BREAKING: FED JUDGE - Barr lied to Federal Court and Congress about decision not to charge Trump

Discussion in 'Higher Learning' started by ♛ ★ ⋯ Éminence grise, May 4, 2021.

  1. ♛ ★ ⋯ Éminence grise

    ♛ ★ ⋯ Éminence grise The Original Hall of Shame Supporter WOAT

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2012
    Messages:
    250,412
    Daps Received:
    545,535
    Reppin:
    Deep State University
    Reputation:
    -19,063
    Coli Cash:
    $9100.00



    Judge Says Barr Misled on How His Justice Dept. Viewed Trump’s Actions

    Judge Says Barr Misled on How His Justice Dept. Viewed Trump’s Actions
    Judge Amy Berman Jackson said in a ruling that the misleading statements were similar to others that William P. Barr, the former attorney general, had made about the Mueller investigation.
    May 4, 2021Updated 8:04 p.m. ET
    [​IMG]
    Former Attorney General William P. Barr was singled out for how he spun the Russia investigation’s findings in a summary of the Mueller report.Doug Mills/The New York Times
    A federal judge in Washington accused the Justice Department under Attorney General William P. Barr of misleading her and Congress about advice he had received from top department officials on whether President Donald J. Trump should have been charged with obstructing the Russia investigation and ordered that a related memo be released.

    Judge Amy Berman Jackson of the United States District Court in Washington said in a ruling late Monday that the Justice Department’s obfuscation appeared to be part of a pattern in which top officials like Mr. Barr were untruthful to Congress and the public about the investigation.

    The department had argued that the memo was exempt from public records laws because it consisted of private advice from lawyers whom Mr. Barr had relied on to make the call on prosecuting Mr. Trump. But Judge Jackson ruled that it contained strategic advice, and that Mr. Barr and his aides already understood what his decision would be.

    “The fact that he would not be prosecuted was a given,” Judge Jackson wrote of Mr. Trump.

    She also singled out Mr. Barr for how he had spun the investigation’s findings in a letter summarizing the 448-page report before it was released, which allowed Mr. Trump to claim he had been exonerated.

    “The attorney general’s characterization of what he’d hardly had time to skim, much less study closely, prompted an immediate reaction, as politicians and pundits took to their microphones and Twitter feeds to decry what they feared was an attempt to hide the ball,” Judge Jackson wrote.

    Her rebuke shed new light on Mr. Barr’s decision not to prosecute Mr. Trump. She also wrote that although the department portrayed the advice memo as a legal document protected by attorney-client privilege, it was done in concert with Mr. Barr’s publicly released summary, “written by the very same people at the very same time.”

    A spokeswoman for Mr. Barr did not return an email seeking comment. A Justice Department spokesman declined to comment.

    Judge Jackson said that the government had until May 17 to decide whether it planned to appeal her ruling, a decision that will be made by a Justice Department run by Biden appointees.

    The ruling came in a lawsuit by a government watchdog group, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, asking that the Justice Department be ordered to turn over a range of documents related to how top law enforcement officials cleared Mr. Trump of wrongdoing.

    At issue is how Mr. Barr handled the end of the Mueller investigation and the release of its findings to the public. In March 2019, the office of the special counsel overseeing the inquiry, Robert S. Mueller III, delivered its report to the Justice Department. In a highly unusual decision, Mr. Mueller declined to make a determination about whether Mr. Trump had illegally obstructed justice.

    Sign Up for On Politics With Lisa Lerer: A spotlight on the people reshaping our politics. A conversation with voters across the country. And a guiding hand through the endless news cycle, telling you what you really need to know.

    That opened the door for Mr. Barr to take control of the investigation. Two days after receiving the report, Mr. Barr sent a four-page letter to Congress saying that Mr. Trump would not be charged with obstructing justice and summarizing the report. Mr. Mueller’s team believed that Mr. Barr’s characterization of the document was misleading and privately urged him to release more of their findings, but Mr. Barr refused.

    About a month later, around the time that the report was released to the public, Mr. Barr testified to Congress that he had made the decision not to charge Mr. Trump “in consultation with the Office of Legal Counsel and other department lawyers,” and that the decision to clear the president of wrongdoing had been left to Mr. Barr because Mr. Mueller had made no determination about whether Mr. Trump broke the law.

    Judge Jackson said in the ruling that Mr. Barr had been disingenuous in those assertions, adding that it had not been left to him to make the decision about the prosecution.

    She also said that in the litigation between the government and Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, the Justice Department under Mr. Barr had claimed that the memo, written by his top officials, had been about legal advice he had relied on to make the decision and should be shielded from the public.

    Under federal law, the Justice Department can claim that such advice should be shielded because it is “deliberative” and the possibility of releasing it could keep advisers from giving their unvarnished counsel because they fear it may become public someday.

    But instead, Judge Jackson wrote, Mr. Barr and his aides had already decided not to bring charges against Mr. Trump. She reprimanded the department for portraying the memo as part of deliberations over whether to prosecute the president. She noted that she had been allowed to read the full memo before making her decision, over the objections of the Justice Department, and that it revealed that “excised portions belie the notion that it fell to the attorney general to make a prosecution decision or that any such decision was on the table at any time.”

