Barry and Hillarys wars are for corporations, what does that even mean? Corporations will always get rich off wars, just like many of FDRs friends and political allies did off of world war 2.
Stop with the semanitic tricks....That doesnt Negate my point...War invariably makes money for somebody..Some corporation makes money either way..
the question was national interests..FDR got into WW2 when it was clear the Axis powers wont stop at europe..it was in Americas interests to get ahead of them
Hillary and Barry KNEW Libya had nothing to do with terr0rism...and intervention was gonna be bloody,expensive and not beneficial for America ...but hey Boeing,KBR and Halliburton made some cash...
Do you have any links or anything I could look at? I assumed the primary reason was geopolitical stability, and a byproduct of that stability is money and security, same as any war ever fought outside of personal beefs. If you disagree with their methods, than that is subjective.
Please dont link me some off brand blog please, I dont have time to read counter punch
You need links to tell you theres more terr0rism now than before the invasion of libya and syria..really??
to tell you that the region is even more unstable than it was before...one would think the flow of millions of people abandoning their homes would be a good clue.
Johann Hari: We're not being told the truth on Libya
For the first time in more than 60 years, Western control over the world's biggest pots of oil was being rocked by a series of revolutions our governments couldn't control. The most plausible explanation is that this is a way of asserting raw Western power, and trying to arrange the fallout in our favour. But if you are still convinced our governments are acting for humanitarian reasons, I've got a round-trip plane ticket for you to some rubble in Pakistan and Congo. The people there would love to hear your argument.
worthy
