BREAKING: SANDERS INSTITUTE SHUTTING DOWN ADMIST FRAUD ALLEGATIONS

[88m3]

A little slush fund-y

 

[FAH1223]

So they raised about $1.1M in 2 years, did research, convened a large gathering last year... don't see the problem. It may look a little slush fundy but I don't see the big deal. Fraud allegations sound ridiculous. Plenty of non-profits out there are spending a lot on overhead for the people conducting the programs.

 

[Pirius Black]

They put his fukk up son in law in charge too. A guy who used to sell snowboards pulling in a six figure income while only producing 6 YouTube videos. Looking forward to seeing those tax returns from 2016 onward.

 

[The G.O.D II]

I admit that I have a network of friends with important jobs?

oh, ok.

sorry you dont.

I doubt you even leave your house let alone have any “network” unless we talking about the millions of people you follow on Twitter

 

[storyteller]

Remember the last time Nap took allegations and tried to convince you they were proof of guilt? Spoiler Alert: He was wrong and looked stupid...

I don't think yall get it. Bernie and Jane Sanders are in DEEP shyt over this Vermont College deal

https://www.washingtonpost.com/amph...567468-e76e-11e8-a939-9469f1166f9d_story.html

 

[BoBurnz]

I say this genuinely. Not as a joke or insult

You need to go outside and get the fukk off twitter.

 

[Apollo Kid]

I really hope you get paid to post propaganda if not you need to go outside and enjoy life.

 

[ill]

Corruption is bad

So then why do you deep throat the Clintons?

Lmao at the Foundation having an A+ rating.

Lmao at you thinking the Clinton foundation is anything but corrupt.

 

[the cac mamba]

I can't post in any Sanders thread. You tell me where I'm supposed to post this. They dont let anything remotely critical of Sanders on this forum.

it's on an individual basis

for example, i'm banned from your russia thread because nobody cares about the fact that i think it's a huge, embarrassing bust. which is fair enough and on the same note, no one gives a motherfukk what your DNC whoring ass thinks about bernie sanders. and the reason is that after 2016, when you spent a year shouting about how hillary was the best candidate and then she lost, you are not a credible poster when it comes to picking winners.

 

[the cac mamba]

Dude paid 3 employees with 50% of the donations.

Jesus Christ.

I mean whats more to say?

hillary could have paid 2.5?

 

[Pressure]

So they raised about $1.1M in 2 years, did research, convened a large gathering last year... don't see the problem. It may look a little slush fundy but I don't see the big deal. Fraud allegations sound ridiculous. Plenty of non-profits out there are spending a lot on overhead for the people conducting the programs.

It's definitely slush fundy and there's legitimate criticism here.

 

[88m3]

It's definitely slush fundy and there's legitimate criticism here.

Es ist verboten!

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

So they raised about $1.1M in 2 years, did research, convened a large gathering last year... don't see the problem. It may look a little slush fundy but I don't see the big deal. Fraud allegations sound ridiculous. Plenty of non-profits out there are spending a lot on overhead for the people conducting the programs.

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

So then why do you deep throat the Clintons?

Lmao at the Foundation having an A+ rating.

Lmao at you thinking the Clinton foundation is anything but corrupt.

Using that logic, you'd think Sanders would have learned from what not to do...

 

[Pressure]

Using that logic, you'd think Sanders would have learned from what not to do...

The only argument I'm seeing here is that you can't criticize the Sanders foundation because they believe the Clinton foundation is corrupt. But they spent a lot of time criticizing the Clinton foundation for being corrupt and should disqualify her from being POTUS.

Should we bring up the Trump foundation