"Blacks Are Stealing History" Egypt, Sumer, China, Maya etc etc

In my presentations on the ourstory, I notice that a common sentiment is that "Blacks are stealing history", or "oh you guys are so desperate". This has to be one of the greatest projections that the non Black World places on Black people of African descent. I first started noticing this when it came to ancient Kemet. The white Devils would try to shame our people from claiming our rightful heritage by gaslighting us to believe that the modern inhabitants of Egypt today are the descendants of ancient Kemet. The Devils would say wicked lying shyt like "you're robbing Egypt of it's history", "you're ashamed of West Africa", and all types of insane projections. Which we know is a lie.

Proof of the African Origins of All Civilizations
https://www.thecoli.com/threads/nile-valley-origins-of-all-world-civilizations-ancient-race-relations.777687/​

Literally the first people on this Earth in all corners were Black Africans of distinct types, and they first successfully left Africa anywhere from 100k-50k years ago. These people remained heavily melaninated until within the last 4,000 years, and this change in phenotype came from admixture from populations from the Caucus (whites). The people who brought civilization into every corner of the Earth during various phases were Black African migrants, and this is how the pattern went when it came to the hostile takeover of those formerly Black cultures/civilizations;

"First, they settles in a country in small groups and were partly assimilated. Over a period of time their numbers increased. Once they reach a numerical majority they joined forces with other Indo-European speaking groups to militarily overthrow the original inhabitants in a specific area and take political power. Since these communities occupied by the blacks often saw themselves as residents of a city-state, they would ignored the defeat of their neighbors. This typified their second form of invasion of the countries formerly ruled by the Proto-Saharans/Kushytes/Blacks.

All of these Places were Black




Blacks have failed even today to recognize that even though whites are highly nationalistic and engaged in numerous fratricidal wars, they tend to unify temporarily to defeat non-European people. As a result in case where the Blacks have been politically organized into states or Empires, rather than isolated city-states, the large political units have lasted for hundreds of years as typified by ancient Egypt, Axum, Mali and ancient Ghana.") - C Winters

No this is NOT simply NOI rhetoric, them things leaving the Caucus is a historically recognized event.


​

The entire World for the most part has varying degrees of Black admixture, rather it be recent or in the distant past. These populations who are "non Black", but have "Black ancestry" that they love to deny. Through that very denial they deny that the original people of the civilization or culture were Black. Many of these mullatocized populations really want to believe that their mixed race phenotypes are an aboriginal human feature, and it again goes back to them doing their best to deny their Black ancestry in the face of whites supremacy. This includes the entire so called "Middle East", East Asia, the Americas and even Europe. All of these places were originally settled by Black Africans, but were eventually misceginated beyond recognition.

*Just a side note.... The very existence of this network of horrendous lies about this topic is all the validation needed for me to prove that whites are the physical embodiment of lower human self/Devils. It therefore baffles me when negroes cape for these creatures humanity, when they unapologetically try to prove the opposite...almost to see if you are so weak that you would lie for them... rant over.

Edit; Since we really got dumb ass nikkas thinking that Kemet was not Black African, and not related to the Bantu-Niger-Congo Speakers I'll repost this unrefuted evidence

 

"I was talking to a friend about the modern phenomenon of Afrocentrism, and how a lot of people of African descent feel the need to steal the history of other people in order to feel-good about their racial identity. Which is why you see things like the Black Egyptian propaganda, the Hebrew Israelite, the Black Olmecs, the Black Xia dynasty, and other very vicious and demonic lies."

Eurocentric revisionism?

"The situation as of 2020 is fairly simple:

Africa south of the sahara is simply lagging behind.. Some countries are doing better, some are doing worse, but generally the picture is pretty grim.

• Locals did their best to develop and basically failed
• Then came europeans with new technology and what amounts to unlimited capital... and failed (so it is important to note that failure in sub saharan Africa is independent of the population)
• Then the europeans left (or were made to leave in some cases) , the locals tried again and so far have been mostly failing

These serial failures are due to objective difficult conditions such as (obviously there will be some local exceptions) poor soil for agriculture, lack of domesticated large animals (such as horses and cows, except again in some areas), distances, tropical diseases, difficult terrain etc....
The area with the best conditions is South Africa... Not surprisingly this was the only real colony for the europeans, with a large white population moving in to settle (and the largest current white/european origin population of any african country)... And the country which performs best economically

Sub Saharan Africa is roughly twice the size of Europe, but was much less populous until the 20th century (and is still much less populous than China or India)

These difficult conditions are not new. Hence going back in time, to claim that there were some super advanced civilizations in the area is strange, and akin to the Atlantis myth.... Yes some areas were doing relatively well, there were cities, trade , some local production of various artefacts etc... But these areas were not "global players"....

