It's worth noting that most of their countries didn't existed at that time. Most of the Caribbean got its independence in the mid-1900sWhy not just ask the Caribbean country your family is from for Reparations?
It's worth noting that most of their countries didn't existed at that time. Most of the Caribbean got its independence in the mid-1900s
Also from what she's describing, she seems to be asking the wrong person. Her claim is independent of FBA/ados claims, but can still be filed domestically.She seems to be describing a civil complaint with the banking apparatuses of New York from the 1800s. These entities still exist , and they did indeed finance a bunch of the plantations in the Caribbean. JP Morgan Sr's bank and Citi were involved heavy. But I don't think it's correct for her to ask a US government entity directly for reparations since these transactions occurred from independent corporations.
I think the only Caribbean nation that can ask a US government entity for direct reparations is...Haiti since the US govt has directly fcked them over purely because they were black. It's not indirect, like with the case of the New York Banks financing the slave trade. But its a case where US Marines in federal agents legit robbed Haitian govt vaults or instituted multiple coupe-de-tats . These aren't necessarily clams for slavery itself, but for institutional sabotage of the Haitian government.
I think it's important not to conflate different reparations claims because it weakens the entire argument.It would be wiser to focus on specific grievances such as chattel slavery, Jim Crow, redlining, foreign fckery independently . I'm reminded of how the southern Baptist coalition and the NAACP didn't target segregation as whole, but instead; strategically targeted The weakest elements of the law, until the whole thing collapsed
Yes, I didn't realize how recent they got independence. My mom was telling us stories about they had them singing all these "england will never be slaves" songs in school (Trinidad).It's worth noting that most of their countries didn't existed at that time. Most of the Caribbean got its independence in the mid-1900s
Also from what she's describing, she seems to be asking the wrong person. Her claim is independent of FBA/ados claims, but can still be filed domestically.She seems to be describing a civil complaint with the banking apparatuses of New York from the 1800s. These entities still exist , and they did indeed finance a bunch of the plantations in the Caribbean. JP Morgan Sr's bank and Citi were involved heavy. But I don't think it's correct for her to ask a US government entity directly for reparations since these transactions occurred from independent corporations.
I think the only Caribbean nation that can ask a US government entity for direct reparations is...Haiti since the US govt has directly fcked them over purely because they were black. It's not indirect, like with the case of the New York Banks financing the slave trade. But its a case where US Marines in federal agents legit robbed Haitian govt vaults or instituted multiple coupe-de-tats . These aren't necessarily clams for slavery itself, but for institutional sabotage of the Haitian government.
I think it's important not to conflate different reparations claims because it weakens the entire argument.It would be wiser to focus on specific grievances such as chattel slavery, Jim Crow, redlining, foreign fckery independently . I'm reminded of how the southern Baptist coalition and the NAACP didn't target segregation as whole, but instead; strategically targeted The weakest elements of the law, until the whole thing collapsed