Best Duos in NBA History: NBATV Brackets

GreatestLaker

#FirePelinka
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
22,171
Reputation
1,035
Daps
44,276
Kobe and Shaq.

Jordan and MJ won more, but they were in their primes when they played together. We never got to see prime Kobe and prime Shaq together. Kobe was only 25 when the Shaq/Kobe duo broke up and by that time Shaq was already out of his.
 

kingofnyc

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
28,396
Reputation
1,615
Daps
58,373
Reppin
Boogie Down BX
Winner: Im taking Shaq/Kobe


Shaq and Kobe is the greatest inside/outside duo of all-time:blessed:
shaq and Kobe should run away with this
Kobe and Shaq.

Jordan and MJ won more, but they were in their primes when they played together. We never got to see prime Kobe and prime Shaq together. Kobe was only 25 when the Shaq/Kobe duo broke up and by that time Shaq was already out of his.
Shaq and Kobe goat duo


Michael+Jordan+Charlotte+Bobcats+v+Chicago+R9IFfzZhTy1l.jpg
 

FS4LFE

Veteran
Joined
Jul 18, 2014
Messages
14,477
Reputation
2,313
Daps
69,484
I said 2001 Shaq and Kobe was their best as a duo together or 2000 Shaq and 2003 Kobe was their best individual seasons while being together as a duo


Kobe's best individual year with Shaq was 2003, not 2000:ufdup:


Neither LeBron and Wade NOR Jordan and Pippen is beating Shaq and Kobe, because they couldnt stop Shaq without doubling and they couldnt sag off Kobe either because he was hitting almost 40% of his 3pters that year
Shaq is a center the other Bron Wade Pippen and MJ are wings. It's common sense as to why they couldn't guard him.
 

FS4LFE

Veteran
Joined
Jul 18, 2014
Messages
14,477
Reputation
2,313
Daps
69,484
Kobe and Shaq.

Jordan and MJ won more, but they were in their primes when they played together. We never got to see prime Kobe and prime Shaq together. Kobe was only 25 when the Shaq/Kobe duo broke up and by that time Shaq was already out of his.
What does that even mean? We got to see prime MJ and Pip together and they won more than Kobe and Shaq. So why would you take them over MJ/Pip.
 

Newzz

"The Truth" always prevails
Supporter
Joined
May 10, 2012
Messages
44,924
Reputation
7,480
Daps
104,643
What does that even mean? We got to see prime MJ and Pip together and they won more than Kobe and Shaq. So why would you take them over MJ/Pip.

Because Shaq and Kobe are the better duo:ufdup:


Cousy and Russell won just as much as Jordan and Pippen, does that mean they are "better" than Shaq/Kobe also by the same faulty criteria you're using?:mjpls:


2001 Shaq and Kobe is the greatest tandem in NBA history. No version of Jordan/Pippen compares, because Shaq and Kobe were basically the whole Lakers squad. Jordan/Pippen NEEDED Horace Grant and Dennis Rodman to make their cypher complete.


That would be like talking about the 2011-2014 Heat duo of LeBron/Wade but leaving out Chris Bosh. Grant was needed.
 

GreatestLaker

#FirePelinka
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
22,171
Reputation
1,035
Daps
44,276
What does that even mean? We got to see prime MJ and Pip together and they won more than Kobe and Shaq. So why would you take them over MJ/Pip.
Pippen and Jordan played their entire primes together. Kobe wasn't in his prime while Shaq was a Laker. If you pair a 21 year old Shaq with a 21 year old Kobe they win just as many rings as MJ/Pippen if not more.
 

FS4LFE

Veteran
Joined
Jul 18, 2014
Messages
14,477
Reputation
2,313
Daps
69,484
Because Shaq and Kobe are the better duo:ufdup:


Cousy and Russell won just as much as Jordan and Pippen, does that mean they are "better" than Shaq/Kobe also by the same faulty criteria you're using?:mjpls:



2001 Shaq and Kobe is the greatest tandem in NBA history.
No it's cause Shaq is 7'0'' Center and the other players are wings.
If they were better they would have won more rings than MJ/Pip
 

FS4LFE

Veteran
Joined
Jul 18, 2014
Messages
14,477
Reputation
2,313
Daps
69,484
Pippen and Jordan played their entire primes together. Kobe wasn't in his prime while Shaq was a Laker. If you pair a 21 year old Shaq with a 21 year old Kobe they win just as many rings as MJ/Pippen if not more.
This isn't based on Coulda woulda shoulda's it's based on things that actually happened.
 

Newzz

"The Truth" always prevails
Supporter
Joined
May 10, 2012
Messages
44,924
Reputation
7,480
Daps
104,643
No it's cause Shaq is 7'0'' Center and the other players are wings.

:what:?


So Im gonna punish the Shaq/Kobe duo because Shaq was 7'0?:dahell:?


That's the whole point of them being the greatest duo....elite post play as well as elite perimeter play. They were hard to cover which is why the 2001 Lakers were the team that went 16-1 in the NBA playoffs, something not even the 72-10 Bulls could accomplish:ufdup:


Kobe and Shaq were the best duo.


If they were better they would have won more rings than MJ/Pip

:camby:


Tony Parker and Tim Duncan have won more titles than Bird/McHale AND Shaq/Kobe duos have....I guess they are better as well right:comeon:


The logic:snoop:
 

GreatestLaker

#FirePelinka
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
22,171
Reputation
1,035
Daps
44,276
Jordan and Pippen had a much better supporting cast. No one on those Shaq/Kobe's teams were as good as Rodman, Grant or Toni Kukoc. Not even close.
 

Jplaya2023

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
43,986
Reputation
-492
Daps
91,673
Because Shaq and Kobe are the better duo:ufdup:


Cousy and Russell won just as much as Jordan and Pippen, does that mean they are "better" than Shaq/Kobe also by the same faulty criteria you're using?:mjpls:


2001 Shaq and Kobe is the greatest tandem in NBA history. No version of Jordan/Pippen compares, because Shaq and Kobe were basically the whole Lakers squad. Jordan/Pippen NEEDED Horace Grant and Dennis Rodman to make their cypher complete.


That would be like talking about the 2011-2014 Heat duo of LeBron/Wade but leaving out Chris Bosh. Grant was needed.

horace grant was awful in the 93 finals, had the bulls lost he would've been traded

I guarantee you a 21 year old magic and kareem win more than a 21 year old shaq and kobe simply because they got along and put winning first.
 
Top