Will this change in the future ? yes, as tech advances, there are more opportunities to negate natural disadvantages and speed up development (this is already happening in some countries).. Larger populations make for larger economies which are then able to finance further development...

Having said this , some famous "westerners" have one or several african ancestors.. This is for example the (exotic) case of Pushkin whose grandfather was black.... It is not "afro centric" to say so... but it would be strange to link Pushkin's work to some african legacy, as Pushkin was fully a product of his society..."

An honest look at Afrocentrism...


Why do Afrocentrics want to claim ancient Middle Eastern history as black?
An honest look at Afrocentrism...

Why do Afrocentists try to relate themselves to Egypt rather than claim their real history? (country, life)

Read more: Why do Afrocentists try to relate themselves to Egypt rather than claim their real history? (country, life) - Africa - Page 51 - City-Data Forum

"Egypt was not part of Africa, that is a modern construct. Egypt was part of Levantine civilization. Like North African amazighs Egyptians were a Middle Eastern people. Olive toned berbers inhabited North “Africa” for 60 thousand years, are you going to steal their history too? The Sahara desert was an insurmountable natural barrier that separated the Middle East and North Africa from the rest of Africa. Stop peddling Afrocentrism and stop stealing history from Egyptian people."

 

I would like to say that Egypt is African history, but we as decendents of West Africans don't have much relation to them. Egypt is still a historical marvel

 

All Imma say is you are misinformed. I provided a link to prove why.

The REAL KEMITES/EGPYTIANS
















​

 

1# trace back far enough and it was all black.
2# Egypt is in.......ya'll ready?????
AFRICA!!

to think that every patch of Africa had
nothing but black but Egypt didnt is fukkin stupid.

 

which is why crackas did everything in their
power to try to separate Egypt from Africa.
They couldnt bring themselves
to believe that the people they had in
bondage were capable of such things.

 

ADOS are generally West and Central Africans. Is Egypt part of the African story? Certainly. But it's not the story of Black Americans nor really any African descended population in the Americas. At least not directly.

 

Ancient Egyptians traveled though out the African continent with connections as far west as Nigeria. West Africans have more in connection with Kenet then cacs have with Ancient Greek and Rome and your average cac has no problem bigging up Greek and Rome as a testament to WHITE civilization even though most cacs aren’t Greek or Roman

Why do y’all have such low self-esteem?!

many connections West Africa has with Kemet, I don’t feel like googling much but here’s one:

 

because It makes no sense first it was Jews, then it was the moors, now it’s the Egyptians. Which one is it because understand you CAN NOT be all 3. It’s absolutely not possible

 

Don't none of that mean shyt if it all got took and you broke. nikkas tryna come up with the rent, damn some 1325 a.d. lessons

 

The ignorance of this post

Why CANT it be all three?? Do you even know the timespans and continents all three reigned??

 

you do know they are in direct contrast with each other. I highly doubt the Islamic caliphate that produced moors would integrate with Jewish people. You MAY be able to make that argument with the Egyptians because of their close relationship with Islam but that’s about it. You do know the same Islamic caliphate led to both the Arab slave trade and the transatlantic slave trade which the moors engaged in? That’s one aspect you people continue to gloss over but at the same time you champion these people?! The madness displayed here is insane

 

Low self esteem? I'm fully Nigerian and have ancestors who were citizens of one of the greatest empires in African history (Benin Empire). There's no evidence of large numbers of Egyptians moving to that area and DNA samples show that West Africans are a different haplogroup than Northeast Africans. Africans are the most genetically and culturally diverse people in the world.

You can admire Egypt but don't erase individual African identity to fulfill a wet dream.

A

 

They care so much about Egypt because it's the only African civilization the Western media regularly portrays

 

Where do most West African tribes claim they came from before they settled in West Africa according to both oral traditions and written scribal history in the 80 or so libraries in Timbuktu? As well as what's recorded in post Middle ages West African manuscripts like Tarikh Al-Sudan and Tarikh Al-Fattash? Why is the oldest clade of Supposed "West African DNA" markers found in the Levant/West Asia and not West/Central Africa?

Ramses III carried a paternal DNA marker that 80% of "ADOS" males carry. So how you figure our particular line has NOTHING to do with Egyptian history in antiquity? Although Ramses III father Setnakthe was likely an Asiatic who had no proven geneaological link with any previous Egyptian dynasty...but that's a whole nother discussion.

But to say we have NO geneaological links with Egypt in antiquity?

DNA says that's wholly incorrect.