to keep the main thing the main thing.”

“In this case the main thing is stabilizing the [Obamacare] exchanges, so people in every state, every county, can have better health insurance at a better cost,” said Carper, who has not signed on to Sanders’ bill. “That’s what we should be about right now.”

Sanders' single-payer plan drew support from no fewer than five fellow potential challengers to Trump in 2020. Liberal activists crowed that any Democrat who wants the party's next presidential nod would have to support a path to universal health care.

The same cast of liberal luminaries, including Sens. Kamala Harris (D-Calif.), Cory Booker (D-N.J.) and Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), is now turning to stoking grass-roots fury about the new Republican repeal plan.

Senate Minority Whip dikk Durbin (D-Ill.), the minority whip, said it “remains to be seen” whether Democrats shifted too quickly to debating single-payer even as Obamacare repeal was still lurking.

Sens. Bill Cassidy (R-La.) and Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) were crafting their latest version of a repeal measure “even as Bernie was working on his press conference” on single payer, Durbin added, "so it’s been around a while.”

Though no Democratic senator faulted single payer’s supporters, some in the party lamented the choice to unveil single payer before the GOP reached its deadline to repeal Obamacare with a simple majority vote. Trump and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) are working hard to lock down Republican support for repeal, and they're close. A climactic vote could come next week, as the clock runs out on any hope of getting rid of Obamacare.

“Doing it when he did it was a gift to the repealers,” one Democratic strategist said of Sanders’ single-payer push. “It took focus off them and put it on us at an unhelpful time.”


One Senate Democratic aide wondered whether the single-payer splash could have waited until next month, when the GOP's window to repeal Obamacare with 50 votes will have closed.

“It’s the timing that’s the problem,” the aide said. “If this was introduced Oct. 1, that’d be one thing, but this is almost perfectly timed to make it harder to defend the ACA.”

“We should be trying to save the most progressive health care overhaul in decades, because it’s really at risk. But instead, they’re riling up the base over single payer, making the perfect the enemy of the good at the worst possible moment,” the person added.

A liberal activist whose group supports single-payer health care sounded a similar note, saying that the timing of Sanders’ rollout had handed “Republicans a lot of space” to quietly twist arms on the Cassidy-Graham repeal plan.


If the GOP can push through that repeal legislation, which would scrap Obamacare’s individual mandate and slash its Medicaid expansion, second-guessing about single payer promises to grow louder. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) and House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) did not endorse Sanders’ health care plan, but their short-term government funding and debt limit deal with Trump earlier this month also helped clear space for Senate Republicans' new repeal effort.

Sanders, for his part, joined Schumer at a Tuesday rally of progressive activists against the new repeal bill. The 2016 presidential candidate also recorded a video slamming the Cassidy-Graham plan to be circulated on his social media platforms. Sanders is likely to participate in more pro-Obamacare events over the next 10 days and considers the defeat of repeal his No. 1 priority right now, an aide said.

“Our job over the next five to 10 days is to get the word out about this horrific legislation and do everything we can to defeat it,” Sanders tweeted on Tuesday.

Sen. Brian Schatz (D-Hawaii), a single-payer supporter, agreed that the party should wait to talk further about its vision for the future of health care until after the latest Republican repeal effort is defeated.

“Let me put it this way: We need all hands on deck to try to save the Affordable Care Act, and there will be a time when this is over to talk about our own proposals to improve the health care system,” Schatz said in an interview. “But right now they are trying to destroy the American health care system, and we have to stop them.”


Sen. Jon Tester (D-Mont.), who has not signed on to single-payer, said that “whether it’s a distraction or not, I think the focus really does need to be on the smoke and mirrors they’re trying to do with this bill.” Tester slammed the Cassidy-Graham plan as “the worst” version of Obamacare repeal that Republicans have offered.

Democrats continued their campaign against the Cassidy-Graham measure on Tuesday, with the pro-Obamacare group Save my Care launching a six-figure TV ad buy targeting moderate Republican senators. Meanwhile, Pelosi is rallying her caucus from afar.

"This is an all-out red alert," she told members of her leadership team.

John Bresnahan and Heather Caygle contributed to this report.

POLITICO Playbook and get the latest news, every morning — in your inbox.

Show Comments


Nice try. Graham Cassidy was in the works before last week.
 
Top