Breaking: Boston bushes unvaxxed

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

MY POINT REMAINS

Yeah, it remains invalid. Here's why...

 

[Sccit]

Yeah, it remains invalid. Here's why...

WAIT

SO IF SCIENTIFIC STUDIES IN THE FIELD OF MEDICINE HAVE BEEN REGULARLY WRONG IN THE PAST

HOW DOES THAT NOT APPLY? HOW AM I MOVING THE GOAL POST??

THATS EXACTLY WHAT U DOIN “OH BECAUSE ITS MRNA U CAN TRUST IT NOW!” LMAO

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

SO IF SCIENTIFIC STUDIES IN THE FIELD OF MEDICINE HAVE BEEN REGULARLY WRONG IN THE PAST

That would be a valid point if not for the regularity of them being right far more often than wrong.​

 

[GUWOPPERS]

But the vaccine doesn't prevent transmission

It lowers the viral load. If you're around 5 vax people who have it, you are less likely to catch it than if you were around 5 unvaxxed people that had it.

You'd know that if you did any worthwhile research.

 

[Sccit]

That would be a valid point if not for the regularity of them being right far more often than wrong.​

ITS A VERY VALID POINT WHEN THE CHANCES OF LIVING THROUGH COVID IS 99.98% FOR SOMEONE IN MY AGE RANGE

WIT THE AMOUNT OF COMMERCIALS WE REGULARLY SEE ABOUT LEGAL COMPENSATION BEING OFFERED FOR SOME MEDICINE THAT GOT PULLED DUE TO CATASTROPHIC SIDE EFFECTS, IM WILLIN TO TAKE THAT .02% GAMBLE .. IF YOURE NOT, MORE POWER TO YOU.

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

ITS A VERY VALID POINT WHEN THE CHANCES OF LIVING THROUGH COVID IS 99.98% FOR SOMEONE IN MY AGE RANGE

Source?​

 

[Blackrogue]

There’s literally a thread on it

Black people account for 22.1% of the nation’s COVID-19 deaths despite only being 12.8% of the pop.

also wtf does Africa have to do with black Americans? That doesn’t even make sense

You said black people. You didn't say black Americans. Thank you for the link

 

[The Wall Is Undefeated!]

Of course. But why give COVID-19 more reps in adapting in human environments? Why not take risk preventative measures?

The virus has already adapted to human environments. Even without a human environment, a virus will still find a way to fukk us over. We thought the vaxx would be a silver bullet to the Wuhanvirus... Turn out it was wrong. For all, we know there could be a coronavirus that hasn't adapted to a human environment, yet complete resists the corona vax.

You can't have your cake and eat it too. As soon as your decision-making and choices threaten the health and safety of other individuals, you subject yourself to regulation. You anti-vaxxers are like smokers who think it's only freedom if you get to smoke in a restaurant or theater or not get fired for smoking in the work conference room.

You don't want to get vaccinated because we don't know enough about potential long term complications? Well I don't want to get COVID because we don't know enough about the long term complications. See how that works?

Difference is most of the unvaccinated people are the same ones who insisted on not wearing a mask pre-vaxx like it was their personal civil rights movement - everyone else be damned. It doesn't work that way.

Typical foolishness of calling somebody an 'anti-vaxxer' without any evidence. I won't waste my time with the rest of your crap.

 

[mobbinfms]

I DONT BELIEVE ANYTHING THE CDC SAYS BECAUSE THEYVE BEEN CAUGHT LYING WAY TOO MANY TIMES TO BE A TRUSTWORTHY SOURCE

IM SIMPLY SHOWING U THAT, DESPITE THE FEAR MONGERING, EVEN YOUR GOD HAS CONCLUDED THAT THE CHANCES OF COVID BEING DANGEROUS TO PEOPLE IN OUR AGE DEMOGRAPHIC ARE SLIM TO NONE

BUT THAT DOESNT TAKE “RESEARCH” TO CONCLUDE.. JUST A BIT OF COMMON SENSE

Dangerous and deadly are two different things. I agree with you that the risk of death is very small, but there is also serious illness, hospitalization and long COVID to contend with. Not to mention that even if the risk of death for someone in our age range (I’m 41 and I assume you are 35+) is very small, because this is a highly transmissible airborne disease, we could transmit it directly or indirectly to someone who it will put in the hospital or kill.

 

[mobbinfms]

WHAT ARE THE FACTS YOURE RELYING ON TO BELIEVE IT?

I’m not questioning the data. I don’t even know how a person could without access to the underlying data and the ability to run the numbers themselves. You are questioning the data, so I’m wondering why?

 

[mobbinfms]

GOD

 

[SwizzLake]

You said black people. You didn't say black Americans. Thank you for the link

What do those stats really mean?

 

[mobbinfms]

THE SAME “VERIFIABLE DATA” THAT FOR DECADES TOLD US ZANTAC WAS A PERFECTLY SAFE DRUG TO TAKE BEFORE IT WAS RECENTLY RECALLED FOR CAUSING CANCER?

NO THANKS.. IF MY CHANCES OF LIVING WITOUT THE VACCINE ARE 99.98%, I’M “ROLLING THAT DICE” 10/10 TIMES.

Interesting. I can see that perspective. I take it you don’t take any over the counter or prescription medicines and grow your own food and have your own water source?

 

[mobbinfms]

ITS A VERY VALID POINT WHEN THE CHANCES OF LIVING THROUGH COVID IS 99.98% FOR SOMEONE IN MY AGE RANGE

WIT THE AMOUNT OF COMMERCIALS WE REGULARLY SEE ABOUT LEGAL COMPENSATION BEING OFFERED FOR SOME MEDICINE THAT GOT PULLED DUE TO CATASTROPHIC SIDE EFFECTS, IM WILLIN TO TAKE THAT .02% GAMBLE .. IF YOURE NOT, MORE POWER TO YOU.

So you are relying on the CDC to assess the risk of COVID but they aren’t reliable as to the vaccine?

Also - do you know the percentage of medications/food pulled due to health risks as compared to the total amount of medicines/foods approved?

 

[Sccit]

Source?​

CDC

I POSTED IT UP IN THIS THREAD