Torn apart by four horses facing NESW
vs a bullet behind the ear 
.
This is correct
Last edited:
Boiling lobsters alive now illegal in some countries
- Thread starter Legalese
- Start date
Torn apart by four horses facing NESW
vs a bullet behind the ear .
Cave Savage
Feminist
shyt is cruel.
You can stab its head or electrocute it right before you cook it and it will be just as fresh
You can stab its head or electrocute it right before you cook it and it will be just as fresh
Yal brehs don't look up chick culling. Poor b*stards have the unfortunate luck of being born male, into the macerator.
Who the fukk was talking about trophy hunters in Africa? Suddenly is someone hunts pigs for meat then they're the same as someone killing an endangered animal? You're really doubling down on the dumb false equivalencies right now.
Once again, I have never heard of ANYONE who actually has to kill in their job claiming that there's no difference and it's just chill to torture something for as long as possible because it's gonna die anyway. If you're okay with watching something suffer for an extended period of time when you have the choice to end it quickly instead, then you have something wrong with your soul.
That's just total nonsense from someone who clearly has no experience at all.
I guess war crimes are okay too, since the difference is "purely subjective" then you might as well rape and torture the enemy while you at it if they're gonna die anyway, no difference right?
They being obtuse as fukk. What kind of sociopath would say they're okay with being tortured if they gonna die in the end anyway?
Artificial Intelligence
Not Allen Iverson
.......................
Last edited:
Road20
All Star
You put it in the freezer for about 30-45 min. The cold pretty much numbs them. Then you boil it they won't feel it. There's also a cut you can make that will kill it mercifully
Cave Savage
Feminist
It would be more enforceable against restaurants. And a lot (including Red Lobster) already don't boil lobsters alive.
why?
BobbyWojak
Superstar
You're making it about mindless torture no one is advocating for that, the point is there is no tangible difference between the two other than personal subjective morals. Your rape analogy is childish, they're livestock not human
.
Fight torture with more torture
You're making it about mindless torture no one is advocating for that, the point is there is no tangible difference between the two other than personal subjective morals. Your rape analogy is childish, they're livestock not human
Breh you can't claim that morals are just personal and subjective and then insist that you get to decide exactly where the dividing lines are.
If you think morality is all subjective and torture is cool, then you do you but the rest of society ain't gonna listen to your shyt. If you think that there really is an objective morality and causing extra suffering is only okay in "certain situations" then you better be able to defend your argument. Simply declaring "suffering is fine if you're gonna die anyway!" ain't an argument that anyone is going to buy in any other situation, so why would it hold here?