Black male slaves had more privilege than the white women that owned them? See OP

[Neuromancer]

I mean, male privilege was definitely a thing back then regardless of social status, however it's disingenuous to compare the privilege of male slaves to white women. I understand the underlying comparison of womanhood to chattel, but that in itself dismisses a non-enslaved woman's own agency. And I say "non-enslaved" because what does that argument say about enslaved women? Are they saying there's no difference???

I posit that the fear of genetic annihilation white men have negates any male privilege black men would have had. Again they castrated black male slaves for a reason. There can be only one.

 

[Indiglow Meta (R$G)]

To be sure, my stance is that it's not a valid comparison, but the underlying argument is that women have just recently been franchised and empowered after a period of being subject to men (their owners). But if a person were to just think briefly about what's being compared then they'd dismiss the argument outright.

This isn't accurate at all, who are your people?

 

[kuts]

Ok:
p*ssy, shut the fukk up.

You ain't shyt, but an ignore.

 

[Neuromancer]

I still don't understand the underlying comparison. White womanhood under white male patriarchy in any context shouldn't be compared to black male misery under chattle slavery. There's no "Well, it was sorta, kiiinda similar to actual chattel slavery" context to be had here. Chattle slavery is so evil and insidious, you can't make comparisons in any way, if it wasn't exactly that.

unless you are a white supremacist .

 

[Ski Mask]

This is why we need articles and studies that combat the black male privilge b.s. cause even tho it should be obvious that it is an oxymoron, people are actually getting tricked into believing it.

 

[Indiglow Meta (R$G)]

You ain't shyt, but an ignore.

Oh?
You are p*ssy, shut the fukk up, and shut the fukk up some more with your inane intellectual rumination, impotent desk BOY. bytch.

 

[Caprisun]

Black men in America ain't ready for whats in store for us in the 2020s .

about to be in for a huge wakeup call and they still don't get it.

 

[kuts]

I posit that the fear of genetic annihilation white men have negates any male privilege black men would have had. Again they castrated black male slaves for a reason. There can be only one.

I never said that I agreed with the comparison, in fact, I consider it invalid...

I thought that came across in my initial post...guess not...

 

[Neuromancer]

To be sure, my stance is that it's not a valid comparison, but the underlying argument is that women have just recently been franchised and empowered after a period of being subject to men (their owners). But if a person were to just think briefly about what's being compared then they'd dismiss the argument outright.

But That's not what's being discussed. You're bringing up a new point entirely. It's almost a covert deflection.

 

[invalid]

Slaves were not even consider human. They were property.

 

[Neuromancer]

I never said that I agreed with the comparison, in fact, I consider it invalid...

I thought that came across in my initial post...guess not...

It clearly didn't based on the people besides myself that replied. Again you made a statement that has nothing to do with what is being discussed. Was that an attempt to absolve white women?

 

[Neuromancer]

Slaves were not even consider human. They were property.

Yes. But yet people are making concessions for white women who were considered human in this very thread.

 

[Indiglow Meta (R$G)]

Got (must be a boatie/homo/suburbreh) desk jockey geniuses trying to do the "headway analysis" dance, like this bullshyt propaganda hasn't been in overdrive.
"Well, according to the intersectional platform, a man is just bad, so she's right in a nutshell."
maybe we should discover the nuances and open up a dialog!



p*ssy, shut the fukk up.
@Emeritus now you see why we disagree on robbery. bytch nikkas need robbery and assault, not "thecoli".

 

[kuts]

It clearly didn't based on the people besides myself that replied. Again you made a statement that has nothing to do with what is being discussed.

My statement was regarding how someone could even think slaves and non-slaves could be compared in general. Because to go even further and say that slaves, in fact, had more privilege is just ludicrous.

 

[Kenny West]

Now you know why feminists hate black men so much.

They hate having their petty victim narratives undermined by the historical atrocities of racism. Its en vouge to try to nudge these half ass "movements" into comparisons/synonyms for the civil rights movement people have died for and still do. The idea of them not being to play the ultimate victim is short circuiting their brains



"Gosh tryrone I wish you would get over that slavery crap it was soooo long ago. That was nothing compared to the opression I felt last week when chad said I looked fat in my dress."