I watched the video, there wasn't anything that specifically linked BLM to the ousters of those prosecutors other than Uyger mentioning them.
I'm not saying they didn't have a part in it, but I find that the very phrase 'Black Lives Matter' tends to be an umbrella term in the media for any Black organization that does work in the community. Looking up the subject now, I'm also seeing organizations like Black Youth Project 100 and We Charge Genocide mentioned as contributors.
As long as BLM is funded by white billionaire George Soros, we should watch them very closely with a degree of skepticism.
Many people were involved in carrying this out, I concur. But you misread why I take issue with Potier.
I titled the video with the "BLM" in it because the
original video contains the tag. The
original video is titled
Black Lives Matter Voters Oust Tamir Rice Prosecutors.
So the only thing I personally added to the title at all was the mention of the second prosecutor and a simplified synonym for the word oust.
The title features BLM. The journalist (a well respected one I might add) mentions BLM... Therefore Poiter's inference that I somehow skewd the title because of a support for the group was ridiculous. It would only have come from a person that didn't bother to watch the video in the first place.
I have no interest in the opinions of those sorts of stern contrarians that spout a stance without even listening to the actual source material.
And I especially have no tolerance for them disparaging me across a keyboard. So that is why he is on ignore.
There are people that make moves, then there are people that sit and do nothing except criticize moves made by others. He is of the second type. And its quite burdensome to continually have to scroll past. So no more.