BREAKING: RUSSIANS & CHINESE HACK SNOWDEN FILES--British spies 'moved after Snowden files read'

GSR

All Star
Joined
Jun 27, 2012
Messages
1,761
Reputation
710
Daps
6,706
Reppin
daygo
When it comes to international efforts, yes.
As opposed to domestic and international efforts? Why would they differentiate if they really cared??
:mjlol:

I'm really not. I don't know what I can say to impress this upon you all. I don't need to agree with you to do this.

I'm VERY aware, but I understand that China and Russia care even less about me.
How the fukk can you care less than zero??
:lolbron:
 

Mowgli

Veteran
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
104,340
Reputation
14,079
Daps
246,389
Nobody (especially in the internet pro-Snowden echo-chamber) wants to entertain the idea that what snowden did endangered hundreds of people directly, and the entire US indirectly, by leaking what he did. It is truly amazing to read the rationales on here avoiding this idea. :stopitslime:
Welcome to white supremacy
 

tmonster

Superstar
Joined
Nov 26, 2013
Messages
17,900
Reputation
3,205
Daps
31,792
Nobody (especially in the internet pro-Snowden echo-chamber) wants to entertain the idea that what snowden did endangered hundreds of people directly, and the entire US indirectly, by leaking what he did. It is truly amazing to read the rationales on here avoiding this idea. :stopitslime:
You need bigger font yet...I think it's having an effect...I am starting to believe you:patrice:
:whoo:yeah seriously it's growing on me
:ehh:I don't know how you are doing this
:troll:Nah
 

88m3

Fast Money & Foreign Objects
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
92,827
Reputation
3,875
Daps
165,695
Reppin
Brooklyn
You need bigger font yet...I think it's having an effect...I am starting to believe you:patrice:
:whoo:yeah seriously it's growing on me
:ehh:I don't know how you are doing this
:troll:Nah

put our national anthem on repeat and watch videos of eagles on youtube until a freedom tear rolls down your cheek
 

tru_m.a.c

IC veteran
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
31,629
Reputation
6,942
Daps
91,479
Reppin
Gaithersburg, MD via Queens/LI
the goal is to overlap sources of information

Snowden thought his shyt was safe...and it wasn't...and he's gotten/going to get people killed.

If anything I'm disturbed by the speed at which you and the rest of the twitterverse are spreading information.

What is the purpose of making this announcement and who benefits from it? Does telling the entire world that the Russians/Chinese were successful:
1) save the lives of those British spies?
2) extend the shelf life of those secret operations?
3) allow for international sanctions?
4) allow for military action?

Another thing, of the millions of files taken, how/why am I supposed to:
a) believe there was a file breach
a1- How can the British prove there was a file breach without exposing their own technological capabilities? (seems counterintuitive)
a2 - Since the files that were stolen were top secret and I'll never be able to see them, how can I actually be sure that they're not planting old evidence of their systems being hacked on Snowden
b) believe that of the millions of files stolen, all of them resulted in the movement of British spy(ies)
b1- see a2
b2 - If only 2 spies had to be moved, this would still legally fit the category of "spies," so see a2

It sounds like you all received the same Iraq WMD press releases.
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
337,479
Reputation
-34,919
Daps
640,932
Reppin
The Deep State
If anything I'm disturbed by the speed at which you and the rest of the twitterverse are spreading information.

What is the purpose of making this announcement and who benefits from it? Does telling the entire world that the Russians/Chinese were successful:
1) save the lives of those British spies?
The news reported this.This wasn't a government press conference
2) extend the shelf life of those secret operations?
Which is a good thing
3) allow for international sanctions?
4) allow for military action?
I think you're just listing things aimlessly

Another thing, of the millions of files taken, how/why am I supposed to:
a) believe there was a file breach
Huh? Its well known that these are the greatest intelligence agencies in the world with very smart people running them. They can figure this shyt out
a1- How can the British prove there was a file breach without exposing their own technological capabilities? (seems counterintuitive)
Which is why they revealed that the russians and chinese have breached the documents. You can't say "well they'd tell us nothing" if you'd also get mad they if they never you something.
a2 - Since the files that were stolen were top secret and I'll never be able to see them, how can I actually be sure that they're not planting old evidence of their systems being hacked on Snowden
You can't be sure. Just like you can't be sure you know if Snowden is telling the truth. Him and Greenwald et al haven't exactly been great stewards of that info.

First it was that only he had the docs. Then it was him and some other people. Then wikileaks claimed to have some. Then one hong kong paper claimed to have some. Then what?
b) believe that of the millions of files stolen, all of them resulted in the movement of British spy(ies)
I didn't say that
b1- see a2
b2 - If only 2 spies had to be moved, this would still legally fit the category of "spies," so see a2

It sounds like you all received the same Iraq WMD press releases.

This was a leaked revelation to the press.

You don't have to believe it, but to think leaked documents don't put lives at risk is asinine.
 

tru_m.a.c

IC veteran
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
31,629
Reputation
6,942
Daps
91,479
Reppin
Gaithersburg, MD via Queens/LI
The news reported this.This wasn't a government press conference.

How would a news source know that top secret files were stolen?

How would a news source know that those files resulted in the top secret movement of top secret agents?

How would a news source be the first entity to report on this issue?
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
337,479
Reputation
-34,919
Daps
640,932
Reppin
The Deep State
How would a news source know that top secret files were stolen?
a member of the UK PM's office said this is what happened

How would a news source know that those files resulted in the top secret movement of top secret agents?
Senior officials

How would a news source be the first entity to report on this issue?
Do you know what controlled leaks are?
 

tru_m.a.c

IC veteran
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
31,629
Reputation
6,942
Daps
91,479
Reppin
Gaithersburg, MD via Queens/LI
a member of the UK PM's office said this is what happened

Senior officials

Do you know what controlled leaks are?

I'm trying to see if you realize you're basing your entire argument on faith in government sources who will never be named and evidence you will never see.
 
Top