Best documentary about Egypt plus confirmation about black Egyptians

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

Dude give it up. Black people built the pyramids.

Egypt had more than a few ethnic groups due to location and none of them were Black.

Thinking otherwise is anachronistic and historically false....... unless you're a racist.​

 

[SlimeyLilDude]

Egypt had more than a few ethnic groups due to location and none of them were Black.

Thinking otherwise is anachronistic and historically false....... unless you're a racist.​

Why did they cut off all of the noses? And it don't matter how many ethnic groups were in Egypt. The people that built the pyramids were black people.

Just answer this one question for me. When white people claim that white people or Europeans built the pyramids they are lying right? Yes or no?

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

Why did they cut off all of the noses?

Egyptian rulers did that to other, past rulers as a form of disrespect. Also, there were many revolts by citizens, not to mention invasions, that also vandalized them.​

And it don't matter how many ethnic groups were in Egypt. The people that built the pyramids were black people.

Black people didn't exist until the 16th Century CE. Egyptians, due to trade, were multi-ethnic with a Levantine/North African majority that varied upon location. Further south, more Nubian.......just like now.​

Just answer this one question for me. When white people claim that white people or Europeans built the pyramids they are lying right?

I don't listen to people spouting such nonsense.​

 

[Premeditated]

just finished it

damn, I was really with them until they started talking about the Americas and Olmecs

documentary should have stopped at the 2 hour and 20 minute mark

kind of makes me question the credibility of the whole thing.

 

[Premeditated]

but forreal though, I'm mad I wasted two and the half hours on this documentary because they just had to go overboard with some theories. like them crossing the Atlantic Ocean, when we know damn well, that nobody at that time could make vessels that could withstand the currents from the ocean.

I'll always say, the best way to know a countries demographics is to see how the army looked like

I've yet to see a white or asiatic version of these models. mind you these models date back as far as 2500 bc

even in the hierographic of Ramses II striking at the pitch black nubians, you can see that Ramses' army themselves looked like lightskin nubians, just like the nubians you see today. Those pitch black "nubians" him and his army were attacking were clearly Nilotic. they even have the same side profile as Nilotics today.

these Egyptologist need to go ahead and test and release the genetic profile of the mummies of the first dynastic. fukk they waiting for?

 

[alpo]

Egypt had more than a few ethnic groups due to location and none of them were Black.

Thinking otherwise is anachronistic and historically false....... unless you're a racist.​

 

[Premeditated]

remember, he thinks africans are not black.

he's said it countless times

 

[alpo]

remember, he thinks africans are not black.

he's said it countless times

i mean i get what hes saying but breh be confusing as hell. then he be posting that 1995 aol info thats been debunked

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

these Egyptologist need to go ahead and test and release the genetic profile of the mummies of the first dynastic. fukk they waiting for?

There aren't any or their DNA has deteriorated too much to test. The closest you'll get is this....

Ancient Egyptian mummy genomes suggest an increase of Sub-Saharan African ancestry in post-Roman periods | Nature Communications​

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

i mean i get what hes saying but breh be confusing as hell. then he be posting that 1995 aol info thats been debunked

Nothing I posted was debunked and to allay your confusion, consider this: Did Black people sell Black people into slavery?​

 

[Premeditated]

There aren't any or their DNA has deteriorated too much to test. The closest you'll get is this....

Ancient Egyptian mummy genomes suggest an increase of Sub-Saharan African ancestry in post-Roman periods | Nature Communications​

yeah, seen this along time ago......and that' still doesn't prove anything.

However, we note that all our genetic data were obtained from a single site in Middle Egypt and may not be representative for all of ancient Egypt. It is possible that populations in the south of Egypt were more closely related to those of Nubia and had a higher sub-Saharan genetic component, in which case the argument for an influx of sub-Saharan ancestries after the Roman Period might only be partially valid and have to be nuanced

these mummies are also from the New Kingdom to Roman Period
before the new kingdom, there was the predynastic, Early dynasty, old kingdom, first intermediate period, middle kingdom and second intermediate period. that is almost a good 2,500 years before the new kingdom.
plus they only tested 90 mummies

 

[Asante]

There aren't any or their DNA has deteriorated too much to test. The closest you'll get is this....

Ancient Egyptian mummy genomes suggest an increase of Sub-Saharan African ancestry in post-Roman periods | Nature Communications​

Why the fukk do you keep lying? Do I need to humiliate you AGAIN? Remember when you said that sickle cell (a Niger Congo specific adaptation) was a disease that RANDOMLY occurs in the Tropics, and I provided a new study proving that it was NOT random, but originated in the Sudan around 5,000 BC? Which is therefore proof of African affinity wherever it is found (including in predynastic Khametic mummies.

There have been LESS THAN A DOZEN mummies tested out of THOUSANDS of samples. There is no possible fukking way to make ANY CONCLUSION on this matter based on such a premature undeveloped science and a COMPLETE lack of FULL genome wide genetic comparisons.

And you keep trying to misinform people by continuously posting a lying DEBUNKED you POS.

“Results that are likely reliable are from studies that analyzed short tandem repeats (STRs) from Amarna royal mummies5 (1,300 BC), and of Ramesses III (1,200 BC)6; Ramesses III had the Y chromosome haplogroup E1b1a, an old African lineage7. Our analysis of STRs from Amarna and Ramesside royal mummies with popAffiliator18 based on the same published data5,6 indicates a 41.7% to 93.9% probability of SSA affinities (see Table 1); most of the individuals had a greater probability of affiliation with “SSA” which is not the only way to be “African”- a point worth repeating.”

FROM: -Gourdine JP, Keita SOY, Gourdine JL, Anselin A, 2018. Ancient Egyptian Genomes from northern Egypt

 

[Asante]

yeah, seen this along time ago......and that' still doesn't prove anything.


these mummies are also from the New Kingdom to Roman Period
before the new kingdom, there was the predynastic, Early dynasty, old kingdom, first intermediate period, middle kingdom and second intermediate period. that is almost a good 2,500 years before the new kingdom.
plus they only tested 90 mummies

No. They were only again to get aDNA from THREE MUMMIES out of the 90. Repeat they could ONLY TEST THREE MUMMIES. All three of these mummies were from LATE PERIOD in KNOWN NORTHERN FOREIGN GRAVES. So the Cacs who conducted study and sensationalized the title did so with insidious intention of misleading the public ad Egyptologist Stewart Scott broke down in his lecture. Scott damn near said that these people were in fact clearly doing some political stunt in order to be so damn ignorant of Khametic population history.

 

[RedCloakBlackWraithe]

just found another to add to the ignore list...

 

[RedCloakBlackWraithe]

finished the doc. thoro, on point. perfect math...