Bestiality brothels are 'spreading through Germany'

[Benny P]

I think there is a big difference between a consulting of-age adult and an animal and/or child who cannot legally consent.

I think we tend to forget that marriage is a legal construct. Therefore all applicable legal rules apply.


That being said:






























to the notion of animal brothels.

 

[Blackking]

We're not talking about "modern history" in a generic sense. We're talking about the causal relationship between bestiality and homosexuality as legally protected or endorsed categories. And in that case, bestiality is not federally illegal in the US, and in fact, there are more states in which bestiality is legal in state law than there are states that allow gay marriage. That completely destroys the slippery slope argument, since bestiality was legal in the US (and in Germany) long before gay rights came into the picture. That's simple fact.

With issues like that, the law has always went nuts on animal fukkers.. Animal cruelty laws, sodomy, decency laws.... and about 34 UCMJ laws if you were in the military were used when there was not - do not fukk an animal law on the books.

These states have always punished it. Previous to that in Monarchies in Europe and African nations.. there were punishments for sick things like this. The reason a state like Florida is forced to put that Actual language on the books is because the sexual freedom boom and the # of cases has increased. You have lil kids walking in on family dogs being smanged, you have goat incidents increasing... because people are followers and if something is more common, people will/might go ahead and satify that secret desire. NTM the animal smashing groups and individuals are going hard because they see the legal language about freedom, rights, sexual freedom, and civil rights that the gay are currently manipulating and borrowing from Real and True civil rights issues. I recently read a thing by a dolphin lover stating “What is repulsive about a relationship where both partners feel and express love for each other? I know what I'm talking about here because after we made love, the dolphin put her snout on my shoulder, embraced me with her flippers and we stared into each others' eyes for about a minute.”

Ironically, language like that is legitimized through the gay movement- AKA the new Black Power Movement. Gays should have the right to be a couple. They've had rights to have sex and be in love. They had unions. if those unions weren't strong enough then the fight could have been to increase those.. No, if you really pay attention, not one Gay rights issues is about rights AT ALL- all of that shyt is about validation.

 

[Marvel]

Perversion is real friends...coming to a town near you

 

[KingDanz]

With issues like that, the law has always went nuts on animal fukkers.. Animal cruelty laws, sodomy, decency laws.... and about 34 UCMJ laws if you were in the military were used when there was not - do not fukk an animal law on the books.

These states have always punished it. Previous to that in Monarchies in Europe and African nations.. there were punishments for sick things like this. The reason a state like Florida is forced to put that Actual language on the books is because the sexual freedom boom and the # of cases has increased. You have lil kids walking in on family dogs being smanged, you have goat incidents increasing... because people are followers and if something is more common, people will/might go ahead and satify that secret desire. NTM the animal smashing groups and individuals are going hard because they see the legal language about freedom, rights, sexual freedom, and civil rights that the gay are currently manipulating and borrowing from Real and True civil rights issues. I recently read a thing by a dolphin lover stating “What is repulsive about a relationship where both partners feel and express love for each other? I know what I'm talking about here because after we made love, the dolphin put her snout on my shoulder, embraced me with her flippers and we stared into each others' eyes for about a minute.”

Ironically, language like that is legitimized through the gay movement- AKA the new Black Power Movement. Gays should have the right to be a couple. They've had rights to have sex and be in love. They had unions. if those unions weren't strong enough then the fight could have been to increase those.. No, if you really pay attention, not one Gay rights issues is about rights AT ALL- all of that shyt is about validation.

 

[MouseTeeth]

I think there is a big difference between a consulting of-age adult and an animal and/or child who cannot legally consent.

I think we tend to forget that marriage is a legal construct. Therefore all applicable legal rules apply.


That being said:



fukk out of here with rationality, sensibility and logic breh breh !!!! It's all the fakkits fault


























to the notion of animal brothels.

 

[Benny P]

 

[The Real]

With issues like that, the law has always went nuts on animal fukkers.. Animal cruelty laws, sodomy, decency laws.... and about 34 UCMJ laws if you were in the military were used when there was not - do not fukk an animal law on the books.

These states have always punished it. Previous to that in Monarchies in Europe and African nations.. there were punishments for sick things like this. The reason a state like Florida is forced to put that Actual language on the books is because the sexual freedom boom and the # of cases has increased. You have lil kids walking in on family dogs being smanged, you have goat incidents increasing... because people are followers and if something is more common, people will/might go ahead and satify that secret desire. NTM the animal smashing groups and individuals are going hard because they see the legal language about freedom, rights, sexual freedom, and civil rights that the gay are currently manipulating and borrowing from Real and True civil rights issues. I recently read a thing by a dolphin lover stating “What is repulsive about a relationship where both partners feel and express love for each other? I know what I'm talking about here because after we made love, the dolphin put her snout on my shoulder, embraced me with her flippers and we stared into each others' eyes for about a minute.”

