Black female atheists...do you exist?

Poitier

My Words Law
Supporter
Joined
Jul 30, 2013
Messages
69,412
Reputation
15,494
Daps
246,429
It doesn't.

having a simulation would say nothing about the SPECULATION that you're within one, yourself.

Look at Hunger Games. Being in that dome, doesn't mean the humans outside that dome controlling the games are themselves in another dome.

Bad example. This is a multi-dimensional theory unlike your scenario. Outside the dome and inside isn't a replica of the inside.
 

Dooby

إن شاء الله
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
8,382
Reputation
-450
Daps
10,414
It doesn't.

It says its the word of god...so? Its circular reasoning.

break-the-cycle.jpg


Because its not my job to prove their argument for them.

Because proof isn't conditional.

Theism ultimately relies on faith claims.



I can't tell you what it'd take for me to take them seriously...thats on them.

If they realize they have a hard time doing so, then they should inquire as to why they've chosen to defend it in the first place.

Fair enough.
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
Bushed
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
337,890
Reputation
-34,994
Daps
641,371
Reppin
The Deep State
Bad example. This is a multi-dimensional theory unlike your scenario. Outside the dome and inside isn't a replica of the inside.

Still doesn't prove anything.

why can't you just accept this?

Are you trying to argue or educate me?

The fact that you could create a "simulation" (or some other specious vocabulary for some entity you've theorized) would not mean humans themselves live in such a thing.
 

Poitier

My Words Law
Supporter
Joined
Jul 30, 2013
Messages
69,412
Reputation
15,494
Daps
246,429
Still doesn't prove anything.

why can't you just accept this?

Are you trying to argue or educate me?

The fact that you could create a "simulation" (or some other specious vocabulary for some entity you've theorized) would not mean humans themselves live in such a thing.

There is literally no reason I should give your word any credence
 

Dafunkdoc_Unlimited

Theological Noncognitivist Since Birth
Joined
Jul 25, 2012
Messages
45,062
Reputation
8,025
Daps
122,420
Reppin
The Wrong Side of the Tracks
Detroit Wave said:
im certain because there is 0 evidence showing he is real.

This is false.

1. Everything that begins to exist has a cause.
2. The Universe began to exist.
3. The Universe has a cause.​

semtex said:
Prove that unicorns aren't real.

Prove that Cthulhu isn't real.

Prove that batman isn't in San Francisco fighting crime right now.

Unicorns exist and have been photographed.

http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2008/06/unicorns-are-re/

unicorndeer_2.jpg


Cthulu was a fictional character created by H. P. Lovecraft in 1928.

Batman was a fictional character created by Bob Kane in 1939.

Theological Noncognitivism >>>>>> Atheism.​
 

Poitier

My Words Law
Supporter
Joined
Jul 30, 2013
Messages
69,412
Reputation
15,494
Daps
246,429
You don't need to.

You need to ask why what you're saying makes no sense.

CREATING A PERFECT 1:1 simulation would not prove humans existed in the same realm or are the product of such a thing.

nikka you sound hurt. You've literally failed to support your argument without any of the necessary math or any form of proof, so unlike you to do so, because you don't have anything outside of hopeless optimism that it isn't true :russ:
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
Bushed
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
337,890
Reputation
-34,994
Daps
641,371
Reppin
The Deep State
This is false.

1. Everything that begins to exist has a cause.​


False.

Prove this.


2. The Universe began to exist.
3. The Universe has a cause.
3. is unsubstantiated. and needs to be proven.

You can do better than William Lane Craig level of apologetics.

That shyt won't fly to the trained eye.


Unicorns exist and have been photographed.

http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2008/06/unicorns-are-re/

unicorndeer_2.jpg


Cthulu was a fictional character created by H. P. Lovecraft in 1928.

Batman was a fictional character created by Bob Kane in 1939.

Whats your point here?
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
Bushed
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
337,890
Reputation
-34,994
Daps
641,371
Reppin
The Deep State
nikka you sound hurt. You've literally failed to support your argument without any of the necessary math or any form of proof, so unlike you because you don't have anything outside of hopeless optimism that it isn't true :russ:

Do you even understand what the math they're using asserts?

They haven even finalized the STANDARD MODEL yet, and you're taking SPECULATIVE PAPERS as gospel (which when you read them are on the level of philosophy merely) about the POTENTIAL to do such a ything.

I don't rely on optimism. I rely on results.
 
Top