Boise St. prof: we need a sexual counterrevolution; no women in medicine, law, engineering, trades

[Dusty Bake Activate]

If I agreed with them 100%, why wouldn't I admit it?

It's pitiful you really have your life wrapped up in this little closet of the world.

Go breastfeed your kids

So do you agree with him or not?

 

[Mowgli]

So do you agree with him or not?

I agree on some points and I disagree on others.

I don't agree with the responses of most the callers.

 

[Xyrax]

Republicans really want to live out the Handmaidens tale

Straight up. Mfers are legit weirdos. I distance myself from any weak men who carry this disturbed mindset. nikkas really out here feeling threatened by women. shyt is bizarre.

 

[el_oh_el]

Sounds like you're wrong brother. it means exactly what I said....people today wouldn't be here if the people of yesteryear didn't have children. People before had a ton of children and nowadays, they don't. What sort of society you think the future will be without people?

The amount of mental gymnastics y'all be doing for such simple concepts is crazy.

there are more than enough people alive on the planet right now. Society as a whole would be better off with less consumers fukking up the planet buying useless junk that never degrades. This argument doesn’t make much sense because there’s really not many negatives that matter that can be seen with having less people roam the earth, unless you the type that wants population growth to feed the capitalism machine

 

[WaveMolecules]

I ask a question and you choose to be semantic. I don't know if you're on your period but I don't
See that acceptance in articles online. I see men struggling with their manhood. You wouldn't know what I'm getting at because you don't want to.

the fact that having a period is a negative in your eyes encapsulates feminist struggles.

again your world view is defined by patriarchy. im not sayin that the patriarchy is wrong all together but as society moves FORWARD we must adjust and afford equal opportunities to everyone despite their gender.

dead ass i feel sorry for your children. their dad put them in a box before they even had a chance to grow up.

youre indoctrinated so i dont fully blame you

 

[mahnameizray]

there are more than enough people alive on the planet right now. Society as a whole would be better off with less consumers fukking up the planet buying useless junk that never degrades. This argument doesn’t make much sense because there’s really not many negatives that matter that can be seen with having less people roam the earth, unless you the type that wants population growth to feed the capitalism machine

If you think I'm arguing with you, you already missed the point.

I'm the type of person that knows that I wouldn't be here if people didn't have sex and procreate. If you look around, you'd notice there's an agenda that's out there that want people to procreate less. Again, how is a society supposed to thrive if there are no people?

 

[Neuromancer]

the fact that having a period is a negative in your eyes encapsulates feminist struggles.

again your world view is defined by patriarchy. im not sayin that the patriarchy is wrong all together but as society moves FORWARD we must adjust and afford equal opportunities to everyone despite their gender.

dead ass i feel sorry for your children. their dad put them in a box before they even had a chance to grow up.

youre indoctrinated so i dont fully blame you

Your histrionic response was the only negative thing I noted. You broke into a strawman song and dance right out of the mangina playbook. I agree about Equal opportunity but the articles of men struggling to reconcil what they are because they stay at home vs what they are not is a real thing whether you want to admit it or not.

 

[Neuromancer]

instead of trying to social engineer a lifestyle that limits a persons choices and/or opportunities, just find someone who wants the same arrangement sans coercement.

The problem is that everyone wants everyone else to live or think their way. This guy is just the other side of the coin to people who want everyone to live and think some other way.

But news flash, everyone wants something different and there are more than enough people who you can find will deal with you on your level. The problem is no one wants that it seems they want sweeping everyone should do this type scenarios and life doesn't work that way.

 

[Pull Up the Roots]

If you think I'm arguing with you, you already missed the point.

I'm the type of person that knows that I wouldn't be here if people didn't have sex and procreate. If you look around, you'd notice there's an agenda that's out there that want people to procreate less. Again, how is a society supposed to thrive if there are no people?

 

[WaveMolecules]

This is about cacs and their negative birthrate

yes

Just wait til he gets the courage to say his feelings about who should own property.

yup

damn. never put two and two together like that.

valid

Your histrionic response was the only negative thing I noted. You broke into a straw-man* song and dance right out of the mangina playbook. I agree about Equal opportunity but the articles of men struggling to reconcile* what they are because they stay at home vs what they are not is a real thing whether you want to admit it or not.

men are only half of society and i dont see how supporting the other HALFs right to EQUALITY makes me anything but fair.

i hope your gf or wife knows how you feel about women and their rights, especially when it comes to their "manginas"

 

[Neuromancer]

men are only half of society and i dont see how supporting the other HALFs right to EQUALITY makes me anything but fair

I feel like you either aren't reading what I'm writing or cherry picking so you can be upset. Which ever it is, enjoy your night.

 

[OliviaTwist]

It’s funny that the same group of people that claim to be superior to everyone gets threatened when those they deem lesser have equal footing. That’s like Usain Bolt being upset that we both at the starting line knowing he’s going to win anyway.

If he cares so much about women having to choose between a family and a career, then he would advocate for there to be more support for these women since most households rely on the mothers income. Not their outright removal.

Or he could advocate for men to increase their share of household duties but he doesn’t want that either .

 

[el_oh_el]

If you think I'm arguing with you, you already missed the point.

I'm the type of person that knows that I wouldn't be here if people didn't have sex and procreate. If you look around, you'd notice there's an agenda that's out there that want people to procreate less. Again, how is a society supposed to thrive if there are no people?

Depends on what "thrive" means to you. "No people" is hyperbole

 

[You Win Perfect]

Also this is completely unrealistic in today's economy. If he isn't also arguing for higher wages and lowering living costs then he should really shut the fukk up.

#betaBabble

 

[Micky Mikey]

#betaBabble

Take a break from YouTube breh