That's my point, 10 years from now Dems will be much more competitive in the South, only then should they be spending millions to flip it. Until then, they should be allocating their resources to securing the Midwest.
Besides Virgina and NC, Dems should give up trying to win statewide elections in South
- Thread starter GodinDaFlesh
- Start date
That's my point, 10 years from now Dems will be much more competitive in the South, only then should they be spending millions to flip it. Until then, they should be allocating their resources to securing the Midwest.
Yo, a progressive Black man lost by 1%, plus now a million more people just got the right to vote who didn't have it for this election, and you gonna give up on Florida?
A progressive Black woman is down by 2%, despite her opponent employing massive voter suppression tactics, and you gonna give up on Georgia?
A progressive Dem is down by 2%, in a state where demographics have been crashing in the Democrats' favor and will continue to do so, and you gonna give up on Texas?
This is some dumb talk right here.
A progressive Black woman is down by 2%, despite her opponent employing massive voter suppression tactics, and you gonna give up on Georgia?
A progressive Dem is down by 2%, in a state where demographics have been crashing in the Democrats' favor and will continue to do so, and you gonna give up on Texas?
This is some dumb talk right here.
And so was the governor of California just 7 years ago. He got both dead wrong.
Be proud about losing brehs. And those Republicans in blue states are anomalies and basically just Republican in name only.Yo, a progressive Black man lost by 1%, plus now a million more people just got the right to vote who didn't have it for this election, and you gonna give up on Florida?
A progressive Black woman is down by 2%, despite her opponent employing massive voter suppression tactics, and you gonna give up on Georgia?
A progressive Dem is down by 2%, in a state where demographics have been crashing in the Democrats' favor and will continue to do so, and you gonna give up on Texas?
This is some dumb talk right here.
And so was the governor of California just 7 years ago. He got both dead wrong.
newworldafro
DeeperThanRapBiggerThanHH
Gillums and Abrams only lost by a couple 10s of thousands. These were no overwhelming victories.
Yeah, because ceding the Midwest to Republicans worked so welll
Where did I say anything about ceding the Midwest to Republicans? I basically was agreeing with you. Reading comprehension man...
Dems lost the midwest with the same strategy you're talking about. Kansas used to be a blue state. All these states were because you had the rust bowl up north and farmers on goverment subsidies everywhere else
One of these elections, Texas and Georgia will magically turn blue unexpectedly.....and the apocalypse of the Repiblican party will be at hand
Rocket Scientist
Superstar
Aight tru but Bruh midwest usually red right?.Crazy part is every race we won since 1964 depends on only Ohio.Bro every state doesn't matter.We can beat Trump and win back the Senate without the Deep South. We just need the Midwest and the rest of the reliable blue states.
Uncle Phil 36
All Star
Stupid thread. Lose by less than 3 points in FLA and TX and brehs want to fold up shop
You dummies still insisting we try to win in these states that barely elect Dems when all we have to do is win Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania to win back the White House. And we wonder why the GOP rules this country.
Probably not I doubt the turnout for dems will be this high when trump is out of office