Yeah I'm pretty disappointed that it wasn't
Bill Russell is basically Harrison Barnes playing Center-Cowherd
- Thread starter Tony D'Amato
- Start date
Paradise50
Superstar
Did I say he wasn't talented? I've been following dude since his Davidson days here in NC
I just said he wouldn't be a superstar in the 90s era because the GAME was more physical. Just because the 90's allowed more physicality doesn't make it any less basketball then what we see today. Only time the nba swallow that whistle now is during the playoffs and if I'm not mistaken Curry didn't get the Finals MVP 
You still talking about shyt u don't know about
Son, you followed me to a good 3-4 threads after I hurt your feelings
feelosofer
#ninergang
If there is one thing you don't take seriously is on his basketball opinions.
Did I say he wasn't talented? I've been following dude since his Davidson days here in NC
But I don't get this physical stuff. Gave examples above in Miller & Porter who both thrived in the 90's with half the talent of Curry. Physicality didn't seem to bother them much
Curry may not have won Finals MVP, but he was dominant for that postseason as a whole averaging 28 ppg on great efficiency. He produced more in the playoffs than in the regular season and it was a preview for what was to come the following year in terms of three point volume. He doesn't really get many calls as is compared to contemporaries so that's not a reason he'd struggle. Applies more to someone like Harden or something
Paradise50
Superstar
lol @ reducing Reggie to just a shooter...he was an effective driver
Terry Porter? Superstar? Really?
First off, fukk Cowherd.
This is a hilarious comparison. I'm in tears.
This is a hilarious comparison. I'm in tears.
He said Bob Cousey couldnt make Mater Dei's varsity team.
How can people hate Colin?
if it wasn't for Bill Russell and Bob Cousy Mater Dei wouldn't have a varsity team 
lol @ reducing Reggie to just a shooter...he was an effective driver
Terry Porter? Superstar? Really?
No....I'm saying they were both stars in the era while being much less talented than Curry is today. & I'm a big fan of both their games.
So Reggie was an effective driver in the era of handchecking
Considering the fact that Curry is quicker, has elite handles and a better touch around the rim it only stands to reason that he would be considerably more effective at driving. The greatest off the bounce shooter in league history that can finish inside & make plays for others around him = superstar in any era.
Paradise50
Superstar
No....I'm saying they were both stars in the era while being much less talented than Curry is today. & I'm a big fan of both their games.
So Reggie was an effective driver in the era of handchecking
Considering the fact that Curry is quicker, has elite handles and a better touch around the rim it only stands to reason that he would be considerably more effective at driving. The greatest off the bounce shooter in league history that can finish inside & make plays for others around him = superstar in any era.
Reggie could and also Reggie wasn't a superstar either.
My whole argument is Curry wouldn't be a superstar in the 90s......you can keep concocting any narrative you want but that was my original opinion
Mark Price was an all star in 1989, 1992, 93, 94
Paradise50
Superstar
How'd he become a perrinial all star in such a rough and tough era?
So Curry wouldn't be able to do this in the 90s despite being a better finisher, scorer, ball-handler, shooter, and having way more range?
Mark Price survived in the era of "physical basketball" but Curry won't be putting up much better stats?