"Both sides are the same"... anybody who says this is a dumbass and should be slapped on sight

[Scholar]

She was not a fukking neocon.

Jesus. fukking. Christ.

You all just sling buzzwords like its halloween candy and expect daps and reps for that shyt to your co-lowbrow residents in the hell hole of irrelevancy where your ideological peers reside.

Grow the fu¢k up

Honestly surprised you didn't write that in all caps and in bold. Try to at least hear people out when they call her a neocon so we can get some sort of a discussion going

 

[Mantis Toboggan M.D.]

• Hillary would not have nominated Gorsuch to the Supreme Court (a decision with decades-long consequences...)

• Hillary would not have supported the repeal of the ACA.

• Hillary would not have proposed a budget that reduced EPA funding by 30%

• Hillary would not have appointed racist ass Sessions as Attorney General

• Hillary would not have nominated unqualified ass DeVos as Secretary of Education.

I can go on...

These are clear differences that have a direct effect on us as citizens.

FOH to anyone that says that "there's no difference" or "voting doesn't matter". fukk off. Neg train. Instant ignore. It's not up for debate.

Added that part for you

 

[JahFocus CS]

But do the democrats use blatantly racist dog whistle tactics to drum up votes among poorly educated white people who fear people of color?

Hillary did quite a bit against Obama in 2008.

 

[THE MACHINE]

Democrats are the only ones who hate the "both sides are evil" argument.

They're still desperate to get people to vote for their garbage party with their "lesser of two evils" bullshyt.

Dems are the lesser of two evils though.

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

Honestly surprised you didn't write that in all caps and in bold. Try to at least hear people out when they call her a neocon so we can get some sort of a discussion going

Theres nothing to hear.

Ya'll been trying your hardest to sink HRC.

Congratulations.

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

Better than trump is a low benchmark when it's arguable we haven't seen a worse political figure since Stalin died. The only difference between him and men like that is that his attempts to commit the same atrocities is that said attempts are in the future and not the past.

OK. Stalin wasn't THE worst leader of the 20th century. He's probably not even top 5.

That remaining, Trump was worse than Hillary. Idiots voted for him. End of story.

We did our part.

 

[Scholar]

Theres nothing to hear.

Ya'll been trying your hardest to sink HRC.

Congratulations.

You're better off trying to hear em out instead of blocking out a differing view

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

• Hillary would not have nominated Gorsuch to the Supreme Court (a decision with decades-long consequences...)

• Hillary would not have supported the repeal of the ACA.

• Hillary would not have proposed a budget that reduced EPA funding by 30%

• Hillary would not have appointed racist ass Sessions as Attorney General

• Hillary would not have nominated unqualified ass DeVos as Secretary of Education.

I can go on...

These are clear differences that have a direct effect on us as citizens.

FOH to anyone that says that "there's no difference" or "voting doesn't matter". fukk off. Instant ignore. It's not up for debate.

I just don't get it.

If you're black you can't tell me how Trump helps you in ANY way. Dude is damn hear giving hand jobs to white supremacists.

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

You're better off trying to hear em out instead of blocking out the a differing view

Fu¢k'em.

Hearing the same old shyt with a new voice is a waste of my time.

I know them, better than they know themselves.

 

[Scholar]

Fu¢k'em.

Hearing the same old shyt with a new voice is a waste of my time.

I know them, better than they know themselves.

In order to make it extremely clear to people, dems need to embrace progressive stances on policies

 

[Black Nate Grey]

She was not a fukking neocon.

Jesus. fukking. Christ.

You all just sling buzzwords like its halloween candy and expect daps and reps for that shyt to your co-lowbrow residents in the hell hole of irrelevancy where your ideological peers reside.

Grow the fu¢k up

I don't care about dap and rep, it's an anonymous internet forum, I have a life outside of it. I've been here 3 years and have yet to break 3k posts. That tactic might work with someone else though Mr. 114k.

When people think "Hilary Rodham Clinton" they do not think 'liberal' nor do they particularly think she is left leaning. You know what they do think? "Establishment", "More of the same", "Typical Washington Bureaucrat", and that buzzword you do so hate; 'Neocon'.
And that's her problem, she is either unwilling or incapable of changing her image. Whether those labels apply to her or not. How you are perceived, your image is the single most important thing in political campaigns.

Obama- Put out an image of change, hope. "Yes we can". It's inclusive, encouraging others to participate, gives them the illusion they will partake in change.
Sanders- Again portrays an image of change.
Trump- Was a radical shift, embodied change. "Make America Great Again". A grand, sweeping statement that promised something different.

Hilary- Yeah, no. "I'm with Her". Terrible slogan because it puts the onus on the voter to think about what they are saying. Yes, but who are you with? Who is Hilary Clinton? Someone who puts out an image of change or more of the same status quo?

People are idiots, politically. Tell them, sell to them that they need something different, that what they have is not enough and they will bite. It's simple.
That's the problem with your ilk and Hilary along with her campaigners, you don't understand people. By all measures Hilary should have crushed Trump both by popular and electoral votes. She had all the tools, the political backing and the intellect.

Be less catty and don't quote me again without a proper answer.

 

[Domingo Halliburton]

Better than trump is a low benchmark when it's arguable we haven't seen a worse political figure since Stalin died. The only difference between him and men like that is that his attempts to commit the same atrocities is that said attempts are in the future and not the past.

You are such a terrible.poster.

 

[Mantis Toboggan M.D.]

You are such a terrible.poster.

 

[kevm3]

They throw slight crumbs to the peons of 'their party' and create strawmen for their constituents to fight over, but in the overarching agenda, yes, they are the same. The rich keep getting richer, we keep losing more of our freedoms and we're in nonstop wars.

 

[Domingo Halliburton]

:smilies:

And I'm not even trying to defend Trump here. Youre just bad. You see how off-putting Napoleon is above us? That's you, but weirdly trying to be "down" with perceived black guys on the internet. Which is somehow more sad.