    The department “has been disingenuous to this court with respect to the existence of a decision-making process that should be shielded by the deliberative process privilege,” Judge Jackson wrote.

    She oversaw the trial of Mr. Trump’s longtime adviser Roger J. Stone Jr. and one of the cases against Mr. Trump’s onetime campaign chairman Paul Manafort. Although Mr. Trump has publicly attacked Judge Jackson, legal experts say she operated as an unbiased arbiter during the Russia investigation.

    In late March, the judge similarly called into question the credibility of the Trump-era government’s description of documents in a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit brought by The New York Times for certain White House budget office emails related to Mr. Trump’s freeze on military aid to Ukraine, which led to his first impeachment.

    The Justice Department argued that the emails were exempt from disclosure and filed sworn affidavits about their contents by lawyers for the Office of Management and Budget during the Trump administration. But Judge Jackson insisted on reading the emails for herself and wrote that “the court discovered that there were obvious differences between the affiants’ description of the nature and subject matter of the documents, and the documents themselves.”

    Charlie Savage contributed reporting.
     
    Last edited: May 4, 2021
    DEAD7 and 88m3 dapped this.
  2. 88m3

    88m3 Fast Money & Foreign Objects

    Joined:
    May 21, 2012
    Messages:
    73,559
    Daps Received:
    124,313
    Reppin:
    Brooklyn
    Reputation:
    3,260
    Coli Cash:
    $3328766.00

    oh boy
     
    wire28 dapped this.
  3. acri1

    acri1 The Chosen 1 Supporter

    Joined:
    May 2, 2012
    Messages:
    17,787
    Daps Received:
    73,941
    Reppin:
    Detroit
    Reputation:
    2,740
    Coli Cash:
    $344987.00

    Unless he's going to go to jail, it rings pretty hollow at this point :francis: too little too late
     
    Rekkapryde, dblive, Reality and 7 others dapped this.
  4. Hood Critic

    Hood Critic The Power Circle

    Joined:
    May 2, 2012
    Messages:
    18,114
    Daps Received:
    84,627
    Reppin:
    דעת
    Reputation:
    2,910
    Coli Cash:
    $81598.00

    Of f*cking course they did so what are the courts and Garland's DOJ going to do about it now?
     
    wire28 dapped this.
  5. King Theo

    King Theo All Star

    Joined:
    May 1, 2012
    Messages:
    4,829
    Daps Received:
    7,362
    Reppin:
    NULL
    Reputation:
    360
    Coli Cash:
    $313465.00


    It seems at every turn the feds are saying {insert powerful cac} is the Crook and criminal you thought they were I hope us confirming it is enough enjoy your day
     
    dblive, Ricky Fontaine, wire28 and 2 others dapped this.
  6. THE MACHINE

    THE MACHINE night owl

    Joined:
    May 27, 2012
    Messages:
    24,661
    Daps Received:
    93,959
    Reppin:
    P.G. County
    Reputation:
    5,520
    Coli Cash:
    $6.27

    Let me know when they go to jail. Thats Barr and Trump
     
    wire28 and radio rahiem dapped this.
  7. ExodusNirvana

    ExodusNirvana Change is inevitable...

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2012
    Messages:
    32,864
    Daps Received:
    115,325
    Reppin:
    Brooklyn, NY
    Reputation:
    7,110
    Coli Cash:
    $100.00

    I was told that the Russia Investigation was a hoax by a number of posters in HL :hubie:
     
    Wild self, wire28 and 88m3 dapped this.
  8. Mr swag

    Mr swag We Out Here

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2012
    Messages:
    16,107
    Daps Received:
    26,742
    Reppin:
    The Well Respected Uptown,Virginia
    Reputation:
    -1,580
    Coli Cash:
    $337282.00

    Nothing and Barr knew it
     
  9. Russ

    Russ Veteran Supporter

    Joined:
    May 1, 2012
    Messages:
    38,849
    Daps Received:
    76,363
    Reputation:
    5,060
    Coli Cash:
    $109000.33

    Most these powerful people have dirt or access to dirt on other powerful people. It keeps them all protected
     
    wire28 dapped this.
  10. 88m3

    88m3 Fast Money & Foreign Objects

    Joined:
    May 21, 2012
    Messages:
    73,559
    Daps Received:
    124,313
    Reppin:
    Brooklyn
    Reputation:
    3,260
    Coli Cash:
    $3328766.00

    Yeah, it really gets me when something like this comes out every now and then like "they're really getting carried away with this hoax now amirite"!
     
  11. wire28

    wire28 Blade said what up Supporter

    Joined:
    May 1, 2012
    Messages:
    38,045
    Daps Received:
    137,353
    Reppin:
    #ByrdGang #TheColi
    Reputation:
    10,170
    Coli Cash:
    $1000.00

    We finally got him :blessed:
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice