So they're all lying, how convenient.
As usual Cosby's dikkriders have no rational explanation for his innocence.
I think it's like that Law & Order SVU shyt...where neither side tells the full story.
Bill has been with Camile for like 60 years...every one knows he's married. My guess is that women were willing to do something with The Cos in a quid pro quo situation and didn't get the "pro quo" while Cos was all up in the quid.
They agreed to come to his hotel/crib...the intent to do SOMETHING...he drugs them and essentially rapes them but they would have fukked him anyway. He just wanted them asleep or inebriated. If a woman has every intention of having sex and then you drug her right before the panties drop...is it rape?
I think it is...kinda.....but a good lawyer can slice that up.
AFAIK...these weren't situations where he hunted them down. They mostly came to him. He was definitely offering more than dikk and probably only deliver dikk. If he helped them with their careers, casting couch shyt etc., I suspect a good chunk of the accusers would have kept silent.
Jennifer Lawrence got her big break so she didn't talk about Weinstein. Actresses that don't breakthrough have more reason to talk. It's similar to the Deshaun thing. Does evidence matter more...or the volume of accusations.