I'm confused, there is no way Cleveland was a "super-team" in the sense that they were stacked, they won a lot of regular season games but so did Dallas for years. But Bron still won the MVP. Of course you have to have team success, but all those wins in the EC weren't THAT impressive when you see how bad the Conference was. (I'd have to see their record against the west). A better argument would have been, imo, that with that same team in the West, Bron is a superstar on a team playing for 4-6th seed.
Nash won two MVPs with...Amar'e, Olajuwon with Vernon Maxwell and Drexler, Dirk with Jason Terry, I mean we can flip the great teamate argument the other way. I don't believe anyone lately has had such a stacked team from top to bottom as Bron, I might be wrong but I don't see it.
Kobe was hated only because he's Kobe, he's been hated since he came in the league, and hated whether he won or not, so he's not even in the discussion imo. T-Mac is ridiculed for that statement of "finally being in the 2nd round" and for becoming 
, no one HATES T-Mac. And never have I heard people talk slick about Garnett when he was in Minny, if anything people saw him as a "good guy" who was "loyal" (remember that teary-eyed intw with Thompson?), if anything people started hating when he won in Boston.
The most valuable player on the best team in the league is the MVP. Period.
are you saying your opinion =fact 
It would be one thing, if a player was being carried by that team, but if he leads in EVERY STATISTICAL CATEGORY, that implies he is the reason that team is the best in the league. And I never said my opinion is fact, I implied that's how they system works. Historically, the best player with great stats on top team wins the mvp. Deny that if you want, but the voters will show that i'm correct 
you struggled mightily without him in the playoffs . He's your high quality big man
Kidd hurt. He the MVP? Value must be backed up with stats to hold any weight with the voters.
