It's MY list

To me it's not always about the most dominant player but the player that is better over all and can be successful in various scenarios.
Shaq, despite his dominance was very limited in terms of overall skill set. He didnt have a lot of great moves but his footwork and agility were great. But it's his power that allowed him to dominate
Duncan, can beat you both with physical play and finesse. You want to dump it into him down low about 10 feet from the basket wih his back to the basket and let him back his man down? He got you. You wanna set him up for a soft J at the FT line. He got you. You wanna give it to him on the wing for a mid-range bank shot? He got you. You wanna feed it to him underneath the basket to overpower his man and either dunk it or hook it? He got you. Wanna Give it to him 20 feet from the basket and let him decide wether to hit a J or drive past his man? He got you.
Dont get me wrong I am not taking Shaq's dominance for granted. Hakeem nor Duncan can do what Shaq does. BUt in basketball my favorite players have (for the most part) always been the players that were most versatile. That can hurt you in many ways. David Robinson. Scottie Pippen. Jamal Mashburn. Chris Webber. Rasheed Wallace. Dirk Nowitzky. Arvydas Sabonis. Jordan. List goes on and on. That is just MY perception of basketball. I love the art of basketball. Not just the Ws and Ls and stats.