Ironically, language like that is legitimized through the gay movement- AKA the new Black Power Movement. Gays should have the right to be a couple. They've had rights to have sex and be in love. They had unions. if those unions weren't strong enough then the fight could have been to increase those.. No, if you really pay attention, not one Gay rights issues is about rights AT ALL- all of that shyt is about validation.

Bruh, you're just repeating yourself without addressing anything I said. You still don't have a real argument.

And miss me with these bizarre, unsupported accounts of animal sex becoming more popular and anecdotes about dolphin lovers. Cite some real info, please.

 

[Bruce Wayne]

Disappointed as a Human. Beastiality is an all time low. I always Wondered what Pushes these Freaks to a 4 Legged Creature instead of a Woman.

Please don't Mistake that as being Curious.

 

[Blackking]

Bruh, you're just repeating yourself without addressing anything I said. You still don't have a real argument.

And miss me with these bizarre, unsupported accounts of animal sex becoming more popular and anecdotes about dolphin lovers. Cite some real info, please.

Since you can't say I'm incorrect I'll carry on.

And the stuff I said about the military in this issue is very real info. I'm not about to research animal sex sites to prove anything to you... you know what I'm saying is true even if it makes you uncomfortable or doesn't agree with your pov.

Zoophilia and polygamy are both illegal while being gay is not. All the things related to animal sex have their own push to be legal. Most of the anti-zoosexual states in American have only made those specific laws since 99. The push for actual laws in all 50 states is due to sexual freedom movements and these people using the gay causes as justification. Get real @The Real

There are even legislators both New Zealand and Australia that have made comments about gay rights and animal sex.

LOL! at you on here so butthurt by the truth that you're trying to pretend that bestiality is accepted like homosexuality - or is more accepted and can't be the slippery slop for it. Even Gay beast lovers say that "being zoophile is like being gay in the 1950's.

2-8% of the pop has sexual feeling towards animals, 2-8 has same sex feelings and I'm not saying gay rights is warranting a push for this behavior- I'm saying that it's opening the door for those who call themselves "zoos" to piggyback off the gay movement - who falsely piggybacked off the black movements.

Now we have terms like Zoophilie homosexualite n shyt. Mabel Stark was the worlds best tiger training... she used to get Tiger Cum shots n shyt and had to ware white to conceal the cum.. lol, this shyt's real breh. The Danish Animal Ethics Council report states that sex can be a positive experience for both animals and humans in people/beast sex. The whole we are simply in love and all parties agree is the legal argument that they will tie into the language of gay rights cases. In Japan you sensor human mouth to human penis contact.. but animal porn is not censored.... so the world framework is there. The legal framework is currently being created with the transgender, man-man sex rights issues.... And in 10 years when this is all behind us, we will simply be used to the idea of animal sex.

Check out A.F. Neimoller is you're interested on laws present and past on the subject.

Check out reality if you want to fact check the shyt I just said about it.

 

[TallFrenchy]

Jesus Christ, bestiality brothels? That is just foul in so many ways.

Theres people who

for gay rights and the thought of a men with dookie fetishes but

at a sick cac who wants to smash ol betsy.

Buht buht theres no slippery slope. Disgusting!

That's not the same thing. At all.

1. Bestiality = having sex with animals of different species.
2. Non-human animals can't give consent

 

[The Real]

Zoophilia and polygamy are both illegal while being gay is not. All the things related to animal sex have their own push to be legal. Most of the anti-zoosexual states in American have only made those specific laws since 99. The push for actual laws in all 50 states is due to sexual freedom movements and these people using the gay causes as justification. Get real @The Real

Zoophilia is NOT illegal in the US. There is NO federal law banning it. There are only some state laws, which, again, are less numerous than states that currently have anti-sodomy laws AND more than the number of states that currently allow gay marriage. Those are facts. That's also why your focus on the military is dishonest- we're talking about national and state laws, not laws that only apply to the small subset of the population in the military.

The rest of your cherrypicking of random anecdotes from the military and around the world is unconvincing, since they're anecdotes, and you didn't even cite the one Danish report you mentioned, which would have been the only decent bit of evidence so far.

 

[Majestyx]

it's OK to smang animals.

