Then how can they speak for us if we didn't ask them to?
I've never heard of this council I need to do more research.
Just think about the potential of directing finances and mass boycotting of businesses. We can ERASE certain groups from our community.
You do, just not in the way that you think. They are a coalition of black business owners that you patronize, black mayors and city councilman that you elected, black college presidents that we entrust with the education of our youth, black religious leaders that we’ve entrusted for our spiritual guidance, etc., that come together under the banner of “black advancement”. When I say “self-selected”, I mean that their council is replenished by them selecting others from among their ranks.
I see all these “ideas” from Coli posters about what we should be doing and the fact of the matter is almost all the ideas put forth, we have already been doing. I rarely see anything new.
The issue with a “committee” is that someone is bound to state that “such and such” does not represent them. As is the case with our current “council of noblemen”. However, we are to varied as a group to be able to appease everyone. I’m a fan of Toure. Most of the posters on here hate him with a passion. They don’t think he represents them and is dismissed as a c00n. On the flip side, TN and Umar Johnson are worshipped on this board, and I wouldn’t entertain them, along with the other “YouTube Scholars” with a ten foot pole. I think that they are all jokes. So instead of us looking at the big picture and starting at what Toure, TN, and Umar are all have in common, black advancement, we crystallize into our little factions that call Toure a c00n and TN and Umar frauds and we never get beyond that.
Our current system looks at who is the most educated, who is the most successful, who can best articulate, and that’s how our current leaders are chosen. That system is also flawed, because of the potential for self-interest and self-preservation, but it’s the best that we have at the moment.
This topics reminds me of the most recent mayoral race. Many black Chicago south and west side residents supported Willie Wilson for mayor because they saw him as a successful black entrepreneur that cared enough about the community to put his money where his mouth is. Professional black Chicagoans didn’t even consider him as a viable option because, although a successful entrepreneur, he was neither educated nor articulate and what the professional blacks knew, that the poorer blacks didn’t, is that because of his lack of education and ability to communicate, no one would have taken him serious in addition to not having the skills to navigate a complex system like city government. The man literally sounds like he doesn’t have an education beyond elementary school.
So we’re stuck in this conundrum where who may be best for black people (and I actually think Willie Wilson was the best for black
Chicagoans) are not actually viable options because they lack other critical skills that are required for successful leadership. Which is why a committee based off of elections will never work because agreement across the board will damn near be impossible.