Brady>Manning End Of Story

Turk

Young, Gifted, and Black
Joined
Aug 10, 2014
Messages
24,096
Reputation
12,164
Daps
134,578
Reppin
Southside
:umad:
and if they hand the ball off to lynch and they win then the storyline doesn't exist, right?


fukk off with this shyt, teams win superbowls, not individuals. brady got a ton of help from his receviers all night, that made a ton of plays AFTER THE CATCH, he got bailed out by his defense and fukked them with those picks(which both led to points) and he was throwing it in the ground when he got pressured. it wasn't some all time great game or anything, but the rest of the team showed up too and helped him win it. it's a lot easier to win games when the entire team shows up to play.

last year the broncos d gave up tds on literally every drive. the pats didnt, they held them in check and helped get them back in the game and then sealed the game. yall keep going on with your dumbass narratives when anyone that understands football knows that superbowls are won by the best teams.
:umad::umad::umad:
 

KOBE

Superstar
Joined
Apr 30, 2014
Messages
7,719
Reputation
1,100
Daps
34,383
ya breh, i am mad. mad at the seahawks for fukking this game up and having it come to this shyt.


you guys had a hell of a year and a hell of a turn around for that chiefs game. it was spectacular how your team came together and stayed committed and finished it off with a superbowl. great coaching, great running by blount, and an overall solid defensive effort aside from those huge bomb plays.

i just find this shyt annoying, these stupid GOAT arguments. Brady didn't win that game nor did he lose it. It's not all on the QB, he did his part in order to win and they won because of it, but he wasn't singe handedly carrying the fukking team to victory. If Seahawks score there is it Brady's fault that they lose the game? Of course not, HE DID HIS PART, it would have been on the defense for fukking it up in the end. Again, it's the better overall team that wins the superbowl, not the best QB.

And if we really want to make it about how QBs perform and how great they are in the superbowl, then no one even comes close to Montana and Marino is a complete and utter bum. There's no logic in these stupid arguments that superbowls make one qb better than another. QB wins isn't a real thing, teams win, individuals don't. Wilson isn't a better QB than Luck because he has a ring and has gone to two superbowls, is he?
 

aceboon

Veteran
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
40,555
Reputation
4,868
Daps
131,021
Reppin
NULL
First int didn't lead to points, although it cost the Pats points.

and if they hand the ball off to lynch and they win then the storyline doesn't exist, right?


fukk off with this shyt, teams win superbowls, not individuals. brady got a ton of help from his receviers all night, that made a ton of plays AFTER THE CATCH, he got bailed out by his defense and fukked them with those picks(which both led to points) and he was throwing it in the ground when he got pressured. it wasn't some all time great game or anything, but the rest of the team showed up too and helped him win it. it's a lot easier to win games when the entire team shows up to play.

last year the broncos d gave up tds on literally every drive. the pats didnt, they held them in check and helped get them back in the game and then sealed the game. yall keep going on with your dumbass narratives when anyone that understands football knows that superbowls are won by the best teams.
 

L&HH

Veteran
Joined
May 18, 2012
Messages
53,910
Reputation
5,970
Daps
163,241
Reppin
PG x MD
What's even the case for Manning now?

Honestly, I'd like to hear the argument because you'd have to be a wizard to convince someone to think Manning > Brady.

Imo it's the same argument there is for LeBron James and it's the one thing people keep ignoring when they look at the greatness of these players it's the head coaching

Bill Belichick
Phil Jackson
Greg Popovich

You give manning Belichick or Carroll even and I believe he wins at least 3 rings
 

Savior

Superstar
Joined
May 16, 2012
Messages
4,946
Reputation
1,030
Daps
12,878
Reppin
#byrdgang
and if they hand the ball off to lynch and they win then the storyline doesn't exist, right?


fukk off with this shyt, teams win superbowls, not individuals. brady got a ton of help from his receviers all night, that made a ton of plays AFTER THE CATCH, he got bailed out by his defense and fukked them with those picks(which both led to points) and he was throwing it in the ground when he got pressured. it wasn't some all time great game or anything, but the rest of the team showed up too and helped him win it. it's a lot easier to win games when the entire team shows up to play.

last year the broncos d gave up tds on literally every drive. the pats didnt, they held them in check and helped get them back in the game and then sealed the game. yall keep going on with your dumbass narratives when anyone that understands football knows that superbowls are won by the best teams.

What youre ignoring is the fact that this was by far the best performance by a QB against the LOB in a meaningful game the past few years. We were ready to crown seattle as a top 3 all time D. Yea he threw 2 ints but also made the plays when it counted. He found holes in the D that no other QB has come close to finding and set the SB completions record. Rodgers the gawd last week didnt move the ball NEARLY as well and couldnt get it done in the redzone. Peyton last year.....well we aint even gotta go there :russ:. So yea Brady deserves all the props he gets for this game because he got it done against one of the greatest D's of all time.
 

BLAZO da GAWD

Superstar
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
9,093
Reputation
1,470
Daps
18,142
Reppin
NEW ERA
Imo it's the same argument there is for LeBron James and it's the one thing people keep ignoring when they look at the greatness of these players it's the head coaching

Bill Belichick
Phil Jackson
Greg Popovich

You give manning Belichick or Carroll even and I believe he wins at least 3 rings
What weakens your argument is Beli was a coach before Zeus :sas-1: and it wasn't pretty :sas-1:
 
Last edited:

KOBE

Superstar
Joined
Apr 30, 2014
Messages
7,719
Reputation
1,100
Daps
34,383
What youre ignoring is the fact that this was by far the best performance by a QB against the LOB in a meaningful game the past few years. We were ready to crown seattle as a top 3 all time D. Yea he threw 2 ints but also made the plays when it counted. He found holes in the D that no other QB has come close to finding and set the SB completions record. Rodgers the gawd last week didnt move the ball NEARLY as well and couldnt get it done in the redzone. Peyton last year.....well we aint even gotta go there :russ:. So yea Brady deserves all the props he gets for this game because he got it done against one of the greatest D's of all time.

so we're ignoring the fact that lane got hurt on his INT, that avril left with a concussion after they forced a 3 and out, and that both earl/sherman were playing hurt and missing tackles?

this wasn't the same LOB brah.

And your post already shows revisionist history of what actually went down. Brady wasn't throwing bombs or strikes, they were slant plays and the receivers were outrunning the defenders or just simply making them miss tackles, there was a lot of YAC in the game and that certainly helped boost those stats.
 
Top