 

[MouseTeeth]

fukk animals brehs

 

[Blackking]

Zoophilia is NOT illegal in the US. There is NO federal law banning it. There are only some state laws, which, again, are less numerous than states that currently have anti-sodomy laws AND more than the number of states that currently allow gay marriage. Those are facts. That's also why your focus on the military is dishonest- we're talking about national and state laws, not laws that only apply to the small subset of the population in the military.

The rest of your cherrypicking of random anecdotes from the military and around the world is unconvincing, since they're anecdotes, and you didn't even cite the one Danish report you mentioned, which would have been the only decent bit of evidence so far.

after this post, I wont post any more on this subject. It's worse to me when black people subscribe to and defend the demonic ways of cac.....

Anyway, Danish Animal Ethics Council report Udtalelse om menneskers seksuelle omgang med dyr published November 2006. Council members included two academics, two farmers/smallholders, and two veterinary surgeons, as well as a third veterinary surgeon acting as secretary.
Zoophilia - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
also research a lil...
Bodil Joensen - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

My focus on the military is legit, you can't deny it, so you say its dishonest when it's merely fact that you agree is fact.. I know deep down you see the parallels to civilian society and laws. After all, the don't ask don't tell was one of the first targets (and great victory) for the current gay rights causes.

LOL at around the world being anecdotes .. around the world is further along than the US w the beastiality except for Africa (which ironically, has a #waytoohardonhomos movement)

And speaking of dishonest.. I don't believe you're completely retarded. I don't believe that you think that Zoophilia not being in the constitution and on State Law books = it was ok and nonpunishable. Sodomy and animal cruelty laws are what judges and law enforcement used. The reason starting in 99 that the books and laws had to be changed in most states (obviously) is because due to legal loopholes and the current pushes for gay marriage and other right loopholes and manipulations the zoos decided to use the same piggyback style legal arguments-- combined with the belief that animals could consent in certain ways. Specifically in the UK and US animal rights issues were the legal issues raised for most of history. Now laws are on the books... and you are dishonest for even trying to hint at bussin inside animals was more acceptable than two men exercising love through swordsmanship.

 

[The Real]

after this post, I wont post any more on this subject. It's worse to me when black people subscribe to and defend the demonic ways of cac.....

What am I defending?

Anyway, Danish Animal Ethics Council report Udtalelse om menneskers seksuelle omgang med dyr published November 2006. Council members included two academics, two farmers/smallholders, and two veterinary surgeons, as well as a third veterinary surgeon acting as secretary.
Zoophilia - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
also research a lil...
Bodil Joensen - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Ok, thanks for some citation.

My focus on the military is legit, you can't deny it, so you say its dishonest when it's merely fact that you agree is fact.. I know deep down you see the parallels to civilian society and laws. After all, the don't ask don't tell was one of the first targets (and great victory) for the current gay rights causes.

It's dishonest because the laws of the military don't mirror the laws of the US at large. There's no point talking about what the military does or doesn't do when we could be talking about what the country as a whole and individual states do and don't do.

LOL at around the world being anecdotes .. around the world is further along than the US w the beastiality except for Africa (which ironically, has a #waytoohardonhomos movement)

This is another argument with no citation or support. Cherrypicking a few anecdotes and 1 or 2 cited comments doesn't really add up to evidence about the rest of the world.

And speaking of dishonest.. I don't believe you're completely retarded. I don't believe that you think that Zoophilia not being in the constitution and on State Law books = it was ok and nonpunishable. Sodomy and animal cruelty laws are what judges and law enforcement used. The reason starting in 99 that the books and laws had to be changed in most states (obviously) is because due to legal loopholes and the current pushes for gay marriage and other right loopholes and manipulations the zoos decided to use the same piggyback style legal arguments-- combined with the belief that animals could consent in certain ways. Specifically in the UK and US animal rights issues were the legal issues raised for most of history. Now laws are on the books... and you are dishonest for even trying to hint at bussin inside animals was more acceptable than two men exercising love through swordsmanship.

Why do you keep talking about it being ok? The point is that zoophilia was already nationally decriminalized before gay rights, that's all, so the argument that one is leading to the other is simply wrong. All the people who claim to be terrified about bestiality when they talk about it aren't actually fighting about the real fact that bestiality is not a crime in more states than sodomy is and where gay marriages are allowed. That's the point.

The bestiality discussion is a complete bad faith argument. There's no mass movement to make bestiality completely illegal, yet people claim that we should be scared of gay marriage opening the gates to it. That makes no sense. Either it's bad and people should be fighting against its legality now, or it's not a big problem and thus the gay rights argument